Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

£162 million to bury the queen

202 replies

StoneofDestiny · 18/05/2023 15:19

£162 Million to bury the Queen! AIBU to think this could have been better spent improving Public Services like the NHS, Education, Housing etc

OP posts:
PurpleFlower1983 · 18/05/2023 19:53

Fruitful82 · 18/05/2023 15:21

I think the queen would have been appalled by the money spent.

a frugal understated woman, but they disrespected her by doing what they would have known she would have felt very uncomfortable about

Didn’t she organise it?

DazzleMaRazzle · 18/05/2023 19:55

Parky04 · 18/05/2023 17:05

She should of had a Direct Cremation - only £995!

Imagine the telly advert?
A funeral fit for a Queen 😂

PurpleFlower1983 · 18/05/2023 19:59

msmatcha · 18/05/2023 18:55

This amount is no surprise. We won't see the like again. We were on the world stage. Our nation deserved this.

I agree. There will never be another event like it. She is up there with Elizabeth I and Queen Victoria in status and deserved what she had.

Toddlerteaplease · 18/05/2023 20:16

@Vitriolinsanity landrover surely!

Vitriolinsanity · 18/05/2023 21:05

@Toddlerteaplease I went for deluxe, but you're right in that you can't beat a Landy.

The coffin could have had a folded headscarf atop.

Moreorlessmentallystable · 18/05/2023 21:38

Fruitful82 · 18/05/2023 15:21

I think the queen would have been appalled by the money spent.

a frugal understated woman, but they disrespected her by doing what they would have known she would have felt very uncomfortable about

🤣🤣🤣 frugal?

suminagashi · 18/05/2023 21:54

StoneofDestiny · 18/05/2023 16:19

Moaning? Taxpayers have a perfect right to say how they think their taxes should be spent! You might disagree, your view is not the only view.

Unfortunately the cost have only been published now - so its new information.
we still have to get the final cost of the Coronation - that will be enormous, and it's said Prince Williams Coronation is already in planning.

Yes, moaning. I’m also a taxpayer and have a perfect right to say how my tax should be spent. Yours is not the only view you know, and I do disagree and think you’re just a big moaner 😂

Also not arsed about how much William will cost for his as I’ll probably be dead. No doubt when the Queen was crowned there were people bitching but as time passed they passed into oblivion along with their moaning opinions. The memory of the spectacle was what was remembered.

poshme · 18/05/2023 22:04

@MintJulia I agree

JMSA · 18/05/2023 22:06

Fruitful82 · 18/05/2023 15:21

I think the queen would have been appalled by the money spent.

a frugal understated woman, but they disrespected her by doing what they would have known she would have felt very uncomfortable about

I think you're overestimating her.

caringcarer · 18/05/2023 22:16

That amount would not make a dent in education or NHS budgets. She was the Queen for many years and worked way past retirement age. She deserved her state funeral. I quite enjoyed watching it.

Ghastisflabbered · 18/05/2023 23:32

Haywirecity · 18/05/2023 19:52

Which countries don't have homeless people? And foodbanks. Which western countries don't have foodbanks? I'm guessing most health services would say they're not fully staffed either. It's the same with all western economies.

So because every other economy has the same problems we should just shrug our shoulders and be ok with it?

Sure. Sounds great.

Luredbyapomegranate · 18/05/2023 23:41

Fruitful82 · 18/05/2023 15:21

I think the queen would have been appalled by the money spent.

a frugal understated woman, but they disrespected her by doing what they would have known she would have felt very uncomfortable about

You what? She signed off on it, and knew very well what it cost.

She wasn’t frugal, she kept half a dozen residences going, plus the yacht, the train, the racehorses, the houses for the kids, the bagpiper under her window every morning, etc

Realistically the money would only keep the NHS going for 5 mins and she was head of state for yonks, the funeral did get a lot of international viewing figures, so maybe it was useful.. but the RF isn’t remotely frugal.

4plusthehound · 19/05/2023 00:37

But it not just the cost of the her funeral.

We need to add the cost ofall their funerals, corronation, jubilees, taxes not paid, security for all of them, insurance and so on.

Once you start to put it all together they are very expensive indeed.

And the tourism thing does not add up - France has empty palaces that do just fine.

howdoesyourgardengrowinmay · 19/05/2023 01:59

Think of all the pot holes that could have been filled in for that sort of money. Makes me want to cry.

Haywirecity · 19/05/2023 04:26

So because every other economy has the same problems we should just shrug our shoulders and be ok with it?

No, I'm not saying that. I'm saying that if no other country has managed to achieve that, not even the higher tax countries, it might be that the solution to these problems is more complex than just finding more money.

MummyJ12 · 19/05/2023 07:40

“While the average annual cost for UK taxpayers in royal upkeep comes to around £500m a year, Brand Finance estimates the monarchy's brand contributes £2.5bn to the British economy in the same timeframe.”
Taken from The Independent 6th May 23.

MummyJ12 · 19/05/2023 07:45

The monarchy received a sovereign grant of £86m in 2020/21, making it the largest declared source of royal income. While the figure is reviewed every five years, the Sovereign Grant is normally calculated at 15% of the crown estate profits.
I’d love to know from republicans how we’d pay for a president. Where would the government get the funds from? It wouldn’t be from the Crown Estate.

Emotionalstorm · 19/05/2023 07:48

I disagree. Everyone is all doom and gloom nowadays and a bit if pomp and glamour is exactly what we need as a country.

musixa · 19/05/2023 07:50

Her family should have paid for it - they can afford it.

GCWorkNightmare · 19/05/2023 07:55

VariationsonaTheme · 18/05/2023 15:36

Lots of the costs of these things is to do with the amount of personnel needed. Those people are being paid whether they’re performing a ceremonial role like the funeral or coronation, or doing their every day job in the armed forces/police force/ ambulance crew. So it’s not all ‘extra’ expense.

We had to move 1300 people to London for 2 weeks. The hotel and overtime bills were enormous.

RavenclawDiadem · 19/05/2023 07:58

PuttingDownRoots · 18/05/2023 15:25

A massive part of that will have been security. All those World leaders and foreign monarchy flying in for example.

Of course it was.

I was in Edinburgh the day the coffin arrived from Balmoral. There were thousands and thousands of people on the Royal Mile, 4 or 5 deep in most places. At any event of that size, whether it's a funeral or New Year celebrations there will be lots of security and lots of police. And there were LOTS of police in Edinburgh, one every 10 or 15 feet down the route, on each side of the road.

It's not that the £162 million has been spent on a coffin, flowers, and a funeral tea for the family.

HumanBurrito · 19/05/2023 08:00

I don't think I'll ever see the like again in my lifetime

Chances are you will see the like again in the next ten years.

TankFlyBossW4lk · 19/05/2023 08:00

Fruitful82 · Yesterday 15:21
I think the queen would have been appalled by the money spent.

a frugal understated woman, but they disrespected her by doing what they would have known she would have felt very uncomfortable about

This is such a load of rubbish. Read And What Do You Do, by Norman Baker and educate yourself. Bet you won't though.

Haywirecity · 19/05/2023 08:01

musixa · 19/05/2023 07:50

Her family should have paid for it - they can afford it.

They should have then kept the income from it. I bet they'd have been happy with that.

Famzonhol · 19/05/2023 08:02

GCWorkNightmare · 19/05/2023 07:55

We had to move 1300 people to London for 2 weeks. The hotel and overtime bills were enormous.

Which was good for the hotels and kept money circulating in the economy.

Swipe left for the next trending thread