Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to be shocked by the Irish referendum?

477 replies

Yetmorebeanstocount · 09/03/2024 16:17

I'm not from the Irish Republic. I just read what the ballot was about. I am shocked at what their constitution contained:

Article 41.2.1° “In particular, the State recognises that by her life within the home, woman gives to the State a support without which the common good cannot be achieved.”
Article 41.2.2° “The State shall, therefore, endeavour to ensure that mothers shall not be obliged by economic necessity to engage in labour to the neglect of their duties in the home.”

I'm even more shocked that early results suggest the Irish have voted to KEEP this dire crap in their constitution.

Am I missing something?

OP posts:
HornyHornersPinkyWinky · 09/03/2024 19:03

SidekickSylvia · 09/03/2024 18:53

The Irish electorate tends to be quite politically savvy.

I agree with this whole post, but particularly this line. There is no way this was a knee-jerk reaction, or a protest vote against Varadkar etc. This will have been well considered and thought through by voters.

Exactly - the protest vote will come soon enough with the General Election...

Jesusmaryjosephandtheweedon · 09/03/2024 19:04

Rosiiee · 09/03/2024 17:56

We’re not stuck in the 18th century.

I’m a barrister and voted no. It’s too ambiguous. What’s a ‘durable relationship’? Who determines what a ‘durable relationship’ is? Every judge will have a different interpretation meaning that the law would become subjective. If people want to access the protection granted by the constitution to married couples then they can marry- keep in mind that protection also means responsibilities (ie spousal support).

The second proposed amendment just wants to palm off responsibility to carers and relieve the State of same. Namely financial.

Everyone I know also voted no. If Ireland wants constitutional changes then make them make sense. Don’t give us some ambiguous half-arsed wording changes.

Exactly. The government underestimated the general public on this occasion

TheKeatingFive · 09/03/2024 19:10

I'm annoyed that many schools were closed to facilitate voting and all around the country parents had to take a day leave because they had no childcare, lets face it the majority were women. Many had grand mothers step in. I thought this was a bit ironic!! If we really care about women families and carers we'd be organising polling stations elsewhere.

And on international women's day no less. 🙄

Devonshiregal · 09/03/2024 19:13

OchonAgusOchonOh · 09/03/2024 16:54

Yes, you are missing something.

It was not a simple deletion, which probably would have carried. The replacement text included a clause that was vague and had the potential for pushing care back on to the family.

Unlike the British who voted for brexit despite not knowing what that actually meant, Irish people tend not to vote for constitutional changes that are not clear in advance of voting.

Is this really necessary? Do we need to insult people, whole countries full of people? To what ends?

ThirtyThrillionThreeTrees · 09/03/2024 19:19

For anyone who is interested,

The "family" referendum has been defeated with 67% voting no.

The "care" referendum result is expected later this evening with a strong no vote also anticipated.

Doteycat · 09/03/2024 19:19

Devonshiregal · 09/03/2024 19:13

Is this really necessary? Do we need to insult people, whole countries full of people? To what ends?

So are you also outraged by the second post on this thread?

Chulainn · 09/03/2024 19:21

Devonshiregal · 09/03/2024 19:13

Is this really necessary? Do we need to insult people, whole countries full of people? To what ends?

I agree people or countries full of people shouldn't be insulted. However, do you feel the same about the Irish being insulted? I didn't see you sticking up for the Irish when accused of being stuck in the 18th century. If you are against insulting people it should be across the board.

Anti-Irish sentiment is rife on Mumsnet and appears to be accepted by most. It shouldn't be.

Mittens1717 · 09/03/2024 19:23

Don't be shocked, the right decision was made, delighted with the result

OchonAgusOchonOh · 09/03/2024 19:37

enchantedsquirrelwood · 09/03/2024 19:03

Unlike the British who voted for brexit despite not knowing what that actually meant, Irish people tend not to vote for constitutional changes that are not clear in advance of voting

Ha ha.

But how do you know the OP is British, or even lives in the UK (or GB)? After all, we're constantly being told not to assume that on MN, despite it being a UK website.

I wasn't surprised to see the (Irish) result because I'd seen the other thread and seen that it was confusing, controversial and badly drafted. Actually I wasn't surprised by the Brexit result either.

I didn't say or assume the op was British. I said that the Irish are unlike the British in this regard.

If I was assuming the op's nationality I would have said "unlike you British".

OchonAgusOchonOh · 09/03/2024 19:41

Devonshiregal · 09/03/2024 19:13

Is this really necessary? Do we need to insult people, whole countries full of people? To what ends?

It's merely a statement of fact. Do you deny the British did not know what brexit would look like when they voted for it?

And as pp's have said, if you're so concerned at countries being insulted, where is your outrage at the post stating Ireland is stuck in the 18th century?

DublinFemale · 09/03/2024 19:54

That racist remark was deleted. How many complaints were made to have it deleted.

NaomhPadraigin · 09/03/2024 19:57

OchonAgusOchonOh · 09/03/2024 19:41

It's merely a statement of fact. Do you deny the British did not know what brexit would look like when they voted for it?

And as pp's have said, if you're so concerned at countries being insulted, where is your outrage at the post stating Ireland is stuck in the 18th century?

I've reported that comment, as I think it's disgraceful. Let's see if MN stand by their "Talk Guidelines" .... or is it OK if it's against those pesky Irish? 😡

Cross Post with @DublinFemale - thanks for the update! Glad to hear it.

DanielGault · 09/03/2024 20:00

NaomhPadraigin · 09/03/2024 19:57

I've reported that comment, as I think it's disgraceful. Let's see if MN stand by their "Talk Guidelines" .... or is it OK if it's against those pesky Irish? 😡

Cross Post with @DublinFemale - thanks for the update! Glad to hear it.

Edited

We're ripe for the kicking, as ever.

Sashamalia · 09/03/2024 20:01

I think that the general public in ireland were too afraid of change.

In.my opinion it's the wrong result.

But I respect the vote.

I'm in ireland

WithACatLikeTread · 09/03/2024 20:04

Doteycat · 09/03/2024 17:14

We know exactly what we were doing with no/no.

Unlike the english with brexit.
Maybe the english should take a leaf out of our book?
V pleased with the result.

Can you really criticise the British over that when it has taken years for the Irish to legalise abortion? And that only to twelve weeks? Or gay marriage ..

Sashamalia · 09/03/2024 20:04

To the British and irish people having goes at each other.

It's not always about nationality!

People worldwide are talking about irelands referendum today.

The op wherever she is from has taken an interest, and is allowed to talk about it.

WithACatLikeTread · 09/03/2024 20:05

Chulainn · 09/03/2024 19:21

I agree people or countries full of people shouldn't be insulted. However, do you feel the same about the Irish being insulted? I didn't see you sticking up for the Irish when accused of being stuck in the 18th century. If you are against insulting people it should be across the board.

Anti-Irish sentiment is rife on Mumsnet and appears to be accepted by most. It shouldn't be.

Anti English comments are too. Just look at this thread.

Doteycat · 09/03/2024 20:06

WithACatLikeTread · 09/03/2024 20:04

Can you really criticise the British over that when it has taken years for the Irish to legalise abortion? And that only to twelve weeks? Or gay marriage ..

Clearly i can.
And a lot more besides.
Youve some cheek.

DanielGault · 09/03/2024 20:07

Sashamalia · 09/03/2024 20:01

I think that the general public in ireland were too afraid of change.

In.my opinion it's the wrong result.

But I respect the vote.

I'm in ireland

Edited

Nope. I think we didn't want to say yes for yeses sake. I think caution is sensible when it comes to something as important as the constitution. And tbh, it's pretty insulting to insinuate we're 'afraid of change' when we have demonstrated how well able we are to deal with it in the last 20 years.

OchonAgusOchonOh · 09/03/2024 20:07

Sashamalia · 09/03/2024 20:01

I think that the general public in ireland were too afraid of change.

In.my opinion it's the wrong result.

But I respect the vote.

I'm in ireland

Edited

Sorry, what?

It had nothing to do with being afraid of change. If that were the case, repeal and marriage equality would not have been carried.

For most people I know who voted against them, it was due to the lack of clarity in the wording meaning that we have no idea of what the unintended consequences of voting yes would be.

Our constitution is a powerful document. If you don't know the impact of a change, the only sensibly vote is to vote against the change and wait on the opportunity to vote for a clearer version.

WithACatLikeTread · 09/03/2024 20:08

I don't condone anti Irish comments but anti English comments are unacceptable as well but rife on here.

ThirtyThrillionThreeTrees · 09/03/2024 20:09

Sashamalia · 09/03/2024 20:01

I think that the general public in ireland were too afraid of change.

In.my opinion it's the wrong result.

But I respect the vote.

I'm in ireland

Edited

I think the Irish public have proven many times that they are very open to change - divorce, gay marraige & abortion results prove same.

This result wasn't driven by a fear of change. It was driven by the lack of sufficiently acceptable wording proposed.

So far those critical of the result have cited fear of change, lack of understanding, an anti government stance, influence of far right etc. It's simply not true - it wasn't a good enough and clear enough proposal, supported by transparent legal explanation. If it had been it would hace been passed. There is an appetite for change but not an appetite for stupidity.

januaryjan · 09/03/2024 20:09

TwentyFirstCenturyFox · 09/03/2024 16:30

If only the English would come and write our constitution for us.

😁

WithACatLikeTread · 09/03/2024 20:09

Doteycat · 09/03/2024 20:06

Clearly i can.
And a lot more besides.
Youve some cheek.

Why cheek? Why didn't they abolish the abortion ban years ago? I am aware it is still difficult to get abortions in NI for example. Why can't I criticise that or is that racist?

BurnerName1 · 09/03/2024 20:09

DublinFemale · 09/03/2024 18:02

We Irish are well versed in referendums and we are highly educated to the consequences of any changes.

We take seriously and say no if we have to.

I suspect that the Irish got burnt by the sneaking through of gender identity nonsense under the abortion and gay marriage referendums. They won't make the same mistake twice and good on them.

Swipe left for the next trending thread