Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Rishi is PM - coronation, unelected -GE Now

1000 replies

MrsRobinsonsHandprints · 24/10/2022 14:06

This is not democracy.

OP posts:
UnCivil · 24/10/2022 18:35

Bluebellbike · 24/10/2022 16:23

But "any old Joe" hasn't voted for our new Conservative party leader. Nobody voted as there was only one candidate. He was elected by default.

He was selected on the basis that he was the only candidate to reach the pre determined level of support. Every conservative MP knew the criteria and those that had the guts to pin their name to a candidate favoured Sunak.

Stars71 · 24/10/2022 18:35

etopp · 24/10/2022 18:33

Yes it was. My entire sector was wiped out overnight and has still not recovered properly yet.

So you're bitter towards everyone, who didn't go under, and who received furlough?

LakieLady · 24/10/2022 18:36

Namechangeforthis88 · 24/10/2022 14:19

On the plus side, DFIL is going into orbit over this.

😁

I'm intrigued to learn how my racist Tory-voting SIL and her husband will be voting in the next GE.

IstillloveU · 24/10/2022 18:36

TurquoiseDress · 24/10/2022 17:13

Am sure I'll be swiftly corrected about the not paying tax thing, it's perfectly legal

Well I'm sure it's probably a loophole, conveniently approved by those in power!

It's designed to get foreign investment by multinationals who then employ people here. It's the equivalent of Ireland's low corporate tax (just in a different format).

AdoraBell · 24/10/2022 18:38

My job was effected too, the US company that owns the business took the opportunity to close 70 odd stores. Without the furlough programme they would have had to come up with a good reason.

That wasn’t the fault of the furlough programme, they just used it their advantage.

blackpearwhitelilies · 24/10/2022 18:38

Kissingfrogs25 · 24/10/2022 18:30

Self preservation? By installing Sunak - how many red wallers or blue wallers will vote for a billionaire banker do you suppose? How many of Johnson 18M voters are going to vote for the guy that stabbed Johnson in the back and plunged the party into chaos? Do you actually think Sunak stands ANY chance whatsoever winning a GE? Especially after the cuts he is planning and implementing as we speak. It is for the birds.

Most people think it is a stitch up - and they are not wrong.

When did Johnson ever have 18 million voters? 13.2 people voted Tory in 2019, if those are the people you mean.

AnyFucker · 24/10/2022 18:40

While he's at it, he could re-divert funds fraudulently claimed to all of those who fell between all the gaps and who had fuck all money coming in for over a year

and that

etopp · 24/10/2022 18:40

Stars71 · 24/10/2022 18:35

So you're bitter towards everyone, who didn't go under, and who received furlough?

Actually, no. My issue isn't in fact with people who were furloughed (despite my snarky comments about banana bread). But I am very, very bitter towards the politicians who came up with the lockdown policy.

Kissingfrogs25 · 24/10/2022 18:40

UnCivil · 24/10/2022 18:35

He was selected on the basis that he was the only candidate to reach the pre determined level of support. Every conservative MP knew the criteria and those that had the guts to pin their name to a candidate favoured Sunak.

uncivil and you know as well as I do that the bar was set so unnaturally high, as to ensure there was a coronation of the man chosen by the suits.

In any leadership contest in the past it has never been anything like a 100 backers required or anything like it. The word is many MPs were indeed threatened aggressively over the weekend.
We will one day know the truth, but one thing is very clear that Sunak has no mandate to run the country, he doesn't even have the mandate from his own party members.

I do not expect him to last very long at all, the sharks will be circling and no one is going to forget or forgive his terrible treacherous behaviour or what has happened as a consequence. The party is about to descend into open civil war and good luck to Sunak, my god he is going to need it.

IstillloveU · 24/10/2022 18:41

MissyB1 · 24/10/2022 17:26

hang on a minute what Consultants are getting 300k?? I need to tell Dh he’s only being paid a third of what he should be!!

I'd double check his accounts there Madam.

AlderAppleAsh · 24/10/2022 18:41

@Quirkyme im sorry, I didn’t mean to come across in any offensive way. I know racism exists.

It just genuinely didn’t occur to me he wasn’t white, as in I hadn’t put any thought into it, until I read that post. I just registered him as Sunak. Not Sunak the Asian. As far as I’m concerned, as long as he gets the job done, I could care less about his race, religion, background, whatever else.
(I really hope that makes sense and hasn’t come across offensive)

Anyways. I’m going to shut up. I know what I’m trying to say but doing an awful at it. I know there will always be people in the world who are just racists w and no matter how much people try to tell them otherwise they will still be the same.

sst1234 · 24/10/2022 18:42

AnApparitionQuipped · 24/10/2022 18:33

I repeat - only 4% of potentially eligible workers were furloughed. The vast majority worked through the lockdown period I worked throughout myself, but I don't resent people who were furloughed - if their business was closed, what choice did they have?

This post is an example of incorrect information and spectacularly missing the point - all in one go.

11.7 million workers were furloughed, that’s a tad higher than 4%. More like a quarter.

Stop perpetuating the false dichotomy that the choice was between furlough or letting people starve. The choice was between locking down everyone and only locking down the elderly. A bad choice was made that cost this economy half a trillion pounds in the short term and much more in the long term.

Tabbouleh · 24/10/2022 18:42

You didn't know Sunak was not white? Huh.

mumda · 24/10/2022 18:44

Will we have another eat out to help out?

Suemademedoit · 24/10/2022 18:44

ChaosThunder · 24/10/2022 17:09

She was registered as a non domicile, which is a perfectly legal registration process. Nondom status allows you to choose taxation basis - you can choose to be taxed in the UK on worldwide income and claim double taxation relief in the other country where you earned the income. Or you can choose remittance basis ie pay taxes in the other country where the income is earned and pay UK tax on any money she brings into the UK to the extent that the UK tax rate is higher than the other country.
In her case, she earns her income primarily as dividend in India fromher shareholding in her father's company and is required to file returns and pay taxes in India at Indian rates. Let's say, dividend is taxed at say 10% in India and 20% in the UK to keep it simple. If she earns 10million in dividend, She pays 10% tax in India. And if she brings in 1million into the UK, she paid the extra 10% (20% uk rate minus 10% India rate) to HMRC. This is the remittance basis she was doing earlier- perfectly legal.

Now she has volunteered to switch to the method where she declares worldwide income in UK and gets double taxation relief for taxes paid in India.

So, in effect, what she has done is 100% legal. Tax avoidance ie using legal means to reduce taxation is perfectly valid. Tax evasion ie hiding income or conflating expenses to reduce taxes is illegal.

Why would she pay any more tax than she absolutely had to? Which millionaire does? Its only because of the optics that she's changed her nondom tax method.

The rules are written by the MPs for their cronies. People should be critical of such loopholes, not that people are using the loopholes because they can.

And, to top it off, these laws were introduced to benefit all the English, Scottish and Welsh working, middle and upper class men (and it was men, which is why domiciliary status is inherited via your father only - their female counterparts were largely disregarded) who made their fortunes in India in the 1800s under the East India Company and, once it was nationalised, the Raj. These men went overseas to make their fortunes and resented having to pay tax to the British government when they didn't live in the country, despite being British citizens. Their "permanent homes" were in India, apparently. They wanted to make their money in India, where they paid no taxes, and not owe the British government anything on the basis they didn't live there. A concession was granted to them because the EIC was, to our modern minds, inconceivably powerful and rooted in Parliament.

AlderAppleAsh · 24/10/2022 18:46

Tabbouleh · 24/10/2022 18:42

You didn't know Sunak was not white? Huh.

Obviously I knew he wasn’t white.

My point was, It didn’t occur to me to just think of him as Sunak the Asian. I just thought of him as Sunak. I’m appalled at why people are hating and judging him on his race rather than his actions.

IstillloveU · 24/10/2022 18:46

sst1234 · 24/10/2022 17:43

You are really trying hard to push the false dichotomy but it’s not working. The elderly should have been locked down, shielded, quarantined, call it what you will. Healthy workers keeping the economy running as normal.

‘Don’t kill granny’ argument was as pathetic then as it is now. It wasn’t a choice between killing granny or killing the economy. It was a an obsession with restrictions by people who liked being babied and the government spending big. The austerity coming down the road, to pay for lockdowns, will kill far more grannies. Let that sink in.

I agree @sst1234

Croque · 24/10/2022 18:47

I wanted to see the reactions of party members in on-the-spot interviews and I haven't been disappointed! 😅
I think the test of his longevity will be how he reacts to the energy crisis given the comments he made during the hustings during the summer..

Holidayexpert · 24/10/2022 18:48

@Stars71 you’re hilarious! I thought you were serious. You had me going for a bit😀

EmmaH2022 · 24/10/2022 18:48

AlderAppleAsh · 24/10/2022 18:41

@Quirkyme im sorry, I didn’t mean to come across in any offensive way. I know racism exists.

It just genuinely didn’t occur to me he wasn’t white, as in I hadn’t put any thought into it, until I read that post. I just registered him as Sunak. Not Sunak the Asian. As far as I’m concerned, as long as he gets the job done, I could care less about his race, religion, background, whatever else.
(I really hope that makes sense and hasn’t come across offensive)

Anyways. I’m going to shut up. I know what I’m trying to say but doing an awful at it. I know there will always be people in the world who are just racists w and no matter how much people try to tell them otherwise they will still be the same.

I totally get it, in my day <waves stick> this was normal. I am not white. Mixed so not easy to label which leads to sooo many questions.

I do remember huffing that I didn't vote when Blair and Brown did their thing but as I say - in this case, there's no competition so what did members want?

and if Truss is such a disaster for the Tories then why do they want another vote if they feel a terrible mistake was made? So confusing.

MarshaBradyo · 24/10/2022 18:48

sst1234 · 24/10/2022 18:42

This post is an example of incorrect information and spectacularly missing the point - all in one go.

11.7 million workers were furloughed, that’s a tad higher than 4%. More like a quarter.

Stop perpetuating the false dichotomy that the choice was between furlough or letting people starve. The choice was between locking down everyone and only locking down the elderly. A bad choice was made that cost this economy half a trillion pounds in the short term and much more in the long term.

Yes 4% seems very out

VivX · 24/10/2022 18:48

Not a Conservative voter but I do think he was their best option. With that said, given that their previous "best" was Johnson and Truss, the bar was not exactly high.

Also, he is British and the PM doesn't need to be "English" (although wasn't he born in Southampton - which surely makes him... English?)

His wife's tax affairs are what Conservative voters voted for. If you don't like people being able to do what she has done with regards to her tax affairs, then don't vote Conservative.

It is weird to vote for a party that allows that much legal tax avoidance and then complain about it when someone does it.

Croque · 24/10/2022 18:49

I am actually quite glad to see an Asian guy leading the Tories. It really shakes things up. Labour has benefitted from votes from BAME communities when they haven't always deserved them. Welcome Rishi.

Quirkyme · 24/10/2022 18:49

VivX · 24/10/2022 18:48

Not a Conservative voter but I do think he was their best option. With that said, given that their previous "best" was Johnson and Truss, the bar was not exactly high.

Also, he is British and the PM doesn't need to be "English" (although wasn't he born in Southampton - which surely makes him... English?)

His wife's tax affairs are what Conservative voters voted for. If you don't like people being able to do what she has done with regards to her tax affairs, then don't vote Conservative.

It is weird to vote for a party that allows that much legal tax avoidance and then complain about it when someone does it.

AGREE.

IstillloveU · 24/10/2022 18:50

mathanxiety · 24/10/2022 17:47

The average age of death for COVID was 83 , higher than the average life expectancy in total . We fucked up the entire economy for that.

The economy was already in the pan thanks to Brexit. Covid only meant that the unleashing of the free market ideology that the markets responded so badly to got delayed.

@mathanxiety
I'm a little perplexed as to your interest in British politics given that with you proudly hold onto your Mumsnet royalty username, so I happen to know that you're Irish and live in the US. 🤔

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread