The convicted comes across as having a disgusting and entitled attitude which makes her actions unreasonable. From the footage, she sees the cyclist coming and doesn’t move out of the way, but purposefully blocks the pavement with her large stature and starts swearing and making shoving motions, forcing the cyclist on the road in that very second. Was that appropriate at that very moment when cars were approaching at speed?
Regardless of how you feel about cyclists on pavements, the pedestrian was completely lacking in common sense here. She knows there were cars approaching behind the cyclist at speed, so forcing a cyclist into the pavement at that second would lead to a collision and potential death. If I see a cyclist on the pavement, it might anger me but I’m not going to start swearing or attempting to get them hit by a car. There’s other ways I can express my anger that doesn’t involve physical injury. This woman’s behaviour was extraordinarily bad. Then to swan off to the shop afterwards whilst the lady you just shouted at/shoved is laying critically ill after you forced her off the pavement?
Ultimately the court would have seen the full footage that isn’t cut short, and would have had a more accurate depiction of this woman’s actions to arrive at a manslaughter conviction. The woman looks like she is shoving the cyclist, even if that wasn’t her intention. Her hand gestures, particularly from the point of view of the cyclist, caused this collision.