Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Did I just hear Sunak promise to investigate inappropriate and unsafe sex education in school?

605 replies

Nimbostratus100 · 08/03/2023 12:20

Did I just hear Sunak promise to investigate inappropriate and unsafe sex education in school?

I don't really listen to priminister questions, but I was just channel hopping waiting for the kettle to boil

So IABU to dance a little dance?

YABU - no you misheard, he didn't say that/ he said it but it is meaningless

YANBU - yes you heard it, yes it means something, dance away

OP posts:
jgw1 · 09/03/2023 13:12

DuncinToffee · 09/03/2023 08:58

So there's been a series of PMQs questions complaining about 'extreme' sex education in schools.

These seem to have been kicked off a think tank founded by Tories Miriam Cates and Danny Kruger.

You will be STUNNED to learn they're not quite as advertised.

Thread:

twitter.com/mikeysmith/status/1633531980733186048?t=ZauBRFxhv2WQRXA9XEuM_g&s=19

I'm amazed. From the same people who brought you £350million extra a week for the NHS, who would have thought it!

lifeturnsonadime · 09/03/2023 13:14

jgw1 · 09/03/2023 13:12

I'm amazed. From the same people who brought you £350million extra a week for the NHS, who would have thought it!

So why don't you think children in school should now be safeguarded from inappropriate sex ed which teaches gender as fact , queer theory and kink?

You keep coming over to bash the Tories and we all know they aren't blameless, but what do you actually think?

Do you think children should be safeguarded or not?

DuncinToffee · 09/03/2023 13:33

So pointing out inaccuracies and bias and questioning motivations means you don't care about safeguarding children?

I think it's the opposite.

lifeturnsonadime · 09/03/2023 13:37

DuncinToffee · 09/03/2023 13:33

So pointing out inaccuracies and bias and questioning motivations means you don't care about safeguarding children?

I think it's the opposite.

Do you want an investigation into what is happening in schools or don't you?

You appear to be using the report to say that the investigation is not necessary.

How is that safeguarding anyone?

7Worfs · 09/03/2023 13:37

DuncinToffee · 09/03/2023 13:33

So pointing out inaccuracies and bias and questioning motivations means you don't care about safeguarding children?

I think it's the opposite.

It’s a distraction from the thread topic - nationwide investigation into RSE.
It seems it’s long overdue and very much welcome by many.

Rainbowshit · 09/03/2023 13:39

DuncinToffee · 09/03/2023 13:33

So pointing out inaccuracies and bias and questioning motivations means you don't care about safeguarding children?

I think it's the opposite.

If you're trying to stop an investigation by accusing people of bias and questioning their motives then I would say no you don't care about safeguarding.

Have we not learned anything from Rotherham?

Hobbi · 09/03/2023 13:41

@Rainbowshit

Shall we agree that we want an investigation conducted by someone with interests of our children at heart? I personally don't believe that would include those who would ban abortion and same sex marriage, but perhaps you think fundamentalist Christians are best placed to improve the sexual health of young people.

MarshaBradyo · 09/03/2023 13:42

lifeturnsonadime · 09/03/2023 13:37

Do you want an investigation into what is happening in schools or don't you?

You appear to be using the report to say that the investigation is not necessary.

How is that safeguarding anyone?

I don’t get the reluctance. I’m assuming it’s political allegiance as it doesn’t make sense.

lifeturnsonadime · 09/03/2023 13:44

MarshaBradyo · 09/03/2023 13:42

I don’t get the reluctance. I’m assuming it’s political allegiance as it doesn’t make sense.

Well it's either that or a TRA or someone who wants queer theory or kink taught in schools.

Most would welcome an investigation into what is going on with schools. I question the motives of anyone who doesn't put the safeguarding of children first.

Rainbowshit · 09/03/2023 13:45

Hobbi · 09/03/2023 13:41

@Rainbowshit

Shall we agree that we want an investigation conducted by someone with interests of our children at heart? I personally don't believe that would include those who would ban abortion and same sex marriage, but perhaps you think fundamentalist Christians are best placed to improve the sexual health of young people.

You and I agree with that. However here are plenty who don't want any investigation at all which instantly should raise a red flag.

MarshaBradyo · 09/03/2023 13:46

lifeturnsonadime · 09/03/2023 13:44

Well it's either that or a TRA or someone who wants queer theory or kink taught in schools.

Most would welcome an investigation into what is going on with schools. I question the motives of anyone who doesn't put the safeguarding of children first.

True it could be TRAs

Rainbowshit · 09/03/2023 13:49

I would also want included in that investigation groups such as this:

www.heraldscotland.com/business_hq/23198924.anti-abortion-group-carried-dozens-school-visits/

And preferable a complete ban on external providers giving any kid of sex or relationship education to pupils. It's very clear that allowing free reign to headteachers is not working.

jgw1 · 09/03/2023 13:57

Believeitornot · 09/03/2023 12:14

Why are you so invested in the idea of making sure some kids are seeing such inappropriate materials at school? Or do you think that it is ok to try and ensure that NO kids do?

Why do you lie?

I’ve just skimmed that report and one example it gives of children drawing examples of “dick pics”. Which is pretty shocking. Then it turns out they were drawing pictures of things that they had already been sent. Where’s the outrage at the fact that these kids have been sent pornographic material, unsolicited and there is no mechanism to stop them receiving said materials?

So what is happening in that instance is children are being given a space to report and discuss what they have been exposed to on social media. Nothing is being done to tackle that problem.

We need to tackle the problem of porn and it’s harmful effects and we need to talk to our children about it. They’re seeing it whether we like it or not and it breaks my heart and makes me angry.

If everyone was taught properly that sex is for procreation and should only happen in marriages then porn would not exist and the problem you describe would be solved.

Hobbi · 09/03/2023 13:58

@Rainbowshit

These allegations are serious enough to warrant an instant investigation by Ofsted who, despite their other failings, are actually a sound source of research. Allowing the evangelicals to determine what should be taught to children regarding sex, sexuality and the ethics of relationships is not the way forward. It's strange that with so many posts on this subject, no one has any verification of this, other than hearsay. I had LGBQT+ training at a school with a well-known charity and I didn't like the obsession with trans issues and what I saw as a fundamental misunderstanding of the construct of gender. No explicit stuff but the default stance was 'boy plays with dolls, must be a trans girl' type stuff. On the other hand Ive also experienced STR training in a church school and was equally disturbed by the bigotry and dangerous messages. That is my worry - using outrageous and exaggerated claims as a Trojan horse for a new section 28, accompanied by fresh, American style abortion laws.

jgw1 · 09/03/2023 13:59

lifeturnsonadime · 09/03/2023 13:14

So why don't you think children in school should now be safeguarded from inappropriate sex ed which teaches gender as fact , queer theory and kink?

You keep coming over to bash the Tories and we all know they aren't blameless, but what do you actually think?

Do you think children should be safeguarded or not?

Children in schools are already safeguarded from the things you describe, which no one has provided any evidence of actually happening in UK schools.

Hobbi · 09/03/2023 14:00

@jgw1

"If everyone was taught properly that sex is for procreation and should only happen in marriages then porn would not exist and the problem you describe would be solved."

Married people don't watch pornography? Ok.

FourTeaFallOut · 09/03/2023 14:00

Absolutely, and I have already stated in this thread that I wouldn't accept sex education provided through the lens of any religious group.

What we are taking about is how do we chart the mechanisms by which third parties achieve access to our children during the school day and how are their approaches and teaching materials being held to account?

The answer is that we can't if people demand that we have no place recording, knowing and in some cases, objecting to ideologies sneaking in through the back door.

jgw1 · 09/03/2023 14:01

Hobbi · 09/03/2023 13:41

@Rainbowshit

Shall we agree that we want an investigation conducted by someone with interests of our children at heart? I personally don't believe that would include those who would ban abortion and same sex marriage, but perhaps you think fundamentalist Christians are best placed to improve the sexual health of young people.

Religions, particularly the more fundamental adherrents to them, have a fantastic record of safeguarding people from sexual crimes.

Hobbi · 09/03/2023 14:02

@jgw1

Apologies if I missed the sarcasm - can't believe how many on here are happy to hand over SRR to fundamentalist religious groups.

Gymnopedie · 09/03/2023 14:07

Porn is out there. The kids will see it…. Would you rather they were talking about it in the playground with their friends in secondary school, with no adult to step in? Clips doing the rounds on WhatsApp etc?

I think it is entirely appropriate to discuss porn in schools in the context of consent, boundaries, and the extent to which porn is a fantasised representation of usual sexual relationships. If you do it that way, then they have the tools to view (in every sense) porn for what it is.

But teaching the kids about how to recreate it 'safely', giving them an exercise in creative thinking to work out how two different body parts could be used in a sexually stimulating way, then completely contradicts any message about boundaries because it tells them that it's normal and fine.

lifeturnsonadime · 09/03/2023 14:08

jgw1 · 09/03/2023 13:59

Children in schools are already safeguarded from the things you describe, which no one has provided any evidence of actually happening in UK schools.

Yes they have, you reject it because you put your bias above the safeguarding of children.

MarshaBradyo · 09/03/2023 14:09

lifeturnsonadime · 09/03/2023 14:08

Yes they have, you reject it because you put your bias above the safeguarding of children.

I think a few on the thread are doing this.

jgw1 · 09/03/2023 14:09

Rainbowshit · 09/03/2023 13:45

You and I agree with that. However here are plenty who don't want any investigation at all which instantly should raise a red flag.

Does that come from the same school of evidence as that eleventy billion genders are being taught in RSE in schools?

lifeturnsonadime · 09/03/2023 14:10

Hobbi · 09/03/2023 14:02

@jgw1

Apologies if I missed the sarcasm - can't believe how many on here are happy to hand over SRR to fundamentalist religious groups.

That isn't what is happening.

What is happening is an investigation.

You don't want that to happen because you want children to be taught gender and queer theory and kink in school.

If you wanted safeguarding of children you would be pro- a government investigation in to what is happening rather than trying to argue against it.

Rainbowshit · 09/03/2023 14:12

Hobbi · 09/03/2023 14:02

@jgw1

Apologies if I missed the sarcasm - can't believe how many on here are happy to hand over SRR to fundamentalist religious groups.

Can you evidence that? Most people on this thread are asking for a proper investigation to be carried out and external providers to be banned or have proper scrutiny. Not hand the reins over to another bunch of lunatics.