I don't see why it's so important for numbers to keep going up and up and up. It confuses customers and it reaches a point where it's just a bit silly
The only thing confusing is that sizing means nothing now.
If someone asked you your size would they be able to go into any store and buy that size and it would fit or would it depend on the store or even the style in the same store.
If we did reach a point where normal weight and underweight people are as badly served as overweight people used to be, my guess is that there would be an increase in specialist clothing for slim and thin people
Its now called the children section.
The biggest issue I see and no one can explain it is this
In the children’s section of stores the clothing is based on height and age so 14+ in age would have longer tops, trousers, dresses etc than the 12-14 age group etc
Dd aged in her 20s with long legs buys her clothes in the children’s section (a lot of her friends do as well because the adult section just doesn’t fit them any more.certain designers do the same clothing in the adult and children’s section. The children’s section is at least 20% cheaper (no vat) -50% cheaper just because it is in the children’s section.)
What we find strange in stores is that the trouser length in the children’s section are made with the leg length longer than the adult section.
When you see a pair of trousers in the adults section and you think it has a longer leg when you get it off the rail and take a closer look at it, the actual leg length is still the same as every other size (maybe 1” more if you are lucky) but the length from waist band to crotch is where the extra length is.
Saying you have a crotch to heel measurement of 36” will get you a pair of trousers with a leg length of 30” and a waist to crotch measurement 6” longer. Ever tried walking with trousers where the crotch is somewhere near your knees. Or if you pull them up your calf’s are exposed and the waistband is just under your arm pits.
Yet age 12-14 or 14+ has the correct longer length leg
I can only assume that clothing manufacturers assume that as soon as children with long legs hit the adult clothing market their legs get shorter because their bums have dropped 6” because that is the only explanation.
My daughter has worked as a model for sizing for a couple of clothing companies. They advertised they want the 32” 22” 34”woman. When she has got there and tried on a lot of clothes she could tell that they wanted a bigger girl. What manufacturers say they want and what they picture in their own eyes is 2 different things.
I was a size 8/10 when I was her age and not considered particularly slim. I still have clothes from the 70s and 80s that Dd cannot fit into.
Remember our average height as a nation has only gone up 1” since 1980
Our average weight shouldn’t have gone up that much but it has exploded.