the point I brought up about Johnson's ennoblement of Fox silence. I didn't respond to it because I see it as absurd whataboutery. But if I must, I'll say that as reprehensible as Fox's comments were, she said them once - to my knowledge. She was young and foolish at the time and at the very least she does, when confronted with the charge - tackles the charge head on and apologises for it, unlike Corbyn who still lies about his IRA support to this day. Here he is on radio Ulster in 2015 refusing 5 times to condemn the PIRA personally.
www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02z3x45
The problem that I and so many other people have with this line of argument is that at no point did Corbyn try "opening a dialogue with elected representatives" of any of the Unionist parties. He kowtowed to the IRA murderers [like a put upon schoolboy trying to join the bullies gang], as they were his favoured position.
Finally, let's not forget that this Brexit gov't is the one threatening that process.
First, off: there is no such thing as a "Brexit government". The Tory gov' had to be dragged kicking and screaming to deliver Brexit and it was only due to the Tory Party being in gov at the time of the ref', that the responsibility to deliver the decision became their responsibility.
Secondly: Your claim that the IRA are going to start murdering people again over petty bureaucracy is fantasy. As Gerry Adams, whose opinion still counts for a lot confirmed.
www.spiegel.de/international/europe/gerry-adams-a-1201660.html
This thread is about Liz Truss. Liz fucking Truss - not Jeremy Corbyn
You mean you need to have the last word? Sorry about that!