Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask what people have against Labour?

454 replies

TheSmallestOneWasMadeline · 01/10/2022 12:21

I have come across lots of people who, even while admitting that the Conservatives are far from ideal, seem to scrunch their nose up and say 'but, ew, Labour' when talking about politics.

I have to admit I dont understand what it is that people think is so terrible about them and nobody ever cares to elaborate! I always vote for them as I think their principles align pretty closely with my own even if I don't agree with absolutely e everything they stand for.

Could someone please explain what people think is so terrible about them that they would do a worse job at running the country than the Conservatives have done?

OP posts:
TinyLittleBug · 01/10/2022 23:08

I don’t like that they’ve never had a female leader. Choosing Starmer over Jess Phillips for leadership was baffling to me. I won’t vote Tory but I struggle with voting Labour, and will probably just keep voting for the Green Party.

Windowboxgardener · 01/10/2022 23:10

Lidlcustardtart · 01/10/2022 21:53

@TwoSheetstothewind56 so it's objectionable for labour supporters to say 'tory scum' but totally fine for you to call them 'the class hatred gang?'

Incidentally upthread labour are accused of being middle class elites so...??

I think you meant me.

Do I think many people in the Labour movement are motivated by class/race/sex hatred: yes. The fact that they label millions of people “scum” just because of the way they voted maybe suggests they aren’t terribly discriminating or rational in their views.

Do I call people (either behind their backs or to their faces) “Scum”, no I do not. That would be descending to their level.

Mamai90 · 01/10/2022 23:11

Florenz · 01/10/2022 16:18

A lot of people on the "left" are absolutely toxic and very unpleasant. Some of that rubs off on the Labour party. Perhaps unfairly but they really should do more to distance themselves from the extremists.

I feel similarly about right wingers.

Pilipalapal · 01/10/2022 23:19

entropynow · 01/10/2022 22:48

Gosh. A* Missing the Point with bonus Neatly Illustrating My Other Comment there.
Whataboutery won't cut it mate.

I have no idea what you’re even trying to say. I’m sure you’re making coherent points in your head.

TheRubyRedshoes · 01/10/2022 23:23

I've not seen the types of agressive posts from so called Tory's or swing voters as I do from extremely left wing voters.

Mate shit show.....

Hugocat1 · 01/10/2022 23:24

Mamai90 · 01/10/2022 23:11

I feel similarly about right wingers.

Ah right wingers … does that mean ‘far’ right as I’ve been called that recently because …

I believe in biological sex
Despite being working class I own my own business.
Mr kids go to private school
I own my own house.

if that makes me right wing ( despite being told by Labour they don’t want my vote)

I’ll vote Tory.

TheRubyRedshoes · 01/10/2022 23:26

Window agree.

See such extreme hatred.

It worries me that after the Corbyn love in that such extreme people would get close to power..

I think starmer has done a good/reasonable job in beating them back but they are still there.

No one in their right minds would vote Tory mate If the Bnp were fist in glove with the Tories.

Pilipalapal · 01/10/2022 23:29

“A lot of people on the left are unpleasant”
”So are some people on the right”
”Gasp! How dare you!”

Whattaweapon · 01/10/2022 23:47

If a Labour PM ordered the monarch to stay away from the COP summit there would be uproar. The Queen gave a speech to the last one so it's hardly outlandish.

Why the hell is she making an issue of this? So hypocritical considering the UK hosted the last one!

Fishandchipsupper · 01/10/2022 23:49

They are full on TWAW, they won’t listen to women and are trying to silence Gender Critical Labour MPs and members. If they respond at all it is to say they will sort it out later as there are much more important things to worry about, for example the economy.
BUT this is the time to sort things out. Currently the labour leaders are not in Government, they actually do have time to address the mysogyny and TRAs in the party. Once in power they won’t have time to deal with womens issues within the party as they will be dealing with the economy and government rather than being onlookers.

DirectionToPerfection · 01/10/2022 23:51

Pilipalapal · 01/10/2022 23:29

“A lot of people on the left are unpleasant”
”So are some people on the right”
”Gasp! How dare you!”

😂

Another poster called Labour 'uncouth'. I'd much rather that than a polite veneer with utter ruthlessness underneath.

SwordToFlamethrower · 02/10/2022 00:01

When you ask them what women is and they reply "anyone who identifies as one". Or the leader of the party says "it is unreasonable to say only women have a cervix."
And you know that if they get in, all your hard won rights are going in the bin.

Sarasandman · 02/10/2022 00:07

Florenz · 01/10/2022 16:53

In general, Labour would do a lot better if they concentrated on working people, making sure people were able to earn a respectable living through working instead of relying on benefits. It's the Labour party, Labour means work.

That's why Labour introduced the minimum wage, work schemes and limits on benefits when they were last in government.

pattihews · 02/10/2022 00:08

Aside from the obvious surreal situations where senior Labour politicians insist people can change sex, or that Russia is misunderstood and the war in Ukraine is all the West’s fault, a more mundane example of detachment from reality is that Labour did not have - still doesn’t - a workable migration/borders policy. Shouting “Priti Patel is evil” is not actually a policy. It is fine to say we should relax asylum rules and processes and establish safe routes to entry - but you also need to have a view on how many asylum seekers and economic migrants a year you think would be too many for the UK to absorb, and what you would do to keep us below those numbers. But obvs Labour won’t do that because it would involve acknowledgement that this stuff is hard and sometimes as a Government you are going to have to make tough decisions.

Thank you for this, Windowboxgardener. I really, really, get what you mean about Labour being unable to make hard decisions. That was certainly what people on the doorstep picked up on during the Corbyn years — that Labour was just throwing money around but not addressing any of the really difficult questions. I volunteered to work with asylum seekers back in 2009, all optimistic and green. I emerged a couple of years later feeling very differently. It's complicated and difficult and when you've positioned yourself as the peoples' saviour party it can be difficult to face hard facts. And that's another reason why Truss may well surprise people at the next GE. If the country is in its knees financially people may question the 'nice' party wanting to let everyone in.

TheScorpionandtheFrog · 02/10/2022 00:11

Labour think identity politics are more important than getting the Tories out and so I can no longer vote for them in good conscience.

All 3 main political parties - Libdems, Tories and Labour support self ID; and this is already affecting women in places like changing rooms, prisons, DV shelters, psychiatric units and hospitals. Its destroying women's sports.

The Geneva convention states that where prison camps are mixed sex, separate dormitories should be provided for men and women.
How can something that's a war crime legally be inflicted on us? No one who supports human rights or calls themselves a Socialist should support removing the right to safeguarding of half the population.

walkersareback · 02/10/2022 01:41

Florenz · 01/10/2022 21:18

I remember John Smith's death being announced at the Tory party conference in 1994. There was an audible gasp from the audience, people were clearly saddened and shocked. I have no doubt whatsoever that if there had been a Labour conference going on when Margaret Thatcher died, the announcement of her death would have sparked raucous cheering and celebrations among the attendees.

That was the Tory party of 1994 - have you seen how rude, dismissive sneering the current lot on prime ministers questions, or Shen asked questions by journalists?

walkersareback · 02/10/2022 01:45

DuckBilledFattypus · 01/10/2022 18:46

So both parties are in thrall to the TWAW brigade ? Especially the one in power who has allowed men into womens prisons etc

It's bad enough as it is. I don't want it to get even worse thanks.

You think it's not going to get worse under conservatives? Just watch and see - they don't care! They just avoid the subject.

NicolaSixSix · 02/10/2022 01:47

Carlycat · 01/10/2022 16:50

Their decimation of women rights makes them completely unelectable for me

They
have
not
been
in
power
for
TWELVE YEARS

how has Labour decimated women’s rights??

walkersareback · 02/10/2022 01:48

hattie43 · 01/10/2022 19:32

They are the nasty party masquerading as being on the side of the people .

Racists towards Jewish people
Miriam Margolyes wishing Boris Johnson dead
Angela Raynor Tory Scum
Jeez even BAME on BAME last week
Jeremy Corbin complete nutter

No matter how much you disagree with someone's politics these personal attacks are horrible .They are unelectable.

Like the personal UNTRUE attacks Boris Johnson made on Kier Starmer about Jimmy Saville?

NicolaSixSix · 02/10/2022 01:48

@Carlycat see above

Handsoffmyrights · 02/10/2022 01:50

They hate women.

But Eddie Izzard looks fabulous in that new dress, apparently.

NicolaSixSix · 02/10/2022 01:55

pattihews · 02/10/2022 00:08

Aside from the obvious surreal situations where senior Labour politicians insist people can change sex, or that Russia is misunderstood and the war in Ukraine is all the West’s fault, a more mundane example of detachment from reality is that Labour did not have - still doesn’t - a workable migration/borders policy. Shouting “Priti Patel is evil” is not actually a policy. It is fine to say we should relax asylum rules and processes and establish safe routes to entry - but you also need to have a view on how many asylum seekers and economic migrants a year you think would be too many for the UK to absorb, and what you would do to keep us below those numbers. But obvs Labour won’t do that because it would involve acknowledgement that this stuff is hard and sometimes as a Government you are going to have to make tough decisions.

Thank you for this, Windowboxgardener. I really, really, get what you mean about Labour being unable to make hard decisions. That was certainly what people on the doorstep picked up on during the Corbyn years — that Labour was just throwing money around but not addressing any of the really difficult questions. I volunteered to work with asylum seekers back in 2009, all optimistic and green. I emerged a couple of years later feeling very differently. It's complicated and difficult and when you've positioned yourself as the peoples' saviour party it can be difficult to face hard facts. And that's another reason why Truss may well surprise people at the next GE. If the country is in its knees financially people may question the 'nice' party wanting to let everyone in.

@pattihews what were your experiences like, volunteering to support asylum seekers?

walkersareback · 02/10/2022 01:57

TwoSheetstothewind56 · 01/10/2022 20:58

Also.

Tory voters when Labour’s done wrong.
“How dare they, terrible Labour!”

Tory voters when the Tory’s have done wrong
”All these parties are as bad as each other”

This absolutely

walkersareback · 02/10/2022 02:00

waffless · 01/10/2022 21:09

One big difference that you will see if the Labour Party get in. Conservatives will not be insulting them in SM like Labour voters do. It is so off putting. I for example never hear conservatives making such vitriolic comments about the worse Mayor London ever had. Sadiq Khan gets a free pass for from Labour and this is proof of their hypocrisy.

Do you look at SM? Sadiq Jhan gets an unbelievable amount of shit from Tories, as does Angela Rayner, Jess Phillips and David Lammy to name a few.

MangyInseam · 02/10/2022 02:33

pattihews · 01/10/2022 20:49

But Labour is committed to renationalising some privatised industries. That's not something a bourgeois party would do. The bourgeoisie make and keep money for themselves. They are the fat-cat bankers, the city brokers, the captains of industry, the people who own land and whatever's on it. They are what the Labour Party despises.

Labour is committed to global capitalism. They have no intention of making things hard for bankers. They like to feel good about doing it, which is why they are so desperate to convince themselves that working class people vote against their own interests and wanted Brexit because they were racists, as opposed to admitting that EU skepticism has always been a common Labour/working class position for solid reasons around the economic interests of w/c people.

The need to feel morally justified in that way is also very typical of that social class.

Swipe left for the next trending thread