@MrsBennetsPoorNerves
Thank you for your considered post re the labour market in England.
I can see from the stats that yes indeed
- 50.4% of working families had both parents employed full-time
- 44.1% had the arrangement where a man was employed full-time and their partner part-time
- 2.6% where both partners were employed part-time
- 3.0% where a woman worked full-time and their partner part-time.
So not so many wonder women out there taking care of the men… and still a large number of men taking care of women.
May I direct you to a key proviso of the information imparted
The classification of full- or part-time is determined by the respondent.
Ergo there is no minimum amount of hours required to be deemed full time. One persons 30 hours part time is another’s full time. There is nothing to say whether one works 25, and the other 50…. So essentially the information is not reliable enough and the parameters need to be more clearly defined to get the full picture.
Northern Ireland full time vs part time is likewise defined by the respondent. However it is easier to see the difference between men and women more clearly - 64.3% of women are in full time work whereas it’s 89.3% of men and the average number of full time hours worked by women (33.2) is consistently below that of men (37.7) (Figure 3)…. Considering a full time contract is usually 35 hours minimum, it would suggest the data is unreliable….
https://www.nisra.gov.uk/system/files/statistics/women-in-Northern-Ireland-2020-2021.pdf
Certainly if full time can be considered 30hrs, I’m shocked; I could have done 18 less to develop a superiority complex 😁, my DH could more than halve his hours to be considered “full time”.
What can be seen from the data in England, N.I. Scotland https://www.gov.scot/publications/scotlands-labour-market-people-places-regions-protected-characteristics-statistics-annual-population-survey-2021/pages/5/#:~:text=In%202021%2C%201%2C277%2C500%20women%20aged,estimated%20at%2070.7%20per%20cent.and Wales https://www.gov.wales/labour-market-statistics-annual-population-survey-october-2021-september-2022-htmlis that a much larger proportion of women are economically inactive for family reasons, ie housewives.
We have quite a way to go to be on a par with men.
As for the women I know having husbands who are higher earners - think GP married to surgeon, physio married to anaesthetist, teacher married to accountant, nurse married to senior civil servant… that sort of thing. I have one friend who has own business and outearns DH, and another who is top of her game in health (but she is going to job share as the job is too demanding to cope with motherhood on top).
Myself and the academic would out earn husbands… however I am stuck at home as am needed as carer 🤷♀️ annoying isn’t in it, but I can cope with the DC needs better particularly the disabled one who has complex needs (and am who they want) and wouldn’t be appropriate for DH to deal with personal care of my female relative…. Not a choice at all, not at all what I want for me, but it’s a necessity at present….
I am absolutely in agreement with you that men should have an equal choice to be a SAHP, and that people shouldn’t enforce their being SAH on their partner - no way!
As far as I can see it from this thread, the girl was upfront with her boyfriend regarding her intentions and he said no thanks. She will move on and eventually find someone who is looking for what she wants. When it’s two consenting adults they can do what they want.