Thanks for replying.
First off, the mandates were broadly the same as those in the majority of countries, including the UK. During the peak of Covid, you needed proof of vaccination to enter the country.
This affected a small proportion of truckers, whose routes crossed the US border (the US also required proof of vaccination btw, so this wasn’t even a matter within Canada’s control).
Most unvaccinated truckers were reassigned by their employers to internal routes, but a small number could not be reassigned, and others refused.
As to the protest itself - it would not have been allowed in the UK or most other countries. Canadians have less restrictions on the right to protest that Brits do.
In the UK, when Extinction Rebellion, Insulate Britain or whoever else try similar protests, they are cleared out by police on the same day.
The ‘Freedom Convoy’ occupied a large section of Canada’s capital, and disrupted the import and export of food and other goods into the country, for a whole month.
And they weren’t simply blocking roads in Ottawa, but causing a deliberate and active nuisance to residents, by blaring their horns 24 hours per day. Various residents (including vulnerable people) were all but trapped in their homes for weeks.
Elements of the convoy were also stockpiling guns and large quantities of ammunition.
Freezing the bank accounts of those associated with and funding the convoy was very much a last-resort and the only realistic alternative was sending in the army, and the violence that comes with that.
Ask yourself this, do you really, honestly think that if 1,000s of climate protestors occupied the City of London and blocked the channel tunnel, harassed residents for 24 hours per day, for a whole month, shutting down businesses, whilst being largely funded by donations from EU countries and stockpiling guns and ammunition, what do you think the UK would have done about it?