Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Man stalking woman, excused by saying he must be autistic..

397 replies

AutismIsStigmatised · 13/08/2022 14:11

I came across this video on TikTok today, I'll post the link below but in summary an unknown man posed as an amazon delivery person to get access to a block of flats this woman lives in. He was behaving strangely and wanted to give her a 'gift' which was some sort of cup / candle holder. She confronted him and he left, then came back up again, left again then came back up a third time with his hood up as though he was about to do something sinister. Very bloody creepy.

vm.tiktok.com/ZMNsQfG2W/

The comments are littered with people saying that he's 'clearly autistic'

Take a look and tell me what you think but as the parent of an autistic boy (and wife of an autistic adult) it really upsets me when people assume scary/criminal behaviour is due to autism. I know many people with autism and not one has ever behaved like that..

OP posts:
LydiaBennetsUglyBonnet · 13/08/2022 19:32

HailAdrian · 13/08/2022 19:21

The severely autistic person would be with a carer. The police would talk to the only person who can understand what they are saying.

They would still arrest him if he’d assaulted someone. A carer’s word isn’t enough to stop that. Do REALLY think they’d just walk away from the situation. Why do you think they arrest the man at The state?

Who told you autistic people are immune from arrest?

HailAdrian · 13/08/2022 19:33

wellhelloitsme · 13/08/2022 19:30

Please, tell me how a person can be arrested when they have literally no understanding of what is happening to them?

Do you really not think that a suspect of a crime isn't arrested if they don't understand what is happening?

They may (and obviously should) be arrested in a way that shows reasonable accommodations and there are clear guidelines for police in sensitively and safely managing arrests of suspects with additional needs.

But what's your genuine belief of what would happen if a non verbal, autistic person harmed someone in public but had no understanding of it being wrong? That the police wouldn't arrest them? They absolutely would because their duty of care means they are tasked with minimising risk to the public and de-escalating live incidents.

What do you think would happen in such an instance, if you don't believe they wouldn't be arrested?

Do you seriously think they would be taken to court? What do YOU think would happen after the arrest?

secular39 · 13/08/2022 19:33

HailAdrian · 13/08/2022 19:09

To be clear, no, the police will not arrest a person who literally cannot understand their rights being read to them. They don't even know what a police officer is.

Disclaimer: this does not apply to high functioning individuals who know exactly what they're doing and the difference between right and wrong.

This kind of comment irks me a bit.

High functioning Autism that you understand the nuisance of appropriate social behaviours. In fact, it's most often the "high functioning Autistic people" who are ended up in the criminal justice system. I have seen this many times. Young children/teens who are deemed high functioning (are academic, have relatively good academic skills, very articulate) are wrongly assumed that they do not need therapies targeting mental health, consent, appropriate social communication training etc. it's only when they get to adulthood that it all gets tits up. Please don't assume that because someone is "high functioning" does not mean that they won't commit dangerous and inappropriate Autism.

In fact, the person in the video, who is presumably living on his own, maybe has a degree, is articulate may be deemed as high/mid functioning,

HailAdrian · 13/08/2022 19:34

LydiaBennetsUglyBonnet · 13/08/2022 19:29

When he is an adult, a fully horn large man, there’s very little a (likely female) carer could do should he decide to assault someone.

Please do not think your son will never go on the hurt someone because he has a carer with him. He hurts YOU by your own admission. And if he did, he would, rightly, be arrested.

Likely female? The majority of carers for autistic individuals I've encountered are male.

HailAdrian · 13/08/2022 19:35

secular39 · 13/08/2022 19:33

This kind of comment irks me a bit.

High functioning Autism that you understand the nuisance of appropriate social behaviours. In fact, it's most often the "high functioning Autistic people" who are ended up in the criminal justice system. I have seen this many times. Young children/teens who are deemed high functioning (are academic, have relatively good academic skills, very articulate) are wrongly assumed that they do not need therapies targeting mental health, consent, appropriate social communication training etc. it's only when they get to adulthood that it all gets tits up. Please don't assume that because someone is "high functioning" does not mean that they won't commit dangerous and inappropriate Autism.

In fact, the person in the video, who is presumably living on his own, maybe has a degree, is articulate may be deemed as high/mid functioning,

Yeah, that's basically what I've said.

Bubblebubblebah · 13/08/2022 19:38

Anyhooo.

Back to the actual victim some tried very hard to distract from. Is there any update about police taking an action or was she just told to be vigilant and get security cam?

whumpthereitis · 13/08/2022 19:39

A profoundly autistic person who presents a danger to others can be arrested. They may not be fit to stand trial, but they be detained under the mental health act and placed in a secure psychiatric hospital.

Butitsnotfunnyisititsserious · 13/08/2022 19:40

Bubblebubblebah · 13/08/2022 19:38

Anyhooo.

Back to the actual victim some tried very hard to distract from. Is there any update about police taking an action or was she just told to be vigilant and get security cam?

There's a recent video of him talking to her through the door that he wants her to take her top off. Not sure what else is happening though

secular39 · 13/08/2022 19:42

Sigh typoS

Just because someone is high functioning Autistic, does not mean that they get appropriate social communication. I see these sometimes with parents, particularly the ones who advocate the Asperger's label and don't want their kids to be put in the same bracket as the severe Autistic kids. These parents often embrace their High functioning DC's (I.e. don't seek help for their "minor" needs, don't work on social communication, academic is primarily their priority).

I used to work in Youth detention centre as part of my training for my job. I can guarantee you that half of the young people I'd come across had high functioning ASD, ADHD, Speech language and communication needs, Learning Disabilities (but something you wouldn't easily notice as they are very functioning) and when you go herb their case history, discuss about what support they had at primary, secondary- it's the same thing over and over again--/ they had no support and once support was offered at secondary, it went tits up and there was no point as the young person did not want to engage.

Take my advice for the parents with "high functioning ASD"- please do not rely solely upon your children academic skills and going to university. That's great and all and I'm all about pushing our kids. But always always work on social communication skills, discuss about relationships, consent, mental health, appropriate:/not appropriate communication...get a psychologist, life coach, Speech Therapist etc etc etc.

HailAdrian · 13/08/2022 19:43

whumpthereitis · 13/08/2022 19:39

A profoundly autistic person who presents a danger to others can be arrested. They may not be fit to stand trial, but they be detained under the mental health act and placed in a secure psychiatric hospital.

A profoundly autistic person should never be away from an adult who understands them and their needs. Can you imagine how traumatic that would be to a man or woman who doesn't understand anything?

Bubblebubblebah · 13/08/2022 19:44

Butitsnotfunnyisititsserious · 13/08/2022 19:40

There's a recent video of him talking to her through the door that he wants her to take her top off. Not sure what else is happening though

Bloody hell😳

wellhelloitsme · 13/08/2022 19:45

@HailAdrian

Do you seriously think they would be taken to court? What do YOU think would happen after the arrest?

Firstly, you said they wouldn't be arrested. They would.

Secondly, after the arrest they would be taken to the station and the custody officer would, as with everyone they process, ask the suspect if they have a disability. Obviously someone non verbal (which was the example you asked about) wouldn't communicate this so they would be assigned an appropriate adult to support them through the interview process. A force medical officer would also be heavily involved.

If a charge is then made as a result of the arrest, their solicitor (a legal aid one if the quality) will usually request to have a longer period to prepare for court in order to get the results of independent assessments from professionals in order to establish capacity.

A magistrate can then decide whether to pursue a criminal case or put into place next steps that involve psychiatric support either as an outpatient or potentially in a facility that meets their treatment needs.

HTH.

LydiaBennetsUglyBonnet · 13/08/2022 19:45

Kanaloa · 13/08/2022 19:23

Yes true, she was very fortunate to escape unharmed. I did wonder why she ran outside and down the back steps though? Did I misunderstand part of the video maybe? If I was her I’d have gone back into the flat and locked the door while ringing the police. What if he’d caught her on the steps?

She’d locked her front door ad she was trying to leave for the day, and there likely wasn’t enough time to unlock, get in and lock it again before he reached her. Running and screaming for help was 100% the right thing to do. I’ve actually just shown my DD this as an example of what to do in a Similar situation.

wellhelloitsme · 13/08/2022 19:45

wellhelloitsme · 13/08/2022 19:45

@HailAdrian

Do you seriously think they would be taken to court? What do YOU think would happen after the arrest?

Firstly, you said they wouldn't be arrested. They would.

Secondly, after the arrest they would be taken to the station and the custody officer would, as with everyone they process, ask the suspect if they have a disability. Obviously someone non verbal (which was the example you asked about) wouldn't communicate this so they would be assigned an appropriate adult to support them through the interview process. A force medical officer would also be heavily involved.

If a charge is then made as a result of the arrest, their solicitor (a legal aid one if the quality) will usually request to have a longer period to prepare for court in order to get the results of independent assessments from professionals in order to establish capacity.

A magistrate can then decide whether to pursue a criminal case or put into place next steps that involve psychiatric support either as an outpatient or potentially in a facility that meets their treatment needs.

HTH.

And in case you say 'I never said they wouldn't be arrested' here are your exact words:

To be clear, no, the police will not arrest a person who literally cannot understand their rights being read to them. They don't even know what a police officer is.

LydiaBennetsUglyBonnet · 13/08/2022 19:47

shandywan · 13/08/2022 19:27

@LydiaBennetsUglyBonnet it's not the same type of 'arrested' though. If he for whatever reason escaped one of his carers and did something illegal, such as bite a chunk out of someone (he's done that to me once), the police might arrive yes and they'd take just one look and know very instantly he's severely disabled. And they would probably do it anyway, but would know full well the rights they read out will be falling on death ears

And then they'd get him to the station and probably be driving their wondering what the bloody hell to do and how to manage him as he has no understanding or ability to verbalise. They'd be falling over theme levels for medical help to determine what they were dealing with

It really wouldn't be the same sort of 'arrest' if he was indeed arrested

Do you really think police officers never had to deal with a severely disabled person? That they never arrested one? Do you really think that they’d sit bemused after an arrest? Please do not think they wouldn’t arrest someone or not take it further.

HailAdrian · 13/08/2022 19:47

wellhelloitsme · 13/08/2022 19:45

@HailAdrian

Do you seriously think they would be taken to court? What do YOU think would happen after the arrest?

Firstly, you said they wouldn't be arrested. They would.

Secondly, after the arrest they would be taken to the station and the custody officer would, as with everyone they process, ask the suspect if they have a disability. Obviously someone non verbal (which was the example you asked about) wouldn't communicate this so they would be assigned an appropriate adult to support them through the interview process. A force medical officer would also be heavily involved.

If a charge is then made as a result of the arrest, their solicitor (a legal aid one if the quality) will usually request to have a longer period to prepare for court in order to get the results of independent assessments from professionals in order to establish capacity.

A magistrate can then decide whether to pursue a criminal case or put into place next steps that involve psychiatric support either as an outpatient or potentially in a facility that meets their treatment needs.

HTH.

OK well somehow I doubt you'll find many examples of non verbal, severely autistic men and women being arrested..as pp said, they kind of have to be with a carer all of the time.

LydiaBennetsUglyBonnet · 13/08/2022 19:47

shandywan · 13/08/2022 19:28

If we allow that kind of exemption then we would be fucked. Every dangerous man would claim he’s not arrestable because of XYZ.

Oh come on. Severe, profound autism is bloody obvious and can't just be 'claimed' Hmm

Why not? It may be obvious to YOU but if we announced that police officers couldn’t ever arrest a severely autistic person no matter what, you don’t think people would try it on?

LydiaBennetsUglyBonnet · 13/08/2022 19:49

HailAdrian · 13/08/2022 19:29

I should have said 'if he's with a carer.' Also, with this 'type' of autism the perpetrator could just as easily be female. Severely autistic people tend to lash out as an immediate response to something, they can't plan an attack, they don't have that capability.

Being with a carer doesn’t make you exempt from arrest. And it would count for women too

HailAdrian · 13/08/2022 19:50

LydiaBennetsUglyBonnet · 13/08/2022 19:47

Do you really think police officers never had to deal with a severely disabled person? That they never arrested one? Do you really think that they’d sit bemused after an arrest? Please do not think they wouldn’t arrest someone or not take it further.

You're hardly worth responding to as you are desperate for a stranger on the internet to believe their child will be arrested eventually but even you must know that the circumstances of a profoundly autistic individual being arrested would be entirely different to most arrests.

SortOfAdmireQuagmire · 13/08/2022 19:50

HailAdrian · 13/08/2022 19:43

A profoundly autistic person should never be away from an adult who understands them and their needs. Can you imagine how traumatic that would be to a man or woman who doesn't understand anything?

Why would anyone care about your son’s trauma if he’s strangling someone?

Neither his trauma nor his ability to remain conscious matter at all at the point he’s trying to seriously hurt someone.

LydiaBennetsUglyBonnet · 13/08/2022 19:52

HailAdrian · 13/08/2022 19:31

OK, the more you say, the more obvious you make it that you know fuck all about autism. Severely autistic individuals cannot function in society without a carer (a parent can be a carer too). If a severely autistic person was found wandering about alone, the relevant authorities would be contacted and they would be taken somewhere for their own safety.

I’m sure they would.

But what would happen before someone realised they’re a ‘lost’ severely autistic person? As I’ve said before they don’t wear badges or have identifiable features.

What I’m saying is, whilst they can’t be without a carer, it doesn’t mean they wouldn’t assault someone. And if they assaulted someone, they’d still be arrested, even when with a carer. A PP has shared her story and helpfully the rights of the arrested person (although no one is entitled to a phone call, no matter their status, just a solicitor).

HailAdrian · 13/08/2022 19:52

Actually, @LydiaBennetsUglyBonnet , why don't you bugger off to the special needs board and tell the parents of severely autistic and occasionally violent children the same? Maybe you could learn something.

wellhelloitsme · 13/08/2022 19:52

@HailAdrian

OK well somehow I doubt you'll find many examples of non verbal, severely autistic men and women being arrested..as pp said, they kind of have to be with a carer all of the time.

You keep asking questions then when people answer them, you move the goalposts / deflect.

You said this:

To be clear, no, the police will not arrest a person who literally cannot understand their rights being read to them.

You are absolutely, 100% wrong.

And misinformation like you saying they wouldn't be arrested shouldn't be stayed confidently when it's wrong.

And when you find out it's wrong, it's odd and unfair to not just say oh ok I was wrong about that I didn't realise.

gotelltheoldmandowntheroad · 13/08/2022 19:53

HailAdrian · 13/08/2022 18:40

How do his internal thoughts stop the person feeling harassed or being harassed?

When did I say they did?

Right they don't. So what's your point in mentioning them?

LydiaBennetsUglyBonnet · 13/08/2022 19:53

HailAdrian · 13/08/2022 19:33

Do you seriously think they would be taken to court? What do YOU think would happen after the arrest?

They may, yes. Just like the man from the Tate. But that’s the point of an arrest - to determine the situation and ultimately pass on a file to the CPS to see if it’s worth charging them.