I know some people hold him personally responsible for brexit but I have never subscribed to that view.
It’s not a “view” that needs subscribing to - it’s factual.
He was the Leader of the Opposition in 2010 who argued for a referendum and made it a manifesto promise.
He again in 2015 drove through the promise of renegotiated terms followed by a referendum
How, as Leader in two successive election windows, can he not be held responsible? Who is responsible then?
It was a pressing question that needed answering.
so why wasn’t it answered under Thatcher, Major? The Tory party was always held together uneasily by the fact that Europe was one they all disagreed on, but had to stay together on for the sake of party unity.
Cameron blew that apart for one simple reason - a real fear of UKIP ( electorally unfounded as it happens) sapping and drawing away the votes of his party.
he had the arrogance to think he could end the debate and unify his party through “resubmitting” the status quo. He never thought he could lose.
I do think he should have done more to show the benefits of being in the EU.
can you think of a benefit more powerful than “change?” If you’re the status quo and you’re arguing for it, then your argument needs to be substantively better than “change” which always has an allure far beyond anything else
with the greatest respects @Yellowredandbrown i don’t think you’re completely well versed on Cameron, Brexit or any of this.