Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Why doesn’t the country support having children?

678 replies

NameChangeAsICouldBeOverReacting · 15/01/2024 09:25

Just seen an article on The Guardian about the 15 free hours for childcare for under 2’s and how the whole system is a mess.

I’m just starting to lose hope that this country doesn’t support working families anymore?

AIBU and need to think more positively, or have we screwed up massively by not supporting families?

The Guardian article which I read.

UK government’s free childcare scheme in disarray, charities say

Thousands of concerned parents reportedly struggling to sign up for flagship offering that starts in April

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2024/jan/15/uk-governments-free-childcare-scheme-in-disarray-charities-say

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
WithACatLikeTread · 16/01/2024 09:20

Dinkiedoo · 16/01/2024 08:42

Hasnt anyone realised yet that we are now a third world country now

We aren't.

WithACatLikeTread · 16/01/2024 09:22

CwmYoy · 16/01/2024 09:03

@apples24 "Are you willing to have a stroke before the age of 40?"

I'm in my 70s and a wheelchair user. However, I wasn't when planning our family.

Can you not see there is the world of difference between life changing events after having well-planned children and planning to bring them into a world of poverty?

How many do that?

ThinkingForward · 16/01/2024 09:26

@apples24

Share your pain, for some ppl there is a huge mismatch between what you pay in and what you get out when you need it. I looked at getting divorced when I had accident ( hemiplegia and occipital lobe brain damage) to improve the family finances. If it's work based your DH might also get Industrial Injury Benefit, PIP I found a nightmare to access. Demand for £20k in tax from HMRC one day and being told that I'm entitled to £72 a week in unemployment benefit.

@Shouldgetupearlier
The post ww2 welfare state model which labour is based on full employment. It seems that all governments have moved away from this as a core principle leading to worklessness and 37m ppl of working age with 28m ppl working, a labour shortage and 3% unemployment. It doesn't take a genius to work out why public services are crumbling.

Thatcher rigged the system to improve unemployment figures and Labour isn't minded to change it due to it's support base.

Dinkiedoo · 16/01/2024 09:27

Really.....train service rubbish NHS on its knees etc etc

WithACatLikeTread · 16/01/2024 09:33

Dinkiedoo · 16/01/2024 09:27

Really.....train service rubbish NHS on its knees etc etc

Third world usually means no running water or water that is dangerous, no hospitals, famine etc. I don't deny it is bad but a little perspective please.

user1492757084 · 16/01/2024 09:48

Funded childcare has increased. Parents have to factor in some responsibility. They should expect to spend some days per week looking after their own children, not hours.
Children benefit from lots of one to one time.

Maternity Leave payments are generous and give families the option of parents caring for their own very young children - that is the best outcome for kids.

We don't want a system where both parents have to work full time to pay the taxes which pay for others to care for their very young children.

Alicesmagicmushroom · 16/01/2024 10:01

@Dinkiedoo Agreed, it does feel like it. Services are failing across the board, and parts of the UK have deteriorated to the point of looking like slums. It’s a sad state of affairs but even Rome fell once upon a time.

LeopardPJS · 16/01/2024 10:06

Partly because the government is dominated by rich, entitled men who have never actually had to worry about any of this shit

LaurieStrode · 16/01/2024 10:22

NameChangeAsICouldBeOverReacting · 15/01/2024 09:43

That’s great @bluechicky , but the extortionate costs of nursery for the first 2 years is a killer. Our nursery fees are the highest in the world! We have an opportunity to fix this, but the government can’t even roll it out properly and they are leaving nurseries and parents in the lurch.

The costs are known. Save up for them in advance instead of expecting fellow citizens to pay for your optional lifestyle choices!

caringcarer · 16/01/2024 10:44

Fox111 · 15/01/2024 15:05

@caringcarer
What I mean is when you are young girl on a minimum wage you are making £80-£90 a day. Having just one child will not even make sense, you will be paying majority of your wage for childcare.

Has that not always been the case. If both parents pay half for childcare it's still worth going to work to get pension payments and to build your career and also to get out of the house and a few hours away from the baby.

Stopthetankerimtryingtosleep · 16/01/2024 10:45

I wonder if those saying 'don't have kids you can't afford' are able to support their adult DC in the way they would have liked when they planned them?

Soozikinzii · 16/01/2024 10:47

Wouldn't it be better if it was 15 hours for 3 years than the 30 hours for 1 and 15 for 1 ? It seems odd how that works ?

ThinkingForward · 16/01/2024 11:13

@LaurieStrode

How far do you extend this principle? Fat people paying for there diabetes treatment? Offenders paying for there incarceration?

As always the discussion is where do you syndicate cost, risk and benefit. A starter would be contributory based. So society taxes the individual and creates an entitlement for them. If they then don't use that then this can be redirected.

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 16/01/2024 12:16

AgentJohnson · 16/01/2024 06:48

Our nursery fees are the highest in the world!

Higher taxes fund subsidised childcare. The fact that UK voters consistently vote in governments that in ‘principal’ are against higher taxes says all you need to know. Ditto over social care, education, health etc. Don’t underestimate people’s ability to vote against their own self interests in favour of their social aspirations.

There's a lot to be said to those "expensive countries", Scandinavia comes to mind. Things cost more, taxes are higher etc but salaries are also higher and important things are properly funded (childcare, education, healthcare, energy improvements, pensions, elderly care etc).

I think if people properly understood it, AND it was managed correctly, they wouldn't be averse to higher taxes that help them live better. The way our government do it though is to tax us and then claim we have no money to fund things people feel are actually important.

It would be a full overhaul, if not an actual revolution, to get us there but we won't do that.

Fox111 · 16/01/2024 12:56

@apples24
I don't agree with the whole principle of having children when you can afford them. Money and wealth is like a roller coaster, one day you have nothing then everything then nothing again. I've seen in my family and all families around me. So children is your only quiet harbor of hope and joy.

jasflowers · 16/01/2024 13:17

CwmYoy · 16/01/2024 09:03

@apples24 "Are you willing to have a stroke before the age of 40?"

I'm in my 70s and a wheelchair user. However, I wasn't when planning our family.

Can you not see there is the world of difference between life changing events after having well-planned children and planning to bring them into a world of poverty?

Yes i can see that.

However, if not now, you may well need carers, you need a well stocked supermarket, delivery drivers, porters etc etc

Many of these people didn't grow up in a well managed MC family.

So who will do the jobs we all rely on? MC families don't aspire for their children to work at Asda or even Waitrose

Technology might be able to do some jobs but tech littered with amazing new horizons that never for fill their promise.

LardyCakeAgain · 16/01/2024 15:41

However, if not now, you may well need carers, you need a well stocked supermarket, delivery drivers, porters etc etc. Many of these people didn't grow up in a well managed MC family.

I beg your pardon??? 🤣🤣🤣 I know people from all walks of life who've worked in retail, me included, from theatre luvvies to mums who need work around school hours.

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 16/01/2024 16:02

Any more? They never did!

This is a smash and grab government, only in it for themselves and their mates.

Trying to cling to power as long as they can to further asset strip the country.

A government elected in order to achieve Brexit, which was motivated by a desire to be able to shaft working people for self enrichment, never had working families interests at heart.

Shouldgetupearlier · 16/01/2024 16:09

.

Alicesmagicmushroom · 16/01/2024 16:41

@GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing Smash and grab, is the perfect descriptor

Kpo58 · 16/01/2024 17:36

Soozikinzii · 16/01/2024 10:47

Wouldn't it be better if it was 15 hours for 3 years than the 30 hours for 1 and 15 for 1 ? It seems odd how that works ?

Anything under 30 hours is pretty unhelpful. What kind of job is going to let you work 3 hours per day (term time only) minus the time needed to get to and from the nursery?

Dinner lady is out because you need to work at lunchtimes and 15 hours placements are mornings or afternoons only.

Loudhousefun · 16/01/2024 17:49

Childcare, nursery workers etc all underpaid and undervalued not seen to be desirable career wise and little room for progression professionally. Nurseries are struggling to recruit well trained staff and quality of childcare will continue to suffer. Everyone who works with children in this country is underpaid. The fault lies 100 percent with government and their policies

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 16/01/2024 18:11

jasflowers · 16/01/2024 13:17

Yes i can see that.

However, if not now, you may well need carers, you need a well stocked supermarket, delivery drivers, porters etc etc

Many of these people didn't grow up in a well managed MC family.

So who will do the jobs we all rely on? MC families don't aspire for their children to work at Asda or even Waitrose

Technology might be able to do some jobs but tech littered with amazing new horizons that never for fill their promise.

You have a poor view of the middle class don't you??

The majority of parents, regardless of class, want their children to be happy. Yes, most would prefer them to have a job that means they don't have to worry about money. But if working in ASDA makes my child happy, I'm fully supportive.

OutsideLookingOut · 16/01/2024 18:15

jasflowers · 16/01/2024 13:17

Yes i can see that.

However, if not now, you may well need carers, you need a well stocked supermarket, delivery drivers, porters etc etc

Many of these people didn't grow up in a well managed MC family.

So who will do the jobs we all rely on? MC families don't aspire for their children to work at Asda or even Waitrose

Technology might be able to do some jobs but tech littered with amazing new horizons that never for fill their promise.

Are you saying you want people born in less than ideal circumstances to take the jobs others don't want because they have too?

(Ignoring the fact that others like students, mums etc etc may want these jobs)

MumTeacherofMany · 16/01/2024 18:27

Because we're a tiny island that is overspilling...

Swipe left for the next trending thread