Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Don’t have more kids if you can’t afford them!

1000 replies

SportMum1982 · 31/01/2024 12:43

I’m not a raving Tory! But honestly I would have loved more children!!! I would have loved 4 kids but I know we cannot afford 4 kids.

Why do people expect the state to pay for their children? Bar education though! If I’m being really cruel tell me, but I feel I did want more kids but stopped.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-67999028

Sophie with her children

Two-child benefit cap: ‘Every month is a struggle’

Half a million households are now affected by either the two-child limit, the benefit cap or both.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-67999028

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
izimbra · 31/01/2024 21:29

"Bit of a pisstake to compare women here to those living in absolute poverty"

You think nobody should have children if they can't afford to do it without help from the state.

So that would be about a third of the UK population.

BTW - there are families in the UK who can't adequately feed themselves, clothe themselves or pay their housing costs.

SockieSockie · 31/01/2024 21:30

izimbra · 31/01/2024 21:29

"Bit of a pisstake to compare women here to those living in absolute poverty"

You think nobody should have children if they can't afford to do it without help from the state.

So that would be about a third of the UK population.

BTW - there are families in the UK who can't adequately feed themselves, clothe themselves or pay their housing costs.

That's not what I said, so I'm not bothering to reply properly.

Dacadactyl · 31/01/2024 21:32

izimbra · 31/01/2024 21:08

"Whatever it is, you can't just have people continuing to have kids that are provided for by the benefit system ad infinitum."

Other countries do, and they're not in a state of social collapse.

The bottom line is that most women voluntarily choose to have small families. In fact women are having fewer children and having them later in life. More and more women are choosing not to have families at alll

We don't need this policy.

"They're just not capable people, nor are they capable parents....as evidenced by the fact that they are having more kids than they can afford."

So people on low incomes who have children and then need to claim housing benefit/UC - ie they're having more children than they can afford without help from the tax payer, they're all bad parents who aren't capable of raising happy, healthy children? So that would be about a third of families.

That is not what I said.

Until fairly recently I believe you didnt have to look for work until your youngest child was 12 (!!!) and you'd get all other associated benefits for having as many kids (as you wanted) on top! There were plenty of people playing that system, believe me. I grew up with them and ALL of their parents were feckless and a scourge on society.

Imagine not having to go to work for at least 12 years, just because you didnt want to, safe in the knowledge you'd still be housed, clothed and fed. Imagine what that does to the psyche. It is a damaging message for people and their children to get used to.

The 2 child cap is seeking to address this as far as im concerned.

Dacadactyl · 31/01/2024 21:36

OriginalUsername2 · 31/01/2024 21:23

Who should then? Would you prefer to live in a society where these children - who didn’t ask to exist - are on the street begging?

The bloody parents should!

And if they're incapable of providing for them, I have no idea why they think the government should do it. Or why they think they'll get any sympathy crying to the papers.

Bookist · 31/01/2024 21:37

Anyone can make a mistake. It's very easy to do.

But I'm highly suspicious of people who make the same mistake, time and again, which also just happens to result in their financial gain.

BoPeepsSheep · 31/01/2024 21:38

I live in a nice area of town. I’m hoping to be able to move into a bungalow in the next ten years, still in the same area.

Met a woman yesterday 2 years older than me. Has never worked. Three kids, three dads. None of them pay. She doesn’t work, says it’s not worth it and she’s got UC and PIP because she has althritis and needs help.

Shes asking for the council to rehouse her. Says she quite likes X part of town (where I live) and wants a bungalow. I was struck by the fact I’ve worked for 30 years and hope to afford XYZ as a result, where as she expects somebody else to give her the same XYZ because she wants it.

I was also thrilled to hear that she gives her teenage son 100% of her PIP to spend on vaping and gaming. And I wish I was joking.

Country needs a massive kick up the arse.

winewine · 31/01/2024 21:38

If you need taxpayer's support for the children you already have, please don't have any more.

Talii · 31/01/2024 21:41

Naptrappedmummy · 31/01/2024 20:04

They are. Much more than in other countries. Our discrimination laws are very tight. If you think we need to ‘diversify’ you would be shocked by a lot of the rest of the world.

But the driver of the increase is not profound physical disability in fact they have reduced. We have fewer people now with what used to be more common conditions such as Downs Syndrome due to prenatal testing.

I was giving an example.

It is not about overt discrimination but there is a lack of diversity in areas of the work force. It’s simple fact that can be proven.

Being employed is positive for many people and instead of saying “oh the Equality Act will protect you”, we need to encourage people and help them be accepted. Work should work for people.

winewine · 31/01/2024 21:42

Some people on benefits look at having another child as the equivalent to having a pay rise.

Papyrophile · 31/01/2024 21:45

I think izimbra has a political agenda to spin to create a constituency of people who need saving from themselves and their reproductive instincts.

twnety · 31/01/2024 21:45

winewine · 31/01/2024 21:42

Some people on benefits look at having another child as the equivalent to having a pay rise.

Oh yes, look at the thousands rolling in for those on benefits

converseandjeans · 31/01/2024 21:46

@winewine

A woman came in today with her proof of entitlement which was her UC statement.
It was £3800.00 for the month.

Is this true? That's £45,600/year - so equivalent of around £60,000 salary!

Nobody on MN ever believes that people get large amounts for doing nothing.

That's double my salary & I work 4 long days/week for that.

Papyrophile · 31/01/2024 21:49

converseandjeans · 31/01/2024 21:46

@winewine

A woman came in today with her proof of entitlement which was her UC statement.
It was £3800.00 for the month.

Is this true? That's £45,600/year - so equivalent of around £60,000 salary!

Nobody on MN ever believes that people get large amounts for doing nothing.

That's double my salary & I work 4 long days/week for that.

That does upset a lot of people who go to work five days a week, and take home a lot less. Especially when their kids are the ones disrupting classes for laughs.

Rosiiee · 31/01/2024 21:52

@winewine surely no one brings a human being into the world just for a monthly cheque!

OriginalUsername2 · 31/01/2024 21:58

Dacadactyl · 31/01/2024 21:36

The bloody parents should!

And if they're incapable of providing for them, I have no idea why they think the government should do it. Or why they think they'll get any sympathy crying to the papers.

It’s not that simple. Read sociology books.

There will always be uneducated poor people having children.

winewine · 31/01/2024 21:59

@Papyrophile @converseandjeans it is 100% true but people don't want to believe it.
@twnety yes some are a lot better off on benefits than people working.
@Rosiiee being a single adult with no dependents you will be a lot worse off than someone unemployed with children.

winewine · 31/01/2024 22:01

@Rosiiee some women get pregnant when their child gets to an age when they have to start looking for work.

Unpopular options but I've seen it many times over through my work.

madderthanahatter · 31/01/2024 22:02

twnety · 31/01/2024 21:45

Oh yes, look at the thousands rolling in for those on benefits

I remember a while ago someone posting what the Radfords would be entitled to in child tax credits up until the cap. The thousands literally were rolling in. Albeit most families don't have 16 kids, but 4+ kids on benefits pre cap was good money, all things considered.

Dacadactyl · 31/01/2024 22:03

OriginalUsername2 · 31/01/2024 21:58

It’s not that simple. Read sociology books.

There will always be uneducated poor people having children.

Yes, but then they need an incentive to stop eg the benefit cap. And if they don't stop, maybe their children will.

SummerFeverVenice · 31/01/2024 22:05

SportMum1982 · 31/01/2024 12:43

I’m not a raving Tory! But honestly I would have loved more children!!! I would have loved 4 kids but I know we cannot afford 4 kids.

Why do people expect the state to pay for their children? Bar education though! If I’m being really cruel tell me, but I feel I did want more kids but stopped.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-67999028

YABVU
Most families in this situation could afford the children at the time they decided not to terminate a pregnancy. From the article:
”Almost half of those affected by the two-child benefit limit are single parents, such as Frances, in London. Her third child was still a baby when her relationship with her husband broke down, and he doesn't support the family financially.
Her children are now aged 11, six, and three. Frances has "reluctantly" left her job as a business administrator as she says it wouldn't cover the cost of childcare.
"I've heard the argument that you need to plan your family, but I did plan, thinking I was in a two-parent family unit.
"But through a breakdown in the relationship, we went from an average London family to me being a single parent and having to juggle those demands and responsibility, and then going to not having an income because of that - it's not anything I could have pre-empted."

So it’s not true that child poverty is due to people expecting the state to pay for their children or failing to plan to only have as many as they can afford.

winewine · 31/01/2024 22:06

@OriginalUsername2
Uneducated poor people will keep having children if there is a financial incentive to do so.

This needs to stop hence the cap.

BouncingJAS · 31/01/2024 22:08

@BoPeepsSheep

People will try to dismiss your example but I have heard it one too many times all over the UK

There are too many people in the UK actively abusing the benefits system for their own benefit.

This had now combined with the people that actually need help to create a perfect storm.

And it just isn't sustainable.

People need to be told "no" in no uncertain terms. No to benefits. No to a free house. No to Child benefit. Not unless you work. Period.

Thats what is has come down to. Tough love.

BouncingJAS · 31/01/2024 22:10

@Papyrophile

Just ignore Izimbra. She goes around in circles and adds no value to any discussion. Just platitudes.

SummerFeverVenice · 31/01/2024 22:10

Until fairly recently I believe you didnt have to look for work until your youngest child was 12 (!!!)

That would have been 2008. The two child benefit cap came into effect in 2017- the same year the age of youngest child at which a single parent must be available to wire dropped from age 5 to age 3.

Don’t have more kids if you can’t afford them!
Hmmmmaybe · 31/01/2024 22:14

There are very valid arguments to look at a number of benefits and the welfare system in the Uk - inherited council tenancies anyone??

but child benefit is a grum
amd unnecessary place to target

i genuinely belief - consciously or not - it’s driven by a desire to control women and their
choices

people just can’t resist controlling women

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread