Your little tirade here really doesn't lead me to respect your point of view.
You're in HR, I don't expect you to respect the point of view of anyone who's critical of your profession and the people who work in it. You pretty much showed your cards when you said you didn't give a shit what anyone thought because you earn £90k. That was honest and I just wish you people would own it that readily in real life.
I am not complaining about anything and I don't care if people don't love me.
This is the third (fourth?) lengthy post you've written justifying yourself and complaining.
You haven't answered my question and defined what makes a job important vs one that isn't
It was a disingenuous question - as if you can't think of anything that makes a job more worthwhile than HR! Something that involves healing, nursing or protecting vulnerable people. It's OK, I'm not a trauma surgeon either, but nor am I pretending that no job in the world is more worthwhile or important than mine. Again, it's the bloody dishonesty. Maybe you guys are largely just victims of crap branding.
Btw the organisations who employ these professionals also have HR teams backing them up.
Two of the best places I ever worked didn't have HR. They didn't need to. Their policies were clear and accessible and they didn't need protecting because they hired well, treated people well and kept to the law.
But these organisations you mention have HR teams backing up the businesses. This is the lie you won't let go at the heart of the matter. HR is there to protect the business. That might mean protecting an individual but only if that is in the interests of the business. If it isn't, HR will sort the hit and make it look like an accident, and obviously not tell you.
I appreciate you can't tell people when you're doing this, and it isn't your decision to fire people, but you chose the job where you have to do these fixes and act like you're their friend while you do it. Expect £90k. Don't expect love.