PIP has done exactly what it is supposed to do here; allow me access to work and education by covering some of the otherwise prohibitive costs incurred through working around (multiple) disability. That in turn means I am able to do work that benefits many others. My worth isn't measured by how much I cost, or how little I earn, but in how many others do better and use less resources as a result of what I do on very little.
I am in a wheelchair, unable to access public transport without assistance, and frequently hospitalized with lots of clear medical evidence and scans showing my deterioration. But that doesn't stop Capita etc from lying and trying to reduce my award so that I have to give up work, and it doesn't stop stupid neighbors from reporting me for benefit fraud for working or attending university. It doesn't stop colleagues or uni from speculating about what I really can or can't do and if I really deserve assistance or suggesting either I should silently manage or not be there. (Usually to do with ramps, doors, inability to reach, poor planning on their part etc.)
But I get sent home when my struggles are too visible as not fit to be on campus, but still have to pay the fees. I lose contracts through others embarrassment at seeing reality. I constantly have to hide how I am achieving things and how hard it physically is. A different type of means testing.
Despite PIP I struggle financially because the same award has to cover so, so, much and the attitude is I get help, so can earn less and work more. It's a very vicious circle.
Every time I'm in hospital for four weeks plus, or without a four week gap between being an inpatient, I lose my PIP, right at the time I need it the most to cover my rent and council tax, so the system already means tests me saying I am living elsewhere and fed, so don't need to pay for a home left empty, and can reasonably lose it if I can't save or borrow enough to see me through.
I can't start and end my day without assistance. I can't use a council carer as they can't provide set times and work limited hours, but of course have to pay an element of CT to meet the social care bill. So I have to use the carers allowance system to employ one who can come when I start and finish work, and do a seven day week. They get £76.75 a week for 40 hrs a week, which I have to top up in order to interest anyone. They in turn are means tested by not being allowed to earn more than £139 a week on top. Inevitably I can only attract the desperate or between other jobs, (and students aren't allowed) and they don't last long.
I lost my pension to divorce and will work till I die, even though he died without accessing that pension, it doesn't revert to me. At 65 I will lose my PIP and if I am lucky will qualify for the lower sums of attendance allowance, (but fear I may not, as I don't need someone with me at all times) However I can be required to remain working, available for work and job seeking, until 68 without any way of offsetting the additional costs of being a disabled worker, and in reality I will have to keep working. I've been told to invest my (already in use to keep me working) PIP now, in retraining again for WFH work to accommodate this. Working while disabled can trap you into being expected to remain able to.
No amount of saved PIP will result in there being 'more in the pot for those who genuinely need it.' It doesn't work like that, it's all about reducing numbers, not helping getting it to the 'deserving' no matter how obviously disabled you are.
For those who want to see us means tested and forced to jump through further hoops than we already do, our means and right to survive are constantly tested in many ways, so really this is about you being parsimonious and believing that not being disabled gives you the right to judge those who are, as somehow lesser for needing help. Shame on you.