Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be so upset that the leader of the Rochdale grooming gang has been allowed to stay in the UK!

252 replies

vermicello · 28/06/2022 09:02

www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/ringleader-rochdales-infamous-sex-grooming-24336978

Those poor girls. It is like they have been abused twice, first by him and his fellow groomers and secondly by the UK justice system, police and social workers. It is sending them a big message that their right to feel safe and protected is not a concern. I can't imagine how traumatic it must be to know you could bump into your abuser at any time and nothing can be done about it. Our justice system is a disgrace.

To top it all off, he has apparently received hundreds of thousands of pounds in legal aid courtesy of taxpayers. I really don't want my taxes wasted on people like him. So upsetting and infuriating!

OP posts:
AmaryIlis · 28/06/2022 17:08

RudsyFarmer · 28/06/2022 09:48

I wonder whether the new British Bill of Rights will help in these situations. A long time ago I remember a story where the person claimed a pet cat was enough family to prevent deportation.

No, what you remember there is Theresa May's direct lie about the facts. The whole story was absolute rubbish.

SofiaSoFar · 28/06/2022 17:11

Puzzledandpissedoff · 28/06/2022 17:04

''Grooming gang ringleader was employed by council as welfare officer, major report reveals'' www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/grooming-gang-ringleader-was-employed-by-council-as-welfare-officer-major-report-reveals/ar-AAYEZRL

I really wish I hadn't read that - it's no surprise with Oldham council, but that's hardly much consolation Hmm

(Just to make above link clickable)

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/grooming-gang-ringleader-was-employed-by-council-as-welfare-officer-major-report-reveals/ar-AAYEZRL

What an appalling set of failures by various authorities.

Those poor girls. 😡

DizzyWhoreI8O4 · 28/06/2022 17:23

Thelnebriati · 28/06/2022 13:22

But it's ok for rapists to walk free on the streets of the country he would theoretically be deported to?
Where are you getting that idea from?

Why does the safety of women and children in another country matter less?
Are you saying Other Countries have less satisfactory justice systems than the UK?
Do you think 4 years was justice for his crimes here?

In this case, he had dual citizenship and gave up one. He was not a refugee.

Where are you getting that idea from?

From the posters who think that sending dangerous sex offenders to likely re-offend in other countries is a good idea, because at least they're not in the UK.

Do you think 4 years was justice for his crimes here?

Absolutely not, as I've said several times on this thread.

Sentencing for these sorts of crimes needs to be addressed and made far more severe. But shipping UK citizens off to other countries is not the solution.

AmaryIlis · 28/06/2022 17:26

Florenz · 28/06/2022 10:14

Sorry but in any instance where there is a conflict of interest between the rights of a criminal and the law abiding public, I side with the law-abiders. Every time.

But what is the conflict of interest? Your perceived view that a British citizen should be deported even though there is no country that would agree to take them?

Or is it the fact that people accused of crime get legal aid for a defence?

Take this scenario. 11 year old girl is abducted and brutally murdered. A local young man from a family of immigrants is accused by other girls of indecent exposure, and is arrested by the police who question him intensively for three days without a lawyer being present, after which he confesses. That's a horrible crime, right, he must be bang to rights, he shouldn't get legal aid, should he?

The trouble is, the young man in question is Stefan Kiszko, who was wrongly convicted of the murder of Lesley Molseed. Those young girls later admitted they had made the indecent exposure accusation for a laugh, witnesses the police had never bothered to look for fully confirmed that he was miles away at the relevant time, and forensic evidence demonstrated conclusively that he was not the murderer. Do you still think he shouldn't be given legal aid?

You will no doubt say that no-one thinks the Rochdale man is innocent. But no-one knew that before his trial, just as no-one knew in Kiszko's case. If we could determine before a trial who is innocent and therefore deserving of legal aid, we wouldn't need trials at all. Sadly it really isn't that easy to work out, as history has demonstrated time after time.

DizzyWhoreI8O4 · 28/06/2022 17:30

@AmaryIlis excellent post.

feellikeanalien · 28/06/2022 17:37

The scandal here is not that he is not being deported it is the way the entire Rochdale saga was handled. The girls were not believed and the victim blaming and cover ups were appalling.

Then the sentences handed down were derisory.

Until the police, social services and the courts start to put the victims interests first nothing will change.

If he was still in jail, where he should be, then this deportation issue would never have arisen.

I agree that taking away human rights, even of scumbags, can be the start of the slippery slope, especially with this government. It does make me wonder about the timing of all this bearing in mind the recent ECHR decision over Rwanda. The tabloids are very good at stirring people up.

woodhill · 28/06/2022 17:42

Puzzledandpissedoff · 28/06/2022 17:04

''Grooming gang ringleader was employed by council as welfare officer, major report reveals'' www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/grooming-gang-ringleader-was-employed-by-council-as-welfare-officer-major-report-reveals/ar-AAYEZRL

I really wish I hadn't read that - it's no surprise with Oldham council, but that's hardly much consolation Hmm

That makes the whole thing even more disgusting

Grotbag81 · 28/06/2022 17:52

Manchester's response to it hasn't helped :-

www.google.com/amp/s/www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/protesters-boo-andy-burnham-first-24337066.amp

Oldham Council live CSE meeting 27/6/22 where elected officials roll their eyes and have contempt for the public and victims mentioned in the report, who called out the lies at meeting. Even one their own councillors commented on the smug looks of the panel:-

Threepeonies · 28/06/2022 17:57

PetraBP · 28/06/2022 13:49

They should only be allowed to stay in the UK under lock and key.

Give them a choice- lifelong imprisonment here or freedom in Pakistan with no option of ever returning.

Third option of lethal injection if either of the first two don’t appeal.

Just Asians right, not those white men who rape people? Your post is horrific

Florenz · 28/06/2022 17:58

It's disgusting. Labour really needs to sort themselves out because it's stuff like that the Tories will put out during election season. Who hired the rapist?

Threepeonies · 28/06/2022 17:59

MintJulia · 28/06/2022 15:08

I don't agree with the decision. He had alternative citizenship at the time of the offences. That should be what counts. He chose to sign it away. That makes statelessness his problem, not the UK's.

He should be deported, as should his co-perpetrators.

If he is stateless where do you propose deporting him to, the moon?

Florenz · 28/06/2022 18:05

"If he is stateless where do you propose deporting him to, the moon?"
Why are you defending him? Who cares where he is deported to? Chuck him in the sea in international waters. Drop him from a helicopter over Antarctica. I honestly couldn't care less what happens to him as long as he is not in the UK preying on young girls. People who defending him by engaging in "oh so clever" arguments about legal technicalities need to take a look at themselves.

woodhill · 28/06/2022 18:11

Can't they hurt him financially

Has he had to pay anything out his own pocket

Threepeonies · 28/06/2022 18:15

Florenz · 28/06/2022 18:05

"If he is stateless where do you propose deporting him to, the moon?"
Why are you defending him? Who cares where he is deported to? Chuck him in the sea in international waters. Drop him from a helicopter over Antarctica. I honestly couldn't care less what happens to him as long as he is not in the UK preying on young girls. People who defending him by engaging in "oh so clever" arguments about legal technicalities need to take a look at themselves.

I believe in equality and a fair legal system.

I think his sentence was too short, I think the sentencing and crime rates around sexual assault and rape are horrific and I believe we need to do something about it.

I do not believe we get to treat asian people any differently to white people. I do not believe we get to treat british citizens as less than british citizens when it suits us. History has taught us that as soon as you start to treat one sort of citizen differently to another horrific things can happen.

So if white british citizens are sentenced and incarcerated in this country then that happens to brown and black ones too.

I have in no way defended him or what he has done.

But your comment is utterly ridiculous. If you cannot work out where the hell to send someone who is stateless then I don't know how you expect the government to work it out.

We don't just get to send our criminals where ever we want in the world any more. So actually unless you do have an idea of where he could go then how on earth do you expect anyone to carry it out.

And no I don't need to take a look at myself. Some of the racist people on this thread do though. A horrific crime doesn't make it okay for racist sentiments to come crawling out of the woodwork.

DizzyWhoreI8O4 · 28/06/2022 18:23

Florenz · 28/06/2022 18:05

"If he is stateless where do you propose deporting him to, the moon?"
Why are you defending him? Who cares where he is deported to? Chuck him in the sea in international waters. Drop him from a helicopter over Antarctica. I honestly couldn't care less what happens to him as long as he is not in the UK preying on young girls. People who defending him by engaging in "oh so clever" arguments about legal technicalities need to take a look at themselves.

Nobody is defending him. Not one single person on this thread has done so.

I honestly couldn't care less what happens to him as long as he is not in the UK preying on young girls.

But you're ok with him being sent to another country to prey on young girls there?

Rather than make silly statements about dropping him into the sea, do something useful and campaign for the more severe sentencing for these types of crimes.

wonderstuff · 28/06/2022 18:31

He’s a UK citizen and everyone is and should be entitled to a qualified defence when charged with a criminal offence. The taxpayer isn’t wasting money on legal aid, they’re upholding basic human rights. I don’t believe we should be removing anyones citizenship, I’m sure Pakistan don’t want him either.

The sentence he received is a joke, but that’s a different topic.

AmaryIlis · 28/06/2022 18:44

Florenz · 28/06/2022 17:58

It's disgusting. Labour really needs to sort themselves out because it's stuff like that the Tories will put out during election season. Who hired the rapist?

I doubt that even the Tories would be that stupid. They would have to explain how all this happened under their watch.

Fancydancer1934 · 28/06/2022 18:45

I wonder if opinions woukd change if we knew the ethnicity of the victims. My understanding is that the victims of this particular gang where white British. If the victims were same ethnicity as the perpetrators - would that make a difference?

AmaryIlis · 28/06/2022 18:48

Florenz · 28/06/2022 18:05

"If he is stateless where do you propose deporting him to, the moon?"
Why are you defending him? Who cares where he is deported to? Chuck him in the sea in international waters. Drop him from a helicopter over Antarctica. I honestly couldn't care less what happens to him as long as he is not in the UK preying on young girls. People who defending him by engaging in "oh so clever" arguments about legal technicalities need to take a look at themselves.

Because that would be murde, and our constitution and laws don't allow the state to commit murder. How would descending below his level help in any way? It's not as if he would even have qualified for the death penalty if we still had it.

Absolutely no-one is defending him. Pointing out the realities is not a defence. Just because you have decided you would like the state to kills someone in your name, explaining how that cannot happen is not defending one iota what this man did.

Kidsaretryingtodestroyme · 28/06/2022 18:55

He received a crap sentence but he’s a legal U.K. citizen who committed his crimes in the U.K. against U.K. citizens. This is our problem not Pakistan’s.

Some of you are so thick but now it’s now clear why the country is almost broke and why we have people willing to give up their own HUMAN rights in order to punish people like this rapist. And what will you say when rules are changed and in exchange for this rapist going to Pakistan, we receive hundreds of peadophiles from Thailand?

You deserve to be broke, whilst working zero hours in between queuing up at the food bank with no healthcare whilst you work yourselves to death and your kids go to crumbling schools.

I’m mixed raced with an immigrant parent. If a higher bar is put on us, me and my (Antipodean) DH will take our higher tax paying selves elsewhere.

I’m sick of having to tip toe around thick racists for fear of being accused of sneering. You lot, who probably contribute the square root of fuck all, will destroy this county.

isadoradancing123 · 28/06/2022 19:43

The sooner the human rights act is abolished the better. He should either be in prison or deported

DizzyWhoreI8O4 · 28/06/2022 19:44

Kidsaretryingtodestroyme · 28/06/2022 18:55

He received a crap sentence but he’s a legal U.K. citizen who committed his crimes in the U.K. against U.K. citizens. This is our problem not Pakistan’s.

Some of you are so thick but now it’s now clear why the country is almost broke and why we have people willing to give up their own HUMAN rights in order to punish people like this rapist. And what will you say when rules are changed and in exchange for this rapist going to Pakistan, we receive hundreds of peadophiles from Thailand?

You deserve to be broke, whilst working zero hours in between queuing up at the food bank with no healthcare whilst you work yourselves to death and your kids go to crumbling schools.

I’m mixed raced with an immigrant parent. If a higher bar is put on us, me and my (Antipodean) DH will take our higher tax paying selves elsewhere.

I’m sick of having to tip toe around thick racists for fear of being accused of sneering. You lot, who probably contribute the square root of fuck all, will destroy this county.

👏👏👏

DizzyWhoreI8O4 · 28/06/2022 19:46

isadoradancing123 · 28/06/2022 19:43

The sooner the human rights act is abolished the better. He should either be in prison or deported

Another chilling post.

As PPs have pointed out, I take it you're perfectly fine with him being sent to another country to abuse girls? And also for those guilty of similar crimes with 'ancestral links' to the UK to be sent here to do the same?

Tougher sentences, absolutely. Playing musical paedophiles, not so much.

Clavinova · 28/06/2022 19:49

How far back does someone have to have foreign ancestry to be deported?

According to this 2017 article, Abdul Aziz was born in Pakistan;

Some who received shorter sentences are believed to be out on licence while four members of the gang could be deported back to their homeland, Pakistan.

[Mohammed Sajid] came to the UK from the same village in Pakistan as co-defendant Abdul Aziz.

www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/men-rochdale-grooming-tariq-jail-13035428

BBC yesterday -
Aziz had renounced his Pakistani citizenship on 13 July, 2018, six years after he was jailed, but just days before the Court of Appeal ruled he could be deprived of his UK citizenship.

Rauf and Khan only renounced their Pakistani citizenship in September of the same year after the Court of Appeal ruling.

(The first article says that Khan came to Rochdale from Kashmir with his wife in 1997)

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-61957132

PetraBP · 28/06/2022 19:59

Intransigentcat · 28/06/2022 14:44

White men who are rapist paedophiles do not generally stay under lock and key for their entire lives they are released at the end of their sentence. So why is a poster suggesting that they should be murdered by the state or deported if they are not white!? Bear in mind this is a man with SOLELY British citizenship. You may not like that he is a brown man with British citizenship but those are simply the facts of this case.

Yes obviously the sentence is appalling low. Yes this system needs altering so that those under criminal investigation cannot change their citizenship status. But holy hell to some of the utterly insane rhetoric on this thread. Deporting people somewhere they have ancestral links? Totally unworkable and who decides which ancestral link and how far back? Pray tell will it just be far enough to remove mainly black and brown criminals, because frankly that seems like the aim.

Honestly threads like this make me understand how the car crash that is brexit happened. We have a nasty reservoir of racism and xenophobia in these fair isles. Sections of the population can be whipped into a frenzy by the media, and are seemingly devoid of any kind of critical thinking skills or foresight. It's like they wholeheartedly welcome a descent towards fascism and the removal of rights from us ALL. No wonder Boris can't be shifted.

If this judgement concerns you, and I cannot imagine the sentencing doesn't concern most, then instead of frothing about deporting brown people to places they don't have citizenship, work on defeating misogyny and the patriarchy. Fight for women's value in society to be held in higher esteem. Fight for tougher sentencing around rape, fight for the 'believe women', 'trust women' culture we should have. Fight for your daughters to become politicians, leaders, figureheads, to be the ones who mould policy. Teach your sons to become men who value women every bit as much as the value men.

And whatever you do, don't give into the kneejerk, right wing fuelled 'send em back' rhetoric. It serves no good purpose.

I wasn’t.

I’d happily lock up all child abusers for the rest of their lives, with the option of a lethal injection if they want an out.

Colour or ethnicity doesn’t come into it.

Swipe left for the next trending thread