No, I don't want it to be said in the same way people say, Jesus Christ! Without any care to what they are actually saying.
I particularly dislike the habit that some people have of saying "Jesus wept" - so they can smugly 'inform' you that they are not actually blaspheming, but are just 'quoting the Bible' - when it's clearly not in any context of John 11 in the slightest.
Hasn’t the pope said it’s the same God? And surely the same name, which literally means the God denotes they are the same?
The pope speaks for Catholicism, but he isn't the accepted authority on all matters to do with Christianity by a very, very great number of Christians.
The bible was comprised hundreds of years after jesus’s death through much oral history,
Have you told the Jewish people that their Torah is significantly under 2,000 years old? You may just find that they very strongly disagree.
So they think it's a different god? A different Moses? A different Abraham? A different Noah? A lot of coincidences there.
Yet the starkest difference - the most basic Christian belief that the Christian God sent Jesus His Son and the Muslim belief that Allah has begotten none - can be brushed away as irrelevant, just because they reference some of the same historical characters?
Would you say that, if Mary Beard wrote a book about the Romans, that must necessarily mean she was publishing a work of solid fundamentalist Christian literature, on the grounds that the Bible also speaks of the Romans in a historical context?
It makes it clears in the Bible that 'God' isn't the actual name of God. It's used more as a title, which isn't as clear when translated into other languages. Just because Christians usually refer to Him as 'God' doesn't mean that people of other faiths who refer to 'God' - in any language - are necessarily referencing the same deity.
If a MNer uses the phrase 'my husband', nobody reading it automatically assumes that she must be referring to their husband, just because they also happen to refer to their own spouse as 'my husband'.