I see all these comments about starter homes. Three bed houses are starter homes when you've waited until you're in your mid 30's with two children because the bank decides you need 10x your earnings to buy a house you were renting at a higher monthly payment than the mortgage, for the last 2 years. You can't buy further out without being unable to work because you cannot be an hour away from your children's school, and the wrap around care is too expensive. The cheapest two bed in my city, is 8x a single persons salary (average), difficult to buy that house when your fighting to survive every month, let alone save for a deposit. Impossible for a single parent. And renting... it's £1300 a month for a three bed house in a "rubbish area" where I am. £1000 for a two bed. I am not in a wealthy area (although I am south West Midlands)
When you come from a time where you could buy a house, any home at all really, on one persons salary, at a cost of 3x your annual income, you've really got no business arguing that those who can't afford the same house, with two salarys at 8x joint annual income, don't have greater challenges than they did.
I guess you could argue that you shouldn't expect to be able to have children until you've bought a house and are financially secure. When the ages of first home ownership rising, it will become harder biologically to have children. Try living in a house without a fridge or beds for your kids now and see what social services make of that. I'm not sure they'll care much that you scrapped by to buy the dingiest property your could, just so you could buy, to move your kids into a house with no furniture, fridges or heating. Of course, that's on the assumption you can find a social worker...
Plus I'm a bit concerned about who is going to pay for the pensioners to receive their state pensions that their hard work and contributions won't even touch the sides of in terms of the costs (inflation, aging population needing more care etc) without young workers paying their taxes. It could then even go as far as to rule out anyone without any generational wealth from parenthood. But let's not have immigrants come here with their children and education and tax paying potential, that would be "ruining" our country.
There's plenty of over 50's developments, schemes for cheaper houses that boomers could retire into. They don't want those properties though... they want bungalows, if they are going to downsize at all. Completely missing the irony in deciding those properties aren't to their taste, whilst telling the rest of us that we should be grateful for whatever home we can get.
I'm sure that it was hard for older generations. Even harder at times, but generally speaking, you've come out of the harder times in a better position than I can hope to. I don't even want to imagine how much harder it is on the generations below me, it's untenable.