Woman stripped and left topless in a cell!

[Dovetail40]

This is disturbing to read. I hope a proper investigation is carried and the missing time videos are found so she knows exactly what happened to her.

Sky news Greater Manchester Police

The RTA is about the control of motor vehicles (etc) and will not allow an individual to avoid responsibility when the individual has a duty under the act to be in control, the DPA is about the control of data and will not allow an individual to avoid responsibility when the individual has a duty under the act to be in control.

Why would legislation allow an individual have the ability to claim that although they have a duty to control they can not be responsibility with failure to control?

They are not failing to control if they use software which is fully DPA compliant.

For the RTA - John has not implemented the software

You have just reasoned out why software can not be deemed in control of driving why is software in control of data different?

One is the Road traffic Act the other is the Data Protection Act
They are two completely different types of legislation.

What shockingly bad training your employer is providing

For the RTA - John has not implemented the software

For DPA who controls the implementation of the software?

The implementation of the software into the database - will be the database company. They will control the development of the meta-data behind the software.

What shockingly bad training your employer is providing.
One is the Road traffic Act the other is the Data Protection Act
They are two completely different types of legislation.

Whats shocking about highlighting that they are two separate acts?

One is the Road traffic Act the other is the Data Protection Act
They are two completely different types of legislation.

Basic principles are not.
But as your employer has allowed a training gap it would be understandable why you may be having difficulties.

Let me rephrase the question

For DPA who controls the implementation of the software into a police station?

The basic principles are not the same - its two different legislations.
Is it the same for a contract killer?

For DPA who controls the implementation of the software into a police station?
The software company or their agents

For DPA who controls the implementation of the software into a police station?
The software company or their agents

how do the company gain access to secure locations within the station?

They are given security access to implement the software

how do the company gain security access to secure locations within the station?

They get security clearance off the person responsible for security access for that specific area.

Its the same way we get cleaning staff, or painters, or new carpets, or vehicle recovery for any broken down police cars at the station. etc etc

@Felix125 you trawling these boards must be a full time job. Christ on a bike.

Hibiscrubbed
I'm answering posts by AnSolas

Besides - other posters are on here a lot more than I am.
And I'm off work at the moment, so I am sat with a nice hot coffee whilst it rains outside.

They get security clearance off the person responsible for security access for that specific area.

Can you name the "organisation" responsible for security access for that specific area in a police station?

Capita

What is "Capita"

You wanted the name of the organisation responsible for security access for that specific area in a police station?

The name of the company is Capita PLC

Ok so you believe that Capita PLC a non-government for profit company controls the police stations in the UK?

For how long have your held this beleif?

I didn't say they 'control' the police stations.

Most police stations are PFI buildings.
You asked for the name of the organisation responsible for security access.

As Capita control the building, they will have control on who has access to it.

Ok so you believe that Capita PLC a non-government for profit company controls the police stations in the UK by controling the people who access the building?

For how long have your held this belief?

Its a PFI building. The building maintenance and its security is down to Capita.
Capita in essence own the building.

I have held this belief ever since we moved into the building.

For example, my car parking pass for me to get into the car park has to be applied for through Capita.

So what other elements of your job are controled by a non-government for profit company?

The police buildings
The police cars
Vehicle maintenance
Tyre services
Breakdown services
Boarding up
Recovery agents
Undertakers
The property storage facility
The document storage facility
Custody Detention Officers
Probation workers
Immigration Workers
Prisoner handling team
Front desk staff
The cleaners
The maintenance crew
The mental health team
The appropriate adult service
The sexual offence resource centre & staff
The training department
First Aid trainers
Self defence trainers
The coroners
Digital investigation team
SOCO
Stores
Air support
Drone suppliers
Uniform suppliers
Stab vest suppliers
Boot suppliers

The list can go on...........

Oops audit fail