Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be sick of cashless society

612 replies

Ihatepcos · 10/01/2023 09:31

I prefer to use cash, I always have.

I find budgeting and spending so much easier. If I am tapping away on my card I think nothing of constant £3 £6 etc being spent on things I probably wouldn't buy if I was spending cash.

More and more places simply don't take cash and it's driving me mad.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
AmazonsFuckedUpFreeMusicFeature · 10/01/2023 12:49

Badbadbunny · 10/01/2023 12:14

Yes, I'm an accountant, I know how things have changed. But HMRC are more "targeted" these days, so better use of their resources.

I remember back in the 80s where tax inspectors would be real pains in the arse because of obsessing about small/trivial matters - they were real jobsworths who didn't care about size of tax being recovered - they'd happily spend a day poring over someone's "books" and walk away at the end of it having raised a tax assessment for an extra £5 - it was complete and utter madness.

Or a case involving a coal man, where the inspector spent several months checking every last piece of paper for 6 years, the guy's "work" diary for a couple of years, even driving around the route to check time it would take and mileage etc (before google maps!), checking MOT history for mileage, checking the guy's household bills, checking his passport to see if he'd been abroad on holiday. He just wouldn't accept defeat. He had to in the end, as there was nothing to see, but that was a huge waste of resources and it cost the poor guy thousands in accountancy fees just to defend himself against unfounded challenge!

HMRC are going after the bigger fish in a more controlled way based on intelligence rather than just randomly going on "fishing" expeditions. And they're getting better at it. Starting to see "trickle down" effects now and them targeting specific industries/areas. Just a shame that they still seem frightened of certain communities - they'd never touch scrap dealers and roofers back in the 80s and still won't today!

Lots of the small businesses around me would disagree incl me.
Most of us (my circle) had HMRC on our backs recently for wither minimal mistake or suspected issue. It's madness.
Madder than Immigration and that's something imho!

sunseaandme · 10/01/2023 12:51

brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr · 10/01/2023 09:37

I was happy riding a horse everywhere and suddenly it’s all cars this and cars that

😂😂

Badbadbunny · 10/01/2023 12:52

BradfordGirl · 10/01/2023 12:39

Did you go to a private school?
My school had no computers in early 1980s. About 1884/5 they got one computer. There was a big push to get one computer in every school in the country. I never got to use it.
At university in the mid to late eighties all essays were handwritten. There was a computer suite that was only for students doing computer studies. 1989 my first job and offices all still had secretaries and word processors. It was not until 1995 I got a computer at work. I moved to a new job a couple of years later and found myself in an office with a shared secretary and no computer. Had to wait until 1998 for my next computer.
There are always go ahead firms that introduce technology early. But computers have really only been commonplace in offices for about 25 years and are far more recent in the home. For a long time only gamers and those interested in computing had home computers. They were expensive.

Plenty of elderly people can do the very basics such as send an email or use facebook but can't manage anything more complex.

No it was a bog standard comp. I left in Summer 1983 and by then they had 3 classrooms full of computers, one on every desk.

Workplace was certainly not "high tech" - we still had manual hand cranked adding machines, ledgers that we had to write by hand in ink pen, underlining in red ink, etc. Photocopier was a "page at a time one" where you had to use a piece of something like rice paper with the page on the bed and then put the rice paper with a piece of "copier" paper through a roller for the image to be transferred - it was heat transfer rather than ink. We also had a Gestetner duplicator for multiple prints of the same document in purple print which needed to be typed on special sheets that punched letter/number holes into it for the purple ink to go through!

The computers were bought purely for the time consuming "number crunching" work as the owners (both in their 60s) clearly made the decision that saving time (and therefore staff numbers) was worth their massive investment (at the time) in the computer system. They weren't used for "normal" admin nor secretarial work (cheaper wages I assume!). It would take a week to have done a manual/hand set of projections/forecasts for 3 years for a new business start-up (I remember doing them), but that could be done in a day with the computer and spreadsheet software, so massively labour saving. It was funny that the owners hadn't the faintest idea about how to use the computers, had no interest in learning, but could see the potential and payback and loved showing the end result to the client in a "look at us, we're forward thinking" way!

As for your comments about "more complex" things - apps like Monzo are remarkably simple, and are in no way any harder than Facebook to set up and use.

PlaitBilledDuckyPuss · 10/01/2023 12:52

bringmetheheadofpastaalfredo · 10/01/2023 12:44

No, you're missing the point. It's so easy to manouvere, you don't need to give your details at all!
I ahve a revolut account, it has a physical card and a virtual card on my phone. On the latter, every time I pay with it using my phone, it generates a new, one time use, card number. Nobody gets my bank account details, or my card details. Nobody can clone it or use it.

By not learning how to use these things properly and safely, you are shooting yourself in the foot. It's so easy to protect yourself from all those things your so worried about but don't actually bother to deal with.

And don't kid yourself that The Man can't find you a track you a thousand times over anyway!

You're fooling yourself; or rather allowing yourself to be fooled by marketing if you think a Revolut account can't be cloned or used by anyone else.

https://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/decision/DRN-3265894.pdf

ily0 · 10/01/2023 12:53

bringmetheheadofpastaalfredo · 10/01/2023 12:47

Wow. The paranoia! It is deliberate, but it's not sinister, it's simply that they know that a far larger percentage of people WANT to pay with card rather than cash.

🤦‍♀️ You can’t be this stupid surely?! Why don’t they allow you to pay by cash OR card in the machines?! It’s not either or?! Every time I go to the supermarket there is a long queue to use the two machines that allow cash. Why is suddenly the option to pay by cash so difficult when ALL the machines used to allow BOTH payment methods?

It’s pretty obvious to anyone with two brain cells to rub together that this is deliberate.

AmazonsFuckedUpFreeMusicFeature · 10/01/2023 12:54

ily0 · 10/01/2023 12:53

🤦‍♀️ You can’t be this stupid surely?! Why don’t they allow you to pay by cash OR card in the machines?! It’s not either or?! Every time I go to the supermarket there is a long queue to use the two machines that allow cash. Why is suddenly the option to pay by cash so difficult when ALL the machines used to allow BOTH payment methods?

It’s pretty obvious to anyone with two brain cells to rub together that this is deliberate.

Lesser security risk.
In my local shops there is always queue for card ones, not for cash ones

ily0 · 10/01/2023 12:54

It’s obvious being ordered from the top down as a way of tracking people and their spending by making it as difficult as possible to pay by cash.

workinmums · 10/01/2023 12:54

If I ran a fruit stand for about 6 months and I now know more people are likely to buy apples than oranges, Why would I deliberately buy MORE oranges?
Supermarkets are simply catering for the majority, that's all.

bringmetheheadofpastaalfredo · 10/01/2023 12:55

PlaitBilledDuckyPuss · 10/01/2023 12:52

You're fooling yourself; or rather allowing yourself to be fooled by marketing if you think a Revolut account can't be cloned or used by anyone else.

https://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/decision/DRN-3265894.pdf

Oh bless you, you don't understand any of it do you?

These people talking about their Nans who can't use a card or write an email....thats just you in another few years!

MajorCarolDanvers · 10/01/2023 12:55

This life now. You need to learn new budgeting techniques.

Itschristmastimeinthecity · 10/01/2023 12:56

AmazonsFuckedUpFreeMusicFeature · 10/01/2023 12:54

Lesser security risk.
In my local shops there is always queue for card ones, not for cash ones

In my local shops there is always queue for card ones, not for cash ones

same here

catlovingdoctor · 10/01/2023 12:56

Yanbu...I much prefer being able to use cash

bringmetheheadofpastaalfredo · 10/01/2023 12:57

ily0 · 10/01/2023 12:53

🤦‍♀️ You can’t be this stupid surely?! Why don’t they allow you to pay by cash OR card in the machines?! It’s not either or?! Every time I go to the supermarket there is a long queue to use the two machines that allow cash. Why is suddenly the option to pay by cash so difficult when ALL the machines used to allow BOTH payment methods?

It’s pretty obvious to anyone with two brain cells to rub together that this is deliberate.

Of course it deliberate you donkey! Supermarkets are in the business of making money. As well as maximising profit they want to minimise cost.
The majority of people want to and can pay by card. IT is cheaper and easier for the supermarkets to minimise cash use. So they do that, obviously.
Why wouldn't they?

Honestly, people aren't getting the absolute basics of money and are making up paranoid nonsense to cover the huge gaps!

MaryMcCarthy · 10/01/2023 12:58

PlaitBilledDuckyPuss · 10/01/2023 12:52

You're fooling yourself; or rather allowing yourself to be fooled by marketing if you think a Revolut account can't be cloned or used by anyone else.

https://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/decision/DRN-3265894.pdf

Why have you posted an example where someone left their card in a taxi?

The exact same thing happens with cash, and it's a lot less traceable.

In your case study the guy got his money back. If he'd dropped cash, he wouldn't.

neverendinglauaundry · 10/01/2023 13:00

IDontCareMatthew · 10/01/2023 09:35

Well it's not going to change

Saves money to reduce cash use. So makes sense

Does it? Do you have a reference for this?

diddl · 10/01/2023 13:01

bringmetheheadofpastaalfredo · 10/01/2023 12:33

Why do you think cards don't work internationally?

I have 3 different cards, they all work almost anywhere. I've used my phone to pay in...I don't know, 15 countries at least?

Having had them declined when trying to pay.

StridTheKiller · 10/01/2023 13:06

@Mrsjayy Novotel hotels are cash free.
All the banks here have closed down.

Sartre · 10/01/2023 13:08

The world has been gradually moving towards this for years, you have to keep up or you’ll fall behind. I’ve used Apple Pay for about 7 years, almost never have cash and I personally hate cash only places for this reason. Find cash archaic, I don’t even own a purse.

Badbadbunny · 10/01/2023 13:08

ily0 · 10/01/2023 12:53

🤦‍♀️ You can’t be this stupid surely?! Why don’t they allow you to pay by cash OR card in the machines?! It’s not either or?! Every time I go to the supermarket there is a long queue to use the two machines that allow cash. Why is suddenly the option to pay by cash so difficult when ALL the machines used to allow BOTH payment methods?

It’s pretty obvious to anyone with two brain cells to rub together that this is deliberate.

Simples. Cash takes longer and more prone to needing a human to come and extract the creased note that it's eaten, further delay. Better to have a smaller number of machines taking cash so that customers using the quicker card payment option can get through the other machines quicker instead of being stuck behind a queue of slower cash payers. Just like the "10 items or less" queues.

Flameshame · 10/01/2023 13:09

I’m all for cards it’s much easier. However I was in a cashless shop and their machines went down. No-one could pay and we all had to leave. Made me worry about cyber attacks and what we’d do

Badbadbunny · 10/01/2023 13:10

ily0 · 10/01/2023 12:54

It’s obvious being ordered from the top down as a way of tracking people and their spending by making it as difficult as possible to pay by cash.

Words fail me, they really do.

gravyriceandchips · 10/01/2023 13:10

DiDonk · 10/01/2023 09:41

Get a second account at one of the internet only banks with a new card.

Send your weekly money to that account and only take that card with you.

We do this for budgeting and it works really well. Main account just hills and mortgage.

I do this too. It does work well for me.

Badbadbunny · 10/01/2023 13:13

Flameshame · 10/01/2023 13:09

I’m all for cards it’s much easier. However I was in a cashless shop and their machines went down. No-one could pay and we all had to leave. Made me worry about cyber attacks and what we’d do

Not being able to buy your shopping is the least of your worries if there really was a serious cyber attack. You may not get paid, you may lose access to your investments/pensions/savings. Your entire internet history could be wiped as could your bank accounts etc.

Cyber security is just about the biggest issue at the moment and is virtually a new industry in itself to protect against cyber attacks and minimise the damage should one happen, including back up systems, etc. Big firms are pumping billions into cyber security to minimise risks of it happening.

skyeisthelimit · 10/01/2023 13:14

@bringmetheheadofpastaalfredo

Of course I know that there are various options.

I said "these transactions can OFTEN cost". I did not say they always cost that. I see the purchase on my client's statement, they are not paying any charges, but the pub is. Obviously it is up to the pub to shop around and pay the minimum card price that they can, which is what I advise my clients to do, but various companies charge various prices and some businesses are limited to what they can use due to poor broadband and certain card readers not work (rural area
here).

Most of my own clients are not the type of business that takes card payments, but if they do then of course I advise them to shop around to get the best rates that they can.

At the end of the day, card use can mean that the business gets less per transaction than if somebody pays cash so they are making less money. However on the plus side, they could possibly sell more items as most people have cards but not always cash.

There are very good arguments for and against.

Your want to pay by card does not negate the fact that for some small businesses the charges cost them a lot of money.

TheRookie · 10/01/2023 13:16

Those saying that when a card system fails they have no way of selling.. this is the same anywhere though. If our computer system at work goes down, we can literally do nothing at all.

Recently Lloyds Pharmacy computer when down nationally so they were unable to do any prescriptions at all.

This isn't an excuse to not go cashless. I don't know anyone who has no other way of paying.

Swipe left for the next trending thread