@Kris02 it baffles me that people weigh in on immigration when they clearly don’t have any knowledge of the asylum system 😁
No, they haven’t “come here illegally”. Familiarise yourself with the 1951 refugee convention.
Yes it’s not a big deal to want control over your borders. So why do the conservative government reject plans like safe routes and resettlement schemes which would allow for them to control numbers, and instead allow the uncontrolled boat crossings to continue? That’s a government policy decision.
“Why is it only healthy young men??” has been answered 100 times, and the answer is much less surprising than anyone thinks. The journey from Iran/Afghanistan/Eritrea is physically very hard. Add into that the risks of violence against women and girls while on the journey and at camps in Libya, and it is incredibly risky to expect women and children to do that journey. The slavery camps in Libya (how you pay for your boat crossing when you don’t have money, or when you do have money but the people smugglers don’t consider it enough) are brutal and leave people with mental and physical scars. The vast majority of men will not put their family in such a dangerous position.
Instead women and children more often travel to refugee camps in neighbouring countries where conditions are bad, but are safer than the journey.
Also, statistics show that men are far more at risk of death in the countries that they are leaving than women and children.
Why did you think it was ok to write your post without even a basic understanding of any of these points?
Although you do (accidentally) hit on a truth that some of them are “running from the police”. In some cases, yes they are running from the police in their countries, as they face imprisonment, torture or state sanctified murder for their political or religious beliefs.
Honestly, even the most basic research about the places asylum seekers are coming from would have shown all of this.