Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

School overreacted ?

184 replies

JimmyJam2019 · 08/10/2023 00:04

Child is barely 7, had full weight for school racism policy applied to them for calling an 11yo a poo. On the playground daring each other to call the big kids rude words. Older kid reported child for racist comment, can school not use some common sense, the kid is 7 and has no clue about racism.

OP posts:
saraclara · 08/10/2023 10:15

piintheski · 08/10/2023 09:48

Other children are entitled to pass without being shouted at, intimidated and insulted. In the adult world this would be considered a criminal assault, if reported.

I am a teacher, and have taught in some of London's roughest comps, and this is not normal or acceptable behaviour

I'm a teacher too. And I can safely say that you don't teach six year olds.

Should they be told off for running round laughing and shouting poo, willy and bum? Yes. Is it a criminal assault? No. Was this child being racist? I'll put my money on no. But since the older child felt targeted, OP's child should have had a calm conversation from their teacher about why it was perceived that way and why it matters.
Two days isolation was disproportionate and way less effective than a conversation would have been.

Goldbar · 08/10/2023 10:20

saraclara · 08/10/2023 09:33

The child is six. All he needed was taking in one side and the teacher explaining that a) running round calling people poo is silly and b) it's particularly bad to call someone with brown skin a poo, because they could think you're saying it's because their skin is brown.

A two day suspension is far less effective and will lead to resentment. It will also be counter productive because a six year old sees things very simply and will probably blame the boy who reported him (and possibly start resenting other people of similar colour).

Action needs to be proportionate. This wasn't

I agree. Of course the school should take it very seriously and depending on the circumstances it could amount to racism. But these are primary school kids... surely the school's first response should be dialogue and explanation, not harsh punishment.

Thisweeksname · 08/10/2023 10:20

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Mariposista · 08/10/2023 10:30

TheLongGloriesOfTheWinterMoon · 08/10/2023 10:02

Isolation for 2 days for a first offence is indeed very harsh.

Makes you wonder what else has been going on.

Especially for such a young child. One missed playtime maybe. Isolation for full days is never normally done until secondary school.

Hercisback · 08/10/2023 10:30

The child was 7 fgs. Not secondary age.

A two day isolation is completely disproportionate. If your ds was punished, so should the rest of the children.

As for those saying 6yos don't find poo funny, they really do. Especially when together, every other joke is poo, fart, bum or willy.

Finteq · 08/10/2023 10:37

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

😂

Goldbar · 08/10/2023 10:44

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

The two situations aren't the same though. Our society is characterised by systemic racism, power imbalances and racist messaging around skin colour, all of which mean that the impact of the insult is likely to differ depending on the identity of victim and aggressor.

That doesn't mean that the school's response was appropriate, but I don't think it's right to put this down as just kids being silly either.

Raineverywhere · 08/10/2023 10:46

Intent cant be assessed, can it, only perception, so the child needs to learn this.

That's just not true @piintheski .
The concept of intent is crucial in criminal law, for example, and it absolutely is assessed.

NoLikeyNoLightey · 08/10/2023 10:47

Bookish88 · 08/10/2023 08:57

Ok, but with this example, what was the context of how it was said? And how old the child? If younger primary age, I'd have assumed they were simply making a factual statement based on observation. It's not automatically racist.

A factual statement? Young kids know that saying someome looks like the colour of shit isn't nice. When I was in year 1, another kid told me I looked like mud because they know mud isn't nice.

I always find these threads futile as they're usually full of people who have never experienced racism.

piintheski · 08/10/2023 10:51

Raineverywhere · 08/10/2023 10:46

Intent cant be assessed, can it, only perception, so the child needs to learn this.

That's just not true @piintheski .
The concept of intent is crucial in criminal law, for example, and it absolutely is assessed.

not in a school
not in a complaint
not in a police investigation

maybe in a court of law, but that is totally irrelevant here

Goldbar · 08/10/2023 10:52

NoLikeyNoLightey · 08/10/2023 10:47

A factual statement? Young kids know that saying someome looks like the colour of shit isn't nice. When I was in year 1, another kid told me I looked like mud because they know mud isn't nice.

I always find these threads futile as they're usually full of people who have never experienced racism.

Indeed.

Would saying that a white child's skin looked like the colour of vomit be ok?

saraclara · 08/10/2023 10:56

Young kids know that saying someome looks like the colour of shit isn't nice.

We don't know that that was the child's intent though. As has been said many times, kids love yelling words like poo, willy etc for no other reason than that they're funny and rude to kids of that age.

OP has confirmed that her son and his friends were shouting poo to a whole bunch of kids, so it doesn't appear targeted at all. Which is why an explanatory conversation from a teacher should have been the end of it.

Thisweeksname · 08/10/2023 11:03

Actually there are many incidences of racism directed at white children. Particularly in schools which are predominantly non-white. My friend works in an inner city school and most of the racial issues occur with insults directed at black children by Asian children.

Dramatic · 08/10/2023 11:05

piintheski · 08/10/2023 10:51

not in a school
not in a complaint
not in a police investigation

maybe in a court of law, but that is totally irrelevant here

It's not irrelevant at all. The op has already stated they were calling loads of kids poo so the skin colour was not a factor.

Raineverywhere · 08/10/2023 11:05

piintheski · 08/10/2023 10:51

not in a school
not in a complaint
not in a police investigation

maybe in a court of law, but that is totally irrelevant here

We assess intent all the time in our day-to-day lives @piintheski. Or at least try to. It's interwoven with our perception of things.

Dramatic · 08/10/2023 11:07

piintheski · 08/10/2023 10:51

not in a school
not in a complaint
not in a police investigation

maybe in a court of law, but that is totally irrelevant here

It's also relevant in a whole host of other situations in a primary school, for example, kids are playing football and someone gets hit in the face accidently during a game Vs a child picking up a football and hitting someone in the face with it purposely. Intent is hugely important

MumblesParty · 08/10/2023 11:21

TheLongGloriesOfTheWinterMoon · 08/10/2023 09:51

The OP has explained this.
The other children were using it as a childish insult to white children. Various white children.

Her son only used it to insult the black child.

I’m not sure where you got that from. My understanding was that the little kids were running up to the big kids saying words like poo, bum, willy randomly. Where did OP say that her child specifically targeted the black kid?

It’s a silly game, and one that younger kids should be taught not to play. But singling out one child for significant punishment, just because the child he ran up to happened to have dark skin, is ridiculous.

They should be taught that calling other kids names, in general, is wrong. Labelling a child racist, when he probably barely noticed the skin colour, is excessive.

Natbro · 08/10/2023 11:23

Only way I could see this as racist if its an asian boy and you son called him"apu" like from the simpsons.

PikachuEars · 08/10/2023 11:32

Oysterbabe · 08/10/2023 09:48

He sounds like a very young 7 year old, that's more reception level behaviour. Why doesn't he know about racism? I think my DD was 4 when she asked what a Black Live Matter sign meant. He should be aware of it.

He’ll have covered it at school no doubt, as had my 6yo. It still took some explaining to help him join the dots between the stuff he had learned about Rosa Parks etc and an impulsive comment made in the playground.

Barney60 · 08/10/2023 11:35

This is silly.
Kids are kids, daring each other to say what younger children think are naughty/rude words to older kids /adults is part of growing up.
I remember my children saying and calling each other poo, said because they thought it was a naughty word.
I think the child who reported it saying it was racist is in the wrong, he needs to be taught not everything said to him is meant in that way.
School over reacted by far, they should just had an assembly next day saying its wrong to call others names.

kermitsmua · 08/10/2023 11:38

A 7yo will have been taught about racism in school in within lessons, whether it be about Rosa Parkes, Windrush etc.
But, it sounds like the OPs son said "poo" as a rude word which was interchangeable with willy, bum etc.
The school are being ridiculous and I'd put in a complaint.

BlueYonder57 · 08/10/2023 11:44

If you haven't taught your child good behaviour and they think that insulting anyone is acceptable, then it's great the school is stepping up and doing what you haven't. At the age of 7 a child may not have a full comprehension of bigotry, but they are definitely old enough to understand the basics and to undertsand that it is not something adults condone.

I find it difficult to believe that a primary school puts a child into two days isolation over one incident.

kittensinthekitchen · 08/10/2023 11:46

Did your child call another kid a poo, or did he tell a brown kid he looked like a poo?

I can see why the second example could be termed as racist.

But why does your seven year old know nothing about racism?

CecilyP · 08/10/2023 12:04

piintheski · 08/10/2023 09:48

Other children are entitled to pass without being shouted at, intimidated and insulted. In the adult world this would be considered a criminal assault, if reported.

I am a teacher, and have taught in some of London's roughest comps, and this is not normal or acceptable behaviour

Thankfully, you haven’t taught in infants school! At least I hope not anyway! You wouldn’t seriously expect a bunch Y7s to dare each other to shout poo bum willy to a group of 6th formers. Though I’m sure you must have heard worse language in in secondary, rough or otherwise!

Dramatic · 08/10/2023 12:07

kittensinthekitchen · 08/10/2023 11:46

Did your child call another kid a poo, or did he tell a brown kid he looked like a poo?

I can see why the second example could be termed as racist.

But why does your seven year old know nothing about racism?

I don't think my 7 year old knows a huge amount about racism to be honest.

Swipe left for the next trending thread