Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To point out that the word is “faze” and not “phase” in this context?

384 replies

Anyotherdude · 03/03/2024 13:57

I’ve been reading so many threads where someone writes about being “phased” or “not phased” about something.
it was bothering me so much that I checked to see if it was me that was getting it wrong.
I didn’t.
To faze is to disturb, bother, or embarrass, but a phase is a stage or step, so you can be phased into a role, but if you’re not bothered by something, it doesn’t faze you!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
ChristianHornersGlisteningFinger · 05/03/2024 09:21

KimberleyClark · 05/03/2024 09:19

And my pet hate “a bacteria” or “this phenomena” or “that criteria”. Those words are plurals. The singulars are bacteria, phenomenon, criterion. I do think the battle is being lost on those though.

Where do you stand on “myriad” @KimberleyClark? 😉.

KimberleyClark · 05/03/2024 09:29

ChristianHornersGlisteningFinger · 05/03/2024 09:21

Where do you stand on “myriad” @KimberleyClark? 😉.

Edited

Collective noun, like variety? So a myriad would be correct.

Another one - hung vs hanged. Clothes, pictures, wallpaper, parliaments are hung. People are hanged.

marshmallowfinder · 05/03/2024 09:32

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 04/03/2024 10:52

Mine were always
PapER stationERy
StationARy cAR.

Mine is 'E is for envelope!'

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 05/03/2024 09:34

I’ve just seen ‘queezy’ (queasy) elsewhere.

ChristianHornersGlisteningFinger · 05/03/2024 09:36

KimberleyClark · 05/03/2024 09:29

Collective noun, like variety? So a myriad would be correct.

Another one - hung vs hanged. Clothes, pictures, wallpaper, parliaments are hung. People are hanged.

I’m afraid not.

“myriad” is an adjective, not a collective noun.

The correct usage is “there are myriad reasons why this plan will not succeed” or “the painting contained myriad colours”.

Not “a myriad of reasons” or “a myriad of colours”. But this latter usage is so common now that it is arguably an acceptable alternative.

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 05/03/2024 09:37

Yuckyyuckyuckity · 04/03/2024 17:33

Just saw an absolute corker on FB marketplace and had to post.

Otter man. As in ottoman. My new favourite!

My ‘best’ was a ‘chez lounge’. I forget whether it was a ‘needs gone asap’ but very likely.

KimberleyClark · 05/03/2024 09:38

ChristianHornersGlisteningFinger · 05/03/2024 09:36

I’m afraid not.

“myriad” is an adjective, not a collective noun.

The correct usage is “there are myriad reasons why this plan will not succeed” or “the painting contained myriad colours”.

Not “a myriad of reasons” or “a myriad of colours”. But this latter usage is so common now that it is arguably an acceptable alternative.

Edited

Ah, you got me.

Edit:

Actually no you didn’t. Myriad is a noun and an adjective.

Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
noun
noun: myriad; plural noun: myriads

  1. 1.
  2. a countless or extremely great number of people or things.
  3. "there's a myriad of islands to explore"
adjective adjective: myriad
  1. countless or extremely great in number.
  2. "he gazed at the myriad lights of the city"
GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 05/03/2024 09:44

Not quite the same type of peeve, but I do wish those who post about very well known people would at least spell their names correctly!

E.g. ‘Judy’ Dench, and of course ‘Kier’ Starmer is everywhere.

ChristianHornersGlisteningFinger · 05/03/2024 09:58

KimberleyClark · 05/03/2024 09:38

Ah, you got me.

Edit:

Actually no you didn’t. Myriad is a noun and an adjective.

Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
noun
noun: myriad; plural noun: myriads

  1. 1.
  2. a countless or extremely great number of people or things.
  3. "there's a myriad of islands to explore"
adjective adjective: myriad
  1. countless or extremely great in number.
  2. "he gazed at the myriad lights of the city"
Edited

I wasn’t trying to “get” you. I thought this was a friendly chat?

As I said, the “of” usage is now considered an acceptable alternative due to ubiquity, but it’s not for the purists!

KimberleyClark · 05/03/2024 10:11

ChristianHornersGlisteningFinger · 05/03/2024 09:58

I wasn’t trying to “get” you. I thought this was a friendly chat?

As I said, the “of” usage is now considered an acceptable alternative due to ubiquity, but it’s not for the purists!

Apologies, feeling a bit paranoid this morning!

Isittimeformynapyet · 05/03/2024 10:16

"Hence why" 😣

CaptainMyCaptain · 05/03/2024 10:20

KimberleyClark · 05/03/2024 09:19

And my pet hate “a bacteria” or “this phenomena” or “that criteria”. Those words are plurals. The singulars are bacteria, phenomenon, criterion. I do think the battle is being lost on those though.

I'd feel a bit of a tit asking for a panino though rather than a panini.

Abitofalark · 05/03/2024 10:21

KimberleyClark · 05/03/2024 09:19

And my pet hate “a bacteria” or “this phenomena” or “that criteria”. Those words are plurals. The singulars are bacteria, phenomenon, criterion. I do think the battle is being lost on those though.

A slip or predictive text on bacterium?

Isittimeformynapyet · 05/03/2024 10:25

CaptainMyCaptain · 05/03/2024 10:20

I'd feel a bit of a tit asking for a panino though rather than a panini.

😂

KimberleyClark · 05/03/2024 10:26

Abitofalark · 05/03/2024 10:21

A slip or predictive text on bacterium?

I’m not sure, could have been either!

Glitterblue · 05/03/2024 10:40

Sharkknife · 03/03/2024 16:19

The one that annoys me is mortified instead of horrified. Completely different meaning!

@Sharkknife I was going to say that too, but was reading through the thread first to see if anyone else had mentioned it! It seems to be used wrongly most of the time now - it’s almost as if the meaning has changed!

Abitofalark · 05/03/2024 10:50

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 05/03/2024 09:44

Not quite the same type of peeve, but I do wish those who post about very well known people would at least spell their names correctly!

E.g. ‘Judy’ Dench, and of course ‘Kier’ Starmer is everywhere.

It's almost as if there's a rule that you must get the name wrong - a secret mumsnet code.

ChessieFL · 05/03/2024 10:58

Another is people saying a slither of cake (or whatever) instead of a sliver.

Myotherdogsanoodle · 05/03/2024 12:01

FoxtrotOscarFoxtrotOscar · 03/03/2024 23:06

Not sure if it's been mentioned but frequently seen is "to baulk" at something when it should be "to balk".
Again it comes from hearing the word rather than having seen it written down.

The me/I errors and it's not even a difficult rule.

No, baulk is correct. As is balk but that’s more the US spelling

BringMeTea · 05/03/2024 12:11

Ok, I'm throwing data in to the mix. I smile when I hear it used as a plural... infrequently. I am aware that singular use is now considered acceptable.

Seymour5 · 05/03/2024 13:45

ChessieFL · 05/03/2024 10:58

Another is people saying a slither of cake (or whatever) instead of a sliver.

Nails on blackboard moment.

ChristianHornersGlisteningFinger · 05/03/2024 13:49

CaptainMyCaptain · 05/03/2024 10:20

I'd feel a bit of a tit asking for a panino though rather than a panini.

I agree but I can’t say “a panini” so I fudge it by saying things like “Can I have one of those cheese and ham panini”?

FuzzyPuffling · 05/03/2024 16:33

"A trouser".
"A red lip".

What, just the one?

CaptainMyCaptain · 05/03/2024 16:43

ChristianHornersGlisteningFinger · 05/03/2024 13:49

I agree but I can’t say “a panini” so I fudge it by saying things like “Can I have one of those cheese and ham panini”?

🤣 I just buy a sandwich.

DancingFerret · 05/03/2024 17:36

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 05/03/2024 09:44

Not quite the same type of peeve, but I do wish those who post about very well known people would at least spell their names correctly!

E.g. ‘Judy’ Dench, and of course ‘Kier’ Starmer is everywhere.

I'm with you on that one; it was a relief when Chelsy Davy finally split with Harry because people really couldn't, or refused to, get their heads round the spelling of her name. Even now, I occasionally see Chelsea, Chelsey, or Chelsee, usually followed by Davey or Davee.

I think it's the dogged persistence in spelling it "their" way that really gets to me. It's arrogance, ignorance, and lack of attention to detail combined.

Swipe left for the next trending thread