Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Why so much fuss over Stella Braverman?

930 replies

lastminutepanicking · 22/05/2023 17:03

I’m just wondering who on earth cares? Can’t understand why this is such big news.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Roussette · 23/05/2023 09:26

Alltheprettyseahorses · 23/05/2023 08:48

It is possible and they are frequently held for slebs etc.

Could you show me a link? I have looked through two pages of google and cannot find this facility.

I have shown above how a well known actor and James Blunt had to join everyone else on Zoom. I'm sure they would've done one to one if it were available, rather than have the piss taken out of them!

pointythings · 23/05/2023 09:27

@AnarchoTyrannosaurus an expert in how the Civil Service works because she works there. There's two on this thread now. Funny how the Suella fans are allowed to posit any scenario they want in defence of their heroine, but when someone comes on here to challenge them, they're basically accused of lying by the likes of you. Hmm

IClaudine · 23/05/2023 09:27

AnarchoTyrannosaurus · 23/05/2023 09:24

Another expert...
🤣

I honestly don't give a toss if you don't believe me, sweetie.

Alltheprettyseahorses · 23/05/2023 09:28

They all just got on with it and faced the consequences - didn't lie about it
Not so Ms Braverman that's the difference - she's brought all this on herself

Wait a minute - when did Braverman lie or refuse to face consequences? I know her SPAD denied any speeding but it's not their place to say, it wasn't fair on them to ask them about it. But Braverman? There doesn't appear to be any attempt to avoid consequences and I certainly haven't seen any actual reports outside professional outrage although I'm more than happy to be corrected because it stung a little having to tell my relative I was wrong and they were right.

Hippyhippybake · 23/05/2023 09:31

There is widespread press coverage confirming that yes, private speed awareness courses are available for an additional fee.

MrsSkylerWhite · 23/05/2023 09:31

Because where the law is concerned, the buck stops with her. She allegedly tried to manipulate the civil service for personal benefit, having already broken the ministerial code once before. Standards and ethics in public office matter very much.

Putting that aside, she’s incompetent and her dog whistle politics are disgraceful and she ought to go for those reasons alone.

Must be horrible to go through life so full of suspicion and mistrust.

Alltheprettyseahorses · 23/05/2023 09:31

Roussette · 23/05/2023 09:26

Could you show me a link? I have looked through two pages of google and cannot find this facility.

I have shown above how a well known actor and James Blunt had to join everyone else on Zoom. I'm sure they would've done one to one if it were available, rather than have the piss taken out of them!

Here's a solicitor who has arranged them. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/politics/2023/may/22/inappropriate-for-braverman-to-ask-for-one-to-one-speed-course-says-motoring-solicitor

(I definitely wouldn't call Eddie Marsen a well known actor)

‘Inappropriate’ for Braverman to ask for one-to-one speed course, says motoring solicitor

Home secretary should instead have been upfront about her speeding last summer, says Nick Freeman

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/politics/2023/may/22/inappropriate-for-braverman-to-ask-for-one-to-one-speed-course-says-motoring-solicitor

CabernetSauvignon · 23/05/2023 09:32

AnarchoTyrannosaurus · 22/05/2023 17:33

How on earth could she have taken a speeding awareness course with members of the public. There would be risks around security, not to mention her being recorded / taped. She should have the choice to do the speed awareness course the same as anybody else, but for the reasons above she had no choice but to take the points instead.

How would an online speeding course risk her security? Would it really matter if she was recorded if she was paying attention and did the course properly?

IClaudine · 23/05/2023 09:33

This feels like Johnson and the pot plants all over again. 🪴🪴🪴 People will excuse and excuse and excuse the terrible behaviour of this rancid government. It is just pointless arguing with such people.

Iwasafool · 23/05/2023 09:35

Alltheprettyseahorses · 23/05/2023 08:44

I argued with a relative over this when the news first came out because I thought she'd done something wrong. Turns out I was talking bollocks and didn't have a clue what happened. There is literally no problem here (apart from the speeding, there's no excuse for that, Burnham and Welby have just been done for it too, what is going on with all these idiots?).

121 courses are available and it's perfectly reasonable to ask advice from your colleagues whether they are civil servants or not. Can you imagine the awful robotic office atmosphere? Braverman coming out of a meeting with Sunak and saying to her PS 'OMG he's a right bellend, I thought I was going to explode, do us a favour and make me a cuppa with 5 sugars, I need it, and pass those chocolate biscuits.' 'Seen anything good on Netflix? I'm on my own tomorrow and want to watch telly' 'My fella wants a dog and I don't, wasn't your auntie in the same situation - how did they work round it?' No, Suella, it's all against the ministerial code to make personal requests and ask advice. Asking someone if they know anything about 121 speeding courses (which are available) is as trivial as the rest.

I can't imagine anyone going to the cabinet office if she'd just said, "Can you do 1 to 1 speed awareness courses?" It sounds more plausible that she asked someone to sort it for her which is quite a different thing.

If 1 to 1 courses are available why didn't she book one, surely the Home Secretary should be able to do that, if it is beyond her abilities we have very serious stuff to worry about.

jgw1 · 23/05/2023 09:36

IClaudine · 23/05/2023 09:33

This feels like Johnson and the pot plants all over again. 🪴🪴🪴 People will excuse and excuse and excuse the terrible behaviour of this rancid government. It is just pointless arguing with such people.

Some posters are so vociferous in their defence of cake and speed that all they do is prolong these threads, which only serves to make people more angry with the government. Do those posters work for the Labour party?

Efacsen · 23/05/2023 09:37

Alltheprettyseahorses · 23/05/2023 09:28

They all just got on with it and faced the consequences - didn't lie about it
Not so Ms Braverman that's the difference - she's brought all this on herself

Wait a minute - when did Braverman lie or refuse to face consequences? I know her SPAD denied any speeding but it's not their place to say, it wasn't fair on them to ask them about it. But Braverman? There doesn't appear to be any attempt to avoid consequences and I certainly haven't seen any actual reports outside professional outrage although I'm more than happy to be corrected because it stung a little having to tell my relative I was wrong and they were right.

Well I guess that will be tough for you

Four times her SPAD denied that there were any speeding charges at all - did she correct him? No she didn't she let the lie stand That's a lie of omission even if she didn't ask him to do that for her

She tried to avoid the consequences - but having failed to do so had to submit

AnarchoTyrannosaurus · 23/05/2023 09:37

IClaudine · 23/05/2023 09:27

I honestly don't give a toss if you don't believe me, sweetie.

Lol

Iwasafool · 23/05/2023 09:38

Hippyhippybake · 23/05/2023 09:31

There is widespread press coverage confirming that yes, private speed awareness courses are available for an additional fee.

Well why didn't she pay for one if that's what she wanted?

AnarchoTyrannosaurus · 23/05/2023 09:45

Alltheprettyseahorses · 23/05/2023 09:31

Here's a solicitor who has arranged them. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/politics/2023/may/22/inappropriate-for-braverman-to-ask-for-one-to-one-speed-course-says-motoring-solicitor

(I definitely wouldn't call Eddie Marsen a well known actor)

That's interesting. So it is possible to have one to one courses. But that solicitor doesn't believe she should have one. But goes on to say It’s for a very tiny minority of people whose presence would cause such a distraction it would dilute the purpose of the course,

Obviously people would be distracted if she was on the same course. Just her name gets people frothing at the mouth, as this thread demonstrates.

Hippyhippybake · 23/05/2023 09:47

She asked her private secretary if they could arrange one, why the private secretary couldn’t just reply that she wasn’t able to do that as it was a private matter is beyond me.

Roussette · 23/05/2023 09:47

Hippyhippybake · 23/05/2023 09:31

There is widespread press coverage confirming that yes, private speed awareness courses are available for an additional fee.

I must be googling the wrong thing then, I googled private speed awareness courses and nothing came up

CabernetSauvignon · 23/05/2023 09:48

amylou8 · 22/05/2023 18:08

Because she's a woman of colour trying to get a handle on immigration, which has made the lefties (labour) practically implode. So in desperation a tabloid drag up some year old story about a speeding ticket, for which she paid the fine and took the points when she was told she couldn't do a private course to save face. Kier Starmer has got wind of this, cum in his pants and called for her immediate resignation.

She isn't trying to get a handle on immigration. If she was, she would invest in making Home Office systems much more efficient, and would work with the MoJ to make the Immigration Tribunal more efficient. Instead, she'd devoting her time to things like the ridiculous Rwanda proposal which costs a fortune and has achieved precisely nothing, and pronouncements designed to appeal to the right wing. Because she is way more interested in her political career than doing her job properly.

Roussette · 23/05/2023 09:48

And if it is not easy for you why couldn't Braverman do it herself?

Notonthestairs · 23/05/2023 09:49

So Braverman had the sufficient understanding & foresight to forward confidential, highly sensitive information via her private email address to an MP's wife.

But lacked the understanding to pick up a telephone and arrange a 1-2-1 course herself.

Righto.

Roussette · 23/05/2023 09:50

definitely wouldn't call Eddie Marsen a well known actor

Nor would I but the tweet was funny and he was being self deprecating!

Hippyhippybake · 23/05/2023 09:53

Rousette, it’s in the Guardian, Telegraph and iNews amongst others

Roussette · 23/05/2023 09:54

Hippyhippybake · 23/05/2023 09:53

Rousette, it’s in the Guardian, Telegraph and iNews amongst others

I am mystified as to why she couldn't book it then?

IClaudine · 23/05/2023 09:56

Kier Starmer has got wind of this, cum in his pants and called for her immediate resignation

Dear God. Is this the level of discourse Tories are slithering down to?

Hippyhippybake · 23/05/2023 09:57

There are so many cases of the civil service being grotesquely negligent such as the recent case whereby a criminal gang were buying up expiring passports and renewing them with the photo of a convicted criminal (who obviously looked nothing like the previous photo). There never seems to be any comeback for actions like these despite posing a huge security threat.

Swipe left for the next trending thread