They have 3 months PAID holidays only work 9-4pm, no dangerous or really bad working conditions, great job security, good pensions, They had pay rises last year up to 8%!!!
😂
🙄
This has been done ad nauseum, but:
We're paid for working 37.5h/ week, 195 days/ year. The point of a salary is that income is the same across the year, so it gets split over the 12 pay days. So while we get paid every month, we don't get paid extra days on top of that.
We work, in actual fact, anywhere between 50-70h/week. But only get paid for 37.5h. That is an issue, even if it's technically not overtime, it's a hell of a lot of unpaid hours. Oh, and I work holidays, too - half-term I came in for a full day for revision lessons, then worked on lesson resourcing for at least half my holiday because we don't have enough qualified teachers in our department, so someone has to prepare stuff that a cover teacher can do without knowing anything about the subject. Which, in Physics, is quite a job in itself.
No dangerous work conditions?
Try being verbally assaulted almost daily for something as unreasonable as telling students to open their books. Try being in charge of 30 students while one is throwing a table in the room. The latter happened only last week, because there is no specialist provision for the child who really shouldn't be in mainstream and who has trashed rooms multiple times. Or having a kid bring in a machete. Or a chair being kicked at you, which breaks your ankle. Or have a kid make death threats while you're pregnant - all of these past incidents with colleagues just in my school.
No bad working conditions?
Imagine being told that the amount and quality of work of your teenagers is completely down to you and your excellence, which is measured every few months on a single lesson you teach with a random set and exam results, which depend on the child's brilliance on a single day. Down to you and you only and factors such as the child's home life, potential homelessness, drug use, friendship fallouts, breakups, lack of food, lack of equipment, severe SEND etc. all don't get taken into account, because you should be able to control performance even if you absolutely can't change any of the above. Imagine having someone look over your shoulder all the time, pressuring you to do more and more. Imagine being responsible for whether students and their parents can be bothered to turn up at school, even if all you can realistically do is cram in a phone call. Complete lack of autonomy with a huge amount of responsibility for outcomes.
Great job security? My arse.
I am starting a new teaching job, in which I can be fired with a week's notice any time for the first six months for any or no reason at all. Even in schools which still follow the burgundy book - which are fewer and fewer thanks to academisation - you can be cast out within 6 weeks if your performance isn't deemed up to scratch.
Whether it is deemed such is mainly down to what set you teach, when you teach them and how long for - your timetable in any given year can make or break you. If you walked into most of my lessons, they are calm and orderly, because I have been lucky and have been given a lot of top sets (and yes, I am experienced and good at it). Walk into my colleague's lessons, whose timetable is mostly bottom sets, and you'd mostly see chaos - not because they're a worse teacher, but by sheer nature of their classes this year. Guess who is deemed to be underperforming?
Performance management with unreachable targets, in which we have no say, means that there is "evidence" none of us are meeting expectations of senior leaders, so if we rear our heads too much, it's easy to manage us out.
Good pensions
Well, when I started this job the pensions were great. Since then, I've been told I'll have to pay more and for longer, but my pension has been changed from final salay to career average, which means now it's worth less. The contract I once entered has been changed unilaterally and who is to say I'll see any money by the time I'll be able to get it (which also still changes all the time). Yes, employer contributions are great and more than others get, but it's still 11% of my pay that I have to contribute.
Pay rises last year up to 8%
For those just starting, yes. Everyone else got 1.5-3%; I was on 1.5%. I have not seen a pay rise anywhere near inflation for more years than I can count and my pay is now worth 25% less than it was 10 years ago. The extra money I get for departmental responsibility also hasn't seen a rise at all, so I get less and less in real terms for the job I'm doing on top of just teaching.
For the love of all that's holy, please educate yourself.