Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask what people have against Labour?

454 replies

TheSmallestOneWasMadeline · 01/10/2022 12:21

I have come across lots of people who, even while admitting that the Conservatives are far from ideal, seem to scrunch their nose up and say 'but, ew, Labour' when talking about politics.

I have to admit I dont understand what it is that people think is so terrible about them and nobody ever cares to elaborate! I always vote for them as I think their principles align pretty closely with my own even if I don't agree with absolutely e everything they stand for.

Could someone please explain what people think is so terrible about them that they would do a worse job at running the country than the Conservatives have done?

OP posts:
BirmaBrite · 02/10/2022 08:05

@BogRollBOGOF An Amnesty International report found that Abbott was the subject of almost half of all abusive tweets about female MPs on Twitter during the 2017 election campaign, receiving ten times more abuse than any other MP.

BirmaBrite · 02/10/2022 08:17

as opposed to admitting that EU skepticism has always been a common Labour/working class position for solid reasons around the economic interests of w/c people.

Lets see how things pan out for working class people, economically, now we are out of the EU, and still under the Conservatives. Will trickle down economics really benefit them ? Will Britannia unchained benefit them ?

nuttynotty · 02/10/2022 08:48

@Florenz

"The children should be taken into care if their parents are homeless. And yes, the parents should be evicted if they don't pay the rent. Just like childless people are."

Putting aside the morality and humanity of that (as you obviously are not capable of those things), putting those children into care would cost a lot more than supporting the parents by paying their rent.

BirmaBrite · 02/10/2022 09:19

Just watched Liz Truss being interviewed, one thing that struck me is the way she mentions the fuel payments as though they were her governments idea, I thought it was Rishi Sunak who came up with the plan back in May ?

User135644 · 02/10/2022 09:21

Florenz · 01/10/2022 21:18

I remember John Smith's death being announced at the Tory party conference in 1994. There was an audible gasp from the audience, people were clearly saddened and shocked. I have no doubt whatsoever that if there had been a Labour conference going on when Margaret Thatcher died, the announcement of her death would have sparked raucous cheering and celebrations among the attendees.

Thatcher's policies destroyed the lives of millions of people.

Smith never held office.

walkingonsunshinekat · 02/10/2022 09:24

BirmaBrite · 02/10/2022 09:19

Just watched Liz Truss being interviewed, one thing that struck me is the way she mentions the fuel payments as though they were her governments idea, I thought it was Rishi Sunak who came up with the plan back in May ?

Very much against the tories plan, billions of tax payers money current and future spent to subsidise the bills of the very wealthy, with tax take on the companies who are making 100s of billions in unexpected profit.

Plus what happens in 18 months time when the money runs out and Putins gas embargo is still in place?

MarshaBradyo · 02/10/2022 09:32

BirmaBrite · 02/10/2022 09:19

Just watched Liz Truss being interviewed, one thing that struck me is the way she mentions the fuel payments as though they were her governments idea, I thought it was Rishi Sunak who came up with the plan back in May ?

He did cash payments but I did think there was an energy statement from Truss around the cap in early September

One thing I’m not sure about is whether MPs vote on mini budget

walkingonsunshinekat · 02/10/2022 09:36

It was the LibDems that first came up with a 6 month energy cap.

Dismissed as totally unworkable by Sunak etc, then Labour suggested it.

the Tories were too tied up with their leadership election and BJ said he wouldn't announce any large policy stuff.

BeardieWeirdie · 02/10/2022 09:40

Labour doesn’t know what a woman is. Respect my sex if you want my X.

Newrumpus · 02/10/2022 09:49

From Labour’s point of view, there is a real danger that they think they have already won. They may still underestimate the damage they have done to their own vote.

Ticksallboxes · 02/10/2022 09:55

For a lot of people I think it's that Labour ministers just don't have the cast iron confidence that most Conservative ministers have, and people equate that with strong leadership.

But that confidence usually just comes from having a ridiculously privileged upbringing and public school education.

MarshaBradyo · 02/10/2022 09:58

Someone I do rate not just due to status of background but experience is Ben Wallace

I don’t know who takes that position in the opposition but I appreciate Wallace more given war situation

itsgettingweird · 02/10/2022 10:01

MarshaBradyo · 02/10/2022 09:58

Someone I do rate not just due to status of background but experience is Ben Wallace

I don’t know who takes that position in the opposition but I appreciate Wallace more given war situation

I have the utmost respect for Wallace for not continuing his leadership bid because the war in Ukraine was going on and focussing on that.

He really was morals before career. Not many Tory's can claim that!

Hoppinggreen · 02/10/2022 10:10

MarshaBradyo · 02/10/2022 09:58

Someone I do rate not just due to status of background but experience is Ben Wallace

I don’t know who takes that position in the opposition but I appreciate Wallace more given war situation

Wallace, Stewart, Hunt
Any Tory who shows even the slightest bit of decency is dealt with swiftly and harshly.
The Tories have never much liked anyone who wasn’t very rich but they don’t even pretend any more

pattihews · 02/10/2022 10:25

BirmaBrite · 02/10/2022 08:17

as opposed to admitting that EU skepticism has always been a common Labour/working class position for solid reasons around the economic interests of w/c people.

Lets see how things pan out for working class people, economically, now we are out of the EU, and still under the Conservatives. Will trickle down economics really benefit them ? Will Britannia unchained benefit them ?

Trickle-down doesn't work. Watch this programme where even the fat-cats seem stunned at how much money they've made and admit they're just hoarding and growing the wealth and it's not trickling down. It's a BBC series called The Decade the Rich Won:

www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episodes/m0013xch/the-decade-the-rich-won

Dammitthisisshit · 02/10/2022 10:30

Labour doesn’t know what a woman is. Respect my sex if you want my X.

^^ this.

I’ve voted Labour in the past more than any other party, was even a member in the distant past. But I can’t vote for the erasure of women.

walkingonsunshinekat · 02/10/2022 10:37

itsgettingweird · 02/10/2022 10:01

I have the utmost respect for Wallace for not continuing his leadership bid because the war in Ukraine was going on and focussing on that.

He really was morals before career. Not many Tory's can claim that!

I thought it was because he didn't have the required number of MPs to back him? same as Patel.

He would have had no idea who would win, so therefore could not be sure he would be kept on.

ChagSameachDoreen · 02/10/2022 10:39

The head of the workers' party is a Sir. That's enough to put me off.

Plus all the trans nonsense.

VickyEadieofThigh · 02/10/2022 10:40

InsertPunHere · 01/10/2022 16:33

For me it's the way they have thrown women to the wolves in order to pander to the demands of TRA.

That's most of it for me.

VickyEadieofThigh · 02/10/2022 10:41

ChagSameachDoreen · 02/10/2022 10:39

The head of the workers' party is a Sir. That's enough to put me off.

Plus all the trans nonsense.

Far be it from me to defend Labour (given the trans nonsense) but have you looked at Starmer's background and the reason he is a sir?

FitAt50 · 02/10/2022 10:59

VickyEadieofThigh · 02/10/2022 10:41

Far be it from me to defend Labour (given the trans nonsense) but have you looked at Starmer's background and the reason he is a sir?

You are expecting people to vote based on facts, or having done any kind of basic reading, this is Britain, thats not how we do things here😛

Lidlcustardtart · 02/10/2022 11:04

FFS Keir starmer was given a title for his work as DPP. His background is pretty humble. I guess he accepted it because he's a pretty centrist politician - pro business, pro monarchy.

InsertPunHere · 02/10/2022 11:08

While Labour has dickheads like Alex Sobel actively telling GC women he doesn't want their vote, and while Karen Ingala Smith, the force behind the Counting Dead Women project, is denied Labour membership because of wrongthink, Labour is no place for feminists.

I have been a Labour supporter for most of my life. I can't do it in good conscience at the moment.

DuckBilledFattypus · 02/10/2022 11:18

Labour has been completely destroyed from the inside by those who wanted Corbyn out and a more Blair type new labour government, rather than the labour of old. I guess Starmer is far closer to the Blair model of labour. The party is now full of people with completely competing interests. And it's corrupt as a result of that. It's really sad.

BaileySharp · 02/10/2022 11:19

I dont lime their self ID policy, but I'm not one of those "ew Labour" types and usually end up voting for them (I have a strong dislike of the tories, they have proved themselves more financially irresponsible and they just want to make rich people richer and don't care about average people like me, they also underinvest in public services which is why the nhs is on its knees)

Swipe left for the next trending thread