Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think this charity deserve prosecution for being so bloody stupid?

298 replies

Fucklechuck · 02/01/2023 21:48

Just seen this in the news and went down a rabbit hole reading the whole story plus comments on their FB.

They took a bunch of young kids on a frozen lake (apparently without parental consent) and tried to justify it as a safety lesson despite clearly having no understanding themselves of the actual dangers. For example they're claiming the entire lake was frozen over with 2ft thick ice - no, it definitely wasn't, not in the south west of the UK, it's just not that cold in this country even in the recent cold snap. That's just impossible.

Their comments on their FB page are shockingly blasé and they've even been liking other people's comments saying that vaccines are a bigger danger to children than this was Hmm

Just can't believe anyone would be so stupid less than a week after the tragedy in Solihull Sad and then to take to social media calling it a knee jerk overreaction to suspend their license until an investigation is complete shows a total lack of regard for the most basic H&S or risk assessment processes. I actually hope their registration to look after children is revoked by whoever has such powers!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
ApplesNeverFall · 03/01/2023 01:20

I've just through all the comments on their Facebook page - wow! They certainly have formed a community of folk with interesting opinions. Lots of 'freeman of the land' types, along with the usual 'in my day' and 'can't do anything nowadays' plus the homeschoolers who are antivaccine and antiestablishment. Whoever is providing comments and responses from the charity is displaying woeful ignorance of not just the danger of walking on ice but also legal and safety considerations. I certainly have not gained a favourable impression of this organisation.

Whydidimarrythis · 03/01/2023 01:20

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Mumsnet can block your IP and broadband line through methods I’m not savvy enough to know. So, no, you won’t be returning on another account babe - otherwise ever banned user would 🙄

SeaToSki · 03/01/2023 01:20

The only way to tell how thick the ice was, would have been to chisel a hole in it and measure it. Did they do that? They should have physically checked the thickness at several points as one teacher walked out onto the ice (while wearing a floatation device) before anyone else went anywhere.

there is great advice on this link for anyone who is interested in safety around frozen lakes etc

survivalskills.guide/how-to-tell-if-ice-is-safe-to-walk-on/

hickorydickorydock89 · 03/01/2023 01:20

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

hickorydickorydock89 · 03/01/2023 01:21

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

JustAnotherManicNameChange · 03/01/2023 01:22

This thread just shows that safe ice is a myth,at least in the UK. There's no safe ice and people are ill equipped to judge or accurately determine the thickness and safety of it. So just don't bother. There's never any need to go across a frozen lake.

As for other countries, people are strongly encouraged to use them only in areas measured by professionals and accidents still happen.

Butchyrestingface · 03/01/2023 01:22

don't worry though i think they've already seen the comment i left for them on their facebook and news articles. Bad things happens to scummy people

You must be imminently due to be flattened by a bus then.

Whydidimarrythis · 03/01/2023 01:22

BradfordGirl · 03/01/2023 01:19

@Whydidimarrythis You posted someone saying the lake was 3 feet. This is a photo of police wading through the lake near the edge. It is obvious that it is deeper than 3 feet.

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/four-children-pulled-from-freezing-birmingham-lake-50v89h5h3

What makes you think they’re on their feet? They’d have been on their knees to keep their arms below the surface to search and keep their best balance. Good try though.

hickorydickorydock89 · 03/01/2023 01:23

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

SnowlayRoundabout · 03/01/2023 01:23

BradfordGirl · 03/01/2023 01:09

Babbs Mill was far deeper. And I said IF there was 2 feet of ice in a 3 feet lake then an 11 year old could not end up chest deep in water.

No, locals say Babbs Mill's maximum depth is 4 feet - which is confirmed by the fact that adult rescuers were wading in water that was waist deep for them.

We have established conclusively that there was not 2 feet of ice in the lake in question, and @Onnabugeisha has explained exactly how people fall under ice and get drowned when it cracks even in shallow water.

OldFan · 03/01/2023 01:23

Wow. I can't imagine they were physically prepared for the circumstances of anyone falling in.

Whydidimarrythis · 03/01/2023 01:23

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

You’re right, use a VPN and incognito and you’re in. Good job, you’ve successfully achieved the ability to be a dick anonymously on the internet - it’s a rare skill, we’re all super proud of you.

hickorydickorydock89 · 03/01/2023 01:24

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

ClareBlue · 03/01/2023 01:24

Don't feed the troll. Just let MNHQ deal with them

hickorydickorydock89 · 03/01/2023 01:25

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

AlanThePig · 03/01/2023 01:25

Our pond was solid for about two weeks. Out of curiosity I took a shovel to it to see how thick it was. The answer was barely 2”.

DdraigGoch · 03/01/2023 01:25

BradfordGirl · 03/01/2023 00:32

If the ice was as thick as they say, it is not going to crack. If it had cracked slightly you get some water coming onto the ice. No one is going to be chest high in icy water or have their head under water. These are 11 year olds.

And comparing this to powdery snow is insane. You obviously have never been taught how to walk safely in powdery snow.

The ice was almost certainly not as thick as they claim. The water meanwhile was at least as deep as the water that several children (some of them the same age) died in a week before.

hickorydickorydock89 · 03/01/2023 01:26

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Whydidimarrythis · 03/01/2023 01:26

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

You don’t come across as much of a “thinker” to me

hickorydickorydock89 · 03/01/2023 01:28

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

DdraigGoch · 03/01/2023 01:28

BradfordGirl · 03/01/2023 00:34

@Whydidimarrythis But everything is dangerous. They are talking about low risks. So walking on an icy path is dangerous, but no way should ordinary 11 year olds be stuck in the house when paths are icy. Everything is dangerous to some degree. It is managing that risk.

Yes, walking on icy paths is dangerous (as I learned when I forgot to pack my microspikes for a hiking trip last month). You manage the risk of falling through ice by not walking on frozen lakes. This isn't Norway, it's not cold enough for long enough here.

hickorydickorydock89 · 03/01/2023 01:31

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Butchyrestingface · 03/01/2023 01:32

ClareBlue · 03/01/2023 01:24

Don't feed the troll. Just let MNHQ deal with them

Yes, the #smalldickenergy is alive and well on this thread tonight.

hickorydickorydock89 · 03/01/2023 01:33

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

DdraigGoch · 03/01/2023 01:34

BradfordGirl · 03/01/2023 00:44

Not true. Once initial ice has formed following days do not even need to drop below zero for the ice to thicken further. So much depends on any water currents, depth of pond/lake and the wind.
Lots of you here are talking as if you know for a fact it could not be two inches thick but using ideas that are simply not true.

No one is saying that the ice couldn't have been two inches thick. In fact a local poster said that ice near them was five inches thick. The fact is that even five inches is barely thick enough to safely walk on.