On the “people of Kent” point, I am horrified that the government continues to let Kent take the strain with iirc no or little extra funding. This is the problem with closing legal routes - it increases boat crossings and leads to this unsustainable burden on Kent. There’s no reason that people in Kent should be put through this, having detention centres and overcrowded hotels in their doorstep. It’s an absolute failure of policy. It’s just that the current government has decided this is the way, and Braverman thinks you should just suck it up. When I campaign at the government I make it very clear that I’m doing it for asylum seekers and the communities who are bearing the brunt.
Case in point - current asylum claims in the year ending June 2022 = 63,000. (For comparison, the previous high was 60,000 in 2003.) Not all boat crossings, but enough to be putting a serious strain on communities in Kent. Asylum claim processing time has gone from 16 weeks to 2 years - that’s 2 years of hotels and hostels taken up and the expense involved, The time hasn’t increased just because of the number of asylum seekers, but because of Home Office inefficiency and staffing cuts.
Ukrainian visas processed = 140,000 and done with nowhere near the strain on any one particular area. They’re more evenly spread around the country.
There are also massive faults with that scheme but I find the difference in the numbers and placement astounding. Even allowing for some on the Ukrainian visas being family groups therefore living together*, it shows the difference between the impact on communities of a safe route and the impact on communities of continued boat crossings.
*safe routes allow for families to come together. Those in boats tend to be young men as women and children physically cannot make the journey and there’s a high risk of sexual assault and trafficking on the way.