@Lightatwinter Let me spell it out for you a bit more clearly:
Addicted2Kale: "Also, I'm fed up of reading how I must be compassionate about their heroic quests to flee the war torn, third world apocalypse that is France. This is all rubbish." This post obviously refers to asylum seekers.
Addicted2KAle: "I am not arguing whether "uncontrolled" immigration is right or wrong. It's Irrelevant. I am saying it's government policy to increase immigration, irrespective of who's in power, because our birth rate and worker base is decreasing." Continues the conversation and therefore also refers to asylum seekers.
Begsthequestion: "Sounds like great replacement bollocks to me. Which is a racist conspiracy theory". Continues the conversation without changing the subject from asylum seekers.
Lightatwinter: "No it doesn’t! It sounds like economics! There are vital sectors, like the care home sectors, that are heavily reliant on people from overseas to fill posts. That’s not ‘replacement’, it’s that they can’t find enough UK citizens who are willing to do these jobs!" Your response.
Perhaps I am 'hard of understanding' because I can't see where, in the context of a thread about asylum seekers, the subject was changed from asylum seekers to general immigration. Maybe it was just in your imagination?