There seems to be some misunderstanding here. I'm certainly not "shilling" for anyone. I think Putin is a vile piece of work, Russia's implementation of democracy a farce, the invasion of Ukraine completely unjustified and the western powers correct in opposing it. I hope that helps clarify things.
There are two different issues being conflated here: what political and electoral system a country has, in theory and on paper, and how transparently the processes of that system are followed to honestly deliver what it claims to deliver.
Russia is a multi-party representative democracy. That is just a fact. They hold elections and people vote for a choice of different candidates from different parties. Are the processes surrounding this fair, transparent and honourable enough for it to deliver what democracy is supposed to deliver? Hell no. (Although it must be remembered that Putin appears to be very popular within Russia. Sometimes democracy actually destroys itself - as it looks like it may also soon do in the USA.)
The UK is also a multi-party representative democracy. We hold elections and people vote for a choice of diffeent candidates from different parties. Are the processes surrounding this fair, transparent and honourable enough for it to deliver what democracy is supposed to deliver? Hell no.
OK, for the avoidance of doubt: Russia is worse. It's further down the road of authoritarianism than we are. And the British have always been peculiarly good at dressing up the exercise of raw power in civilised enough garb to make it look like something else. But this honestly just looks like a matter of degree to me, and not a large enough one to inspire me to go and fight to defend "British values" as though they're something different in kind and thereby sacred.