Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Would you have a baby at 50?

1000 replies

pumpkinpatch6 · 16/01/2024 01:01

Off the back of the "Do you regret having a baby at 40" thread, would you have a child at 50 assuming you can provide for it emotionally and financially? Obviously medical assistance would be needed.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
alltootired · 16/01/2024 09:56

@KimberleyClark I remember her. Most MNers defended her. She said later it was a mistake.

I am in my fifties. The idea of having a baby now is horrendous, but manageable. Having teenagers in your sixties is very unfair on the child.

Newchapterbeckons · 16/01/2024 09:57

emilysquest · 16/01/2024 09:53

Honestly, all these people who are "knackered" in their early 50s is quite dispiriting. Unless you have a chronic illness why would you be? I am 60 and still work more than full-time as a medical consultant, plus have a teenaged son. So I spent my 50s both doing my job and bringing up a young child (together with DH, but not with any grandparent help). Yes, childcare arrangements have to be made, but not because I was too tired to either do my job or look after my son, just because I could not be in 2 places at the same time. Everyone has to make those kind of juggling efforts. 60 and beyond is not necessarily decrepit!

You are not a spring chicken either whether you know it or not. Life expectancy is not guaranteed. Many of my friends in their 50s have had or are battling cancer. The point of having children so late in life is the awareness of the increased risk.
And whether you admit it or not you certainly do not have the stamina or energy of someone half your age.

alltootired · 16/01/2024 09:59

I know a few friends who have stamina and energy in their fifties, they are the exception. And my friends generally are pretty sporty. I also know lots who have had cancer in their fifties.

Ropeonasoap · 16/01/2024 09:59

x2boys · 16/01/2024 09:54

I wasnt replying to you I was replying to someone who already had children

Yes but you keep saying 'unless you can't have children of your own you wouldn't understand!'

And I haven't had children I've wanted and I still would rather be childless than do it at 50.

Please stop implying those of us who wanted kids would continue to pursue the idea without thought into our 50s like we're all so desperate we'd stop thinking about the implications of our actions.

user1471523870 · 16/01/2024 10:00

Yes, without a doubt! I am actually thinking about it.
I am in good health, my energy levels are still the same as always been, I have a nice job, big house, husband in same situation and a very active life in general. My little one is still very young and life has been difficult with him, but I am not too scared of sleepless nights and anything related to that.
About feeling guilty as the baby will have old parents soon, life is not fair, but he would have a sibling and we are planning not to be a burden. My dad is 75 and his mother, my granny, is 98 and still very indipendent. Hope to follow their footsteps!

thesugarbumfairy · 16/01/2024 10:00

No. No no no no no. I'm 50 this year. I had a hip replaced at 48 and will probably need more work done. I missed several years of being able to easily spend time with my kids because of my physical limitations. My H had a stroke last Summer and can't work. There is no way I'd bring a child into this.

KimberleyClark · 16/01/2024 10:01

Newchapterbeckons · 16/01/2024 09:57

You are not a spring chicken either whether you know it or not. Life expectancy is not guaranteed. Many of my friends in their 50s have had or are battling cancer. The point of having children so late in life is the awareness of the increased risk.
And whether you admit it or not you certainly do not have the stamina or energy of someone half your age.

And chronic health issues are much more likely to occur when you are past 50.

Dyra · 16/01/2024 10:01

Absolutely not.

While you might not be decrepit while they're little, you'll be heading that way by the time they're an adult. Definitely by the time they're hitting their 30s. Likelihood of you dying when they're still young is quite high too.

Dinkyboots · 16/01/2024 10:02

No, as I think 50 can still feel reasonably young and fit however I'm not sure the same could be said at 60 with a 9/10yo, or 66 with a 16yo doing their GCSEs etc. It's a lot of energy to bring a child up over the years, a lot of involvement and commitment and physical energy and it's not just about having a baby full stop, it's about being a hands-on parent until 18 at least and then providing advice and support (and dealing with young people's ups and downs) up to the early or mid 20s. It's a lot.

alltootired · 16/01/2024 10:03

People on MN like to pretend age does not exist and we will all live into our nineties in good health.
They ignore that last year life expectancy was downgraded as the previous life expectancies published had been over optimistic and thought life expectancy would continue to rise at the same rate as previously. It has not. Life expectancy for men is now 79.

Threewheeler1 · 16/01/2024 10:03

MotherofGorgons · 16/01/2024 09:25

Yes, I am menopausal. I am so done with nurturing! In my head, I am saying quietly " Fuck off Fuck off Fuck off" about ten times a day.

Exactly! My nurturing levels are in the toilet! Nothing left in the tank...

Fluffywhitecloudsinthesky · 16/01/2024 10:04

Nope, oxytocin levels at an all time low.

alltootired · 16/01/2024 10:04

If you have a baby at 50 with another womans egg and donated sperm the child might be fine. But if you are your partner have a child the chances of disability are very high.

KimberleyClark · 16/01/2024 10:05

Ropeonasoap · 16/01/2024 09:59

Yes but you keep saying 'unless you can't have children of your own you wouldn't understand!'

And I haven't had children I've wanted and I still would rather be childless than do it at 50.

Please stop implying those of us who wanted kids would continue to pursue the idea without thought into our 50s like we're all so desperate we'd stop thinking about the implications of our actions.

This in spades.

FeatherBlack · 16/01/2024 10:05

I had a baby at 41 and that was old enough imo. We were trying and decided if it didn't happen while I was 40, we'd stop. Ended up pg a few weeks before I turned 41. I'm almost 50 now and not a chance id even consider it.

x2boys · 16/01/2024 10:05

Ropeonasoap · 16/01/2024 09:59

Yes but you keep saying 'unless you can't have children of your own you wouldn't understand!'

And I haven't had children I've wanted and I still would rather be childless than do it at 50.

Please stop implying those of us who wanted kids would continue to pursue the idea without thought into our 50s like we're all so desperate we'd stop thinking about the implications of our actions.

I'm not implying that at all I'm saying some might continue to pursue that regardless if wether its wise
But its easy to say you would never pursue when you are in the fortunate position of already being a parent

horseyhorsey17 · 16/01/2024 10:07

Nope.

Couldn't anyway without IVF with donor eggs due to relatively early menopause, but even if I could, no way. Although weirdly I do keep dreaming about having a baby, maybe just because I can't now.

Beamur · 16/01/2024 10:07

No.
I'm early 50's with a teen DD. I don't want to do it all again and I am too old. Not old, but too old to do another 20 years of raising another child.
It's a worry about how death would impact DD already.

dottiedodah · 16/01/2024 10:09

Victoria Coren Mitchell,Naomi Campbell ,maybe they have the means to be able to care for /birth a new babe .In reality most women would find it difficult I think.When they are 20 you would be 70!

AndrewPreview · 16/01/2024 10:09

Fuck no.

ChanelNo19EDT · 16/01/2024 10:10

adding to the resounding NO
I'm 53 so I've missed the ''opportunity'' ha ha
Like another poster who had her youngest at 36, I feel I could have had dc a bit younger. I had my first at 33 but really, I think 29 would have been better. My youngest STILL isn't an ''adult''. It's a long haul. Not advising anybody to start at 20 but well, not like I had all the choices to start earlier but the security I thought I had, I didn't have it.

Raqu15 · 16/01/2024 10:11

I guess it depends on the circumstances. For me; no because I am fortunate enough to be able to have children naturally but for someone that has not been so fortunate, off course they would.

emilysquest · 16/01/2024 10:11

I knew I'd get that sort of pushback about what I said! And I did not choose to have my only baby in my mid-40s, that's the way it worked out. I know I would rather be in the position I am now, i.e. having my lovely son, than not. I know there are risks etc, not denying those. I was just saying I don't feel "knackered" yet, despite my job and my busy teenager, that's all! Maybe it's the HRT!

My DH is quite a bit younger than me, if that's any consolation!

Mumofmarauders · 16/01/2024 10:11

Dustyblue · 16/01/2024 02:32

Fuck no. I had my 1st-and-only at 42-ish, I'm 49 now & the sheer idea fills me with horror.

He took 7 years and 2 miscarriages to produce, and much as I love him I could not be more done if you stabbed me with a cooking thermometer.

Cooking thermometer 😂

QueenOfMOHO · 16/01/2024 10:11

There's a hell of a lot of ageism on this thread. My friend had a baby at 50, became pregnant accidentally and thought she was menopausal for the first 4 months.
The baby is healthy, loved and thriving.
There are also thousands of grandparents out there doing a great job, raising grandkids that they have parental responsibility for.
I have good news for all you 20 something's with no energy 😊 I also had no energy when I was 28, largely due to trying to establish myself in my career, but the amazing thing is, for lots of people you get more energy as you get older, not less. You also get more organised and experienced with life.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.