Oh, Arabs were actively engaged with Hitler and Mussolini. Mein Kampf was translated to arabic and is still a point of a reference.
Gilbert Achcar writes much better than me
so I’ll directly quote him:
”In the first place, there is no such thing as Arabs. To speak in the singular of an Arab discourse is an aberration. The Arab world is driven by a multiplicity of points of view. At the time, one could single out four major ideological currents, which extend from western liberalism, through Marxism and nationalism, to Islamic fundamentalism. In regard to these four, two, namely western liberalism and Marxism, clearly rejected Nazism, in part on shared grounds (such as the heritage of enlightenment thinkers, and the denunciation of Nazism as a form of racism), and partially because of their geopolitical affiliations.
On this issue, Arab nationalism is contradictory. If one looks into it closely, however, the number of nationalistic groups which identified themselves with Nazi propaganda turns out to be quite scaled-down. There is only one clone of Nazism in the Arab world, namely the Syrian social national party, which was founded by a Lebanese Christian, Antoun Saadeh. The Young Egypt Party flirted for a time with Nazism, but it was a fickle, weathercock party. As to accusations that the Ba'ath party was, from the very outset in the 1940s, inspired by Nazism, they are completely false.”
I know that there were huge propaganda programs across the Arab world by Nazi Germany and Italy, relatives have spoken about it previously, and the Nazi party gained some support this way as they were led to believe that Hitler would help to end the colonial powers exercised by the French and British in Arab countries (a joint enemy), not because the Arab world had a hatred for Jews. Hitler thought very lowly of people across the Arab world because he believed they were racial inferior to him too.