CyberCritical
Not really, they've chosen a job that requires them to work in a specific environment, with specific equipment and with face to face contact with their end users.
I have chosen a job that requires internet access and a device capable of accessing the internet. I need no contact with other people in a face to face environment and no peripheral equipment.
I chose that job for many reasons. Working in an office would be completely unnecessary, inflexible, inconvenient and a ridiculous waste of money for the company I work for.
@WeAreBorg
"True, but I can’t see people wanting to do these jobs in future when there’s no incentive. If you’ve got the choice of fannying about at home in your onesie all day tapping on a keyboard, or driving for 90 minutes to be vomited on for 10 hours, then no normal person is going for the latter. I’m getting old, I want people to look after me! I want decent people to teach my kids! I want to be driven around by competent train drivers!"
I don't see that happening, jobs attract different people based on their skills sets, interests, personalities.
Some people flourish working in isolation, others need people around them to interact with.
I'm pretty certain most doctors, nurses and train drivers wouldn't want to be at home on 8hrs of Teams meeting, writing policy documents or discussing cybersecurity, governance, risk and compliance but that works for me. They probably wouldn't want the responsibility of making decisions about multi-million £ technology purchases or convincing clients that we can meet their info sec and data governance requirements.
Most of us working at home, aren't "fannying about in our onesies all day tapping a keyboard.".