Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder why Glasgow Satantic ring isn't headline news?!

130 replies

CoastalWave · 03/08/2022 15:08

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-62384842

Not often i'm speechless.

How is this buried within the news?! Should this not be headline?

It's beyond disturbing.

Those poor children

OP posts:
viques · 04/08/2022 00:08

If it is a case not due to come to trial until next year then not much can be said about it so as not to prejudice the trial/ influence possible jurors . The more idle gossip and speculation there is the more chance of the accused being able to claim the trial is unfair.

Confusednewmum1 · 04/08/2022 00:12

Also glasgow based and hadn’t heard of it until today on social media- Ive had the radio on all day! Why is this being hidden

FreyaStorm · 04/08/2022 00:34

Possibly they are devotees of the “redemption through sin” belief system. Not very well known but definitely a feature of many prominent people in society. Chilling. And perhaps why it’s not more ‘headline’ news.

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 04/08/2022 02:29

Confusednewmum1 · 04/08/2022 00:12

Also glasgow based and hadn’t heard of it until today on social media- Ive had the radio on all day! Why is this being hidden

In what way is it being 'hidden'?

It's being reported on one of the most prominent websites in UK media. Whoever is allegedly trying to 'hide' it is doing a shit-awful job.

It's not even at trial stage yet. The TV and radio media do not, as a rule, run a bulletin headline piece every time someone in Scotland is charged with a criminal offence. Perhaps it's only 'hidden' in the sense that your expectation to have heard about this on the radio is completely misguided?

MarshaMelrose · 04/08/2022 02:37

Something like this was investigated in the 1980s/90s in the north of England. Both police and social workers were sure it was true. It turned out to be totally unsubstantiated and when the evidence was really examined, it just sort of crumbled away.
Let's hope this is similar otherwise those poor children and animals.

ImperioMarch · 04/08/2022 07:08

Whataretheodds · 03/08/2022 16:25

Im bothered by the BBC using the term "child sex" rather than "child rape", which is what it actually is.

Because that's not how the statutory offence is worded, no matter how society might feel about it morally.

This is court reporting, they can't go off piste as it can be deemed to be prejudicing a fair trial. And prejudicing them is how trials have collapsed in the past.

ImperioMarch · 04/08/2022 07:14

it was one of the only articles that was closed to comments.
This is because it's an active court case. It's standard practice where proceedings are ongoing. Proceedings are active from first appearance on indictment through to conclusion of trial.

It's to prevent people who think accused equals guilty making comments that prejudice a fair trial and the proceedings potentially collapsing as a result.

ImperioMarch · 04/08/2022 07:17

JamesGetIn · 03/08/2022 20:47

The language used throughout the entire BBC article is very odd...:

Prosecutors state all 11 are said to have got the boy and the older girl to take part in "seances (and) use a Ouija board...to call on spirits and demons".

They also allegedly got the children involved in "witchcraft", leading them to believe that they themselves had "metamorphosed into animals".

The 11 are further said to have worn cloaks and devil horns as well making the young boy stab a budgie to death.

The group are also accused of killing a number of dogs, including getting the children to attack the animals.

"Got the boy", "got the children", "making the boy", "getting the children".

It's the oddest language I've ever come across in a supposedly reputable source.

Very fishy...

It's not fishy at all. You can't name children in court proceedings and they children are not the accused, therefore the adults are accused of inciting them.

Vivi0 · 04/08/2022 07:40

It seems that 5 of the 11 accused have died by suicide since the arrests were made last year.

sashh · 04/08/2022 10:05

Dotjones · 03/08/2022 16:07

The SNP are trying to hush this up because it doesn't reflect well on Scotland. Scotland has a terrible history with witchcraft (the British story of witches being persecuted is above all a Scottish one, though one wouldn't think it because the SNP do a good job of hushing it up), the last one being executed as recently as 1727, long after other countries ceased the hunt.

It is shocking to hear that witchcraft is still practiced north of the border and I'm not suprised - though disappointed - that Sturgeon & co. don't want this getting out.

Whereas in England the last prosecution was in 1944.

IncompleteSenten · 04/08/2022 10:07

The satanic thing is a red herring.

This is a child abuse 'ring' sadly like many more.

I think people shouldn't be distracted by or focus on the so called witchcraft thing.

FayeGovan · 04/08/2022 10:10

Dotjones · 03/08/2022 16:07

The SNP are trying to hush this up because it doesn't reflect well on Scotland. Scotland has a terrible history with witchcraft (the British story of witches being persecuted is above all a Scottish one, though one wouldn't think it because the SNP do a good job of hushing it up), the last one being executed as recently as 1727, long after other countries ceased the hunt.

It is shocking to hear that witchcraft is still practiced north of the border and I'm not suprised - though disappointed - that Sturgeon & co. don't want this getting out.

Oh for gods sake ive heard it all now on mumsnet. I know the snp and nicola sturgeon are utterly vilified on here but blaming them for something that happened in 1727 is really pushing it 🤣🤣

JustLyra · 04/08/2022 10:17

Sometimes this site is baffling.

How is Earth is something that’s being reported by the BBC, and multiple others, being “hushed up”?

And how are so many people so unaware of how things work that basics such as comments being closed seem suspicious?

Not to mention the fact that details are limited because they’ve not been to court yet and to protect the identities of the children.

The bloodthirst for details that is so prevalent now is one day going to destroy a trial and see someone guilty of something awful walk free. I’m convinced of it.

Karenxo · 04/08/2022 10:25

Also kids don't fit in microwaves.

They said it was a newborn. Presumably forcefully folded into unnatural shapes. They also said it didn't work, just that they tried to.

I'm also fairly sure I've heard of this happening in America with a baby. Of course older children don't fit in microwaves.

10HailMarys · 04/08/2022 11:33

I'm a media relations specialist and I've worked as a press officer in the criminal justice system so I'll share my professional perspective on this.

It's worth noting that although charges have been brought, the actual trial won't start for at least a year, so all reporting at this stage has to be very, very careful and limited to certain information, to avoid prejudicing the trial. What's been reported so far is literally all that can be said at this stage - this is the very earliest point in the proceedings and they can't really report anything more now until the trial starts, which will be September 2023 at the earliest according to the article. It's when the trial starts that the story becomes bigger news. Technically, that is when it becomes 'in the public interest' to cover it more extensively.

I suspect that when the case actually comes to court next year, it will be covered a lot more extensively in all the press, and even more so of course if the defendants are found guilty.

I understand your point because it's an extremely shocking and lurid set of allegations, but it has been reported factually in all the major news outlets and with my professional hat on, I'd it's had pretty much the amount and type of coverage that I would expect at this very early stage in the proceedings. I think there will definitely be a lot more when there's more that the press can actually say.

10HailMarys · 04/08/2022 11:36

FreyaStorm · 04/08/2022 00:34

Possibly they are devotees of the “redemption through sin” belief system. Not very well known but definitely a feature of many prominent people in society. Chilling. And perhaps why it’s not more ‘headline’ news.

It's because of this kind of speculation that the press have to close comments on their stories about court cases. It's not helpful and it can be prejudicial.

wellhelloitsme · 04/08/2022 17:10

Whataretheodds · 03/08/2022 16:25

Im bothered by the BBC using the term "child sex" rather than "child rape", which is what it actually is.

Me too. Disgusting of them.

I've just made a complaint online to the BBC.

It's the same as people using the phrase 'child porn' instead of child abuse pictures / videos.

Completely minimises sexual abuse and rape of children.

kmblark · 04/08/2022 18:32

myyellowcar · 03/08/2022 15:42

Yep! This was my thought

What, unironically?

OMG12 · 04/08/2022 18:53

This is really bizarre. How can a child fit in a microwave. Most of my plates can’t.

what this is is a drug filled peadophile ring.

so what kind of satanists put horns on their head? What do they mean by “witchcraft”? This sounds like so drugged up paedos playing dress up or someone feeding the kids things to do in some attempt to reignite the satanic panic. Watch the Paradise Lost films or more recently and the fictional equivalent in stranger things

As someone who is into the occult:western esotericism even today it’s not uncommon to feel persecution, people don’t understand it and either ridicule or paint it as evil when nothing could be further from the truth. People doing yoga don’t get this

ImperioMarch · 04/08/2022 19:49

@wellhelloitsme as pointed out before this is almost always down to the wording of the statutory offence with which the accused is charged. The journalist is not at liberty to state it's rape when that's not what the accused has been charged with 🙄

wellhelloitsme · 04/08/2022 20:12

ImperioMarch · 04/08/2022 19:49

@wellhelloitsme as pointed out before this is almost always down to the wording of the statutory offence with which the accused is charged. The journalist is not at liberty to state it's rape when that's not what the accused has been charged with 🙄

They can say child abuse then, no?

That's highly preferable to the phrase 'child sex'.

Not sure if the eye roll was directed at me but if it was I'm not sure why!

ScreamingMeMe · 04/08/2022 20:15

bellac11 · 03/08/2022 16:30

Each time child abuse is discussed, it is insinuated that abusers in rings dont get caught or prosecuted or the children are not believed because the rings are made up of men of Muslim/asian groups and the police or social workers ignore the children because of that. Which doesnt make sense because the examples given are of rings that were prosecuted.

And that the media doesnt report it or its hidden away because of a fear of looking racist

Despite that child sex abusers are made up from all manner of communities in the UK.

I knew what you were getting at, bellac.

ImperioMarch · 04/08/2022 21:00

@wellhelloitsme no they can't. That's not what the statutory offence and at this point it's an allegation

wellhelloitsme · 04/08/2022 21:06

ImperioMarch · 04/08/2022 21:00

@wellhelloitsme no they can't. That's not what the statutory offence and at this point it's an allegation

I don't understand why the phrase "child abuse" couldn't have been used in the headline, when the body copy clearly states that they are charged with "abusing three young children".

It says:

"Seven men and four women are charged with abusing three young children in Glasgow during a 10-year period."

AffIt · 04/08/2022 21:12

bellac11 · 03/08/2022 15:33

Hiding it away to try to protect the perpetrators because of their ethnicity..... oh wait....

Ethnicity? With surnames like Brannan, Forbes and Clark, all of which are perfectly 'white' Scottish surnames?

Oh, that wasn't what you meant, though, was it?

Swipe left for the next trending thread