Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Flight to Rwanda

1000 replies

lbab1702 · 14/06/2022 19:18

I’d love to get a flight to Rwanda. Beautiful country and people ( I’ve been there before) but I don’t understand why refugees to the U.K. should go there.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
AuntiePaulineLeft · 15/06/2022 21:15

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

TarasHarp55 · 15/06/2022 21:17

Lineala · 15/06/2022 21:10

Um, nazi Germany killing 6 million people says you're wrong. Your level of ignorance is amazing.

Right wing extremism in the UK is a growing concern. So far only individual people have been killed. Unlike the mass killings of the children at Manchester, and all the others. Why play it down.

TarasHarp55 · 15/06/2022 21:21

Um, nazi Germany killing 6 million people says you're wrong. Your level of ignorance is amazing.

By the way, when I referred to past atrocities I was referring to the Islamic terror attacks across the last 20 years or so. Sorry you failed to misinterpret what I said.

TarasHarp55 · 15/06/2022 21:22

Meant to say "chose to"

Tillsforthrills · 15/06/2022 21:31

Jott · 14/06/2022 20:28

To claim asylum in the UK you must physically be in the UK. Perhaps if the UK government was to change that rule and allow people to begin the application process from whichever country they're already in then those desperate people wouldn't need to risk their lives via an inflatable boat on the Channel.

This would be an ideal solution.

dreamingbohemian · 15/06/2022 21:37

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

So just to be clear, you're calling MI5 and the FBI idiots.

The people who have the most current intel on attempted attacks (which we will never hear about) and who have seen mass killings by right-wing terrorists around the world (Christchurch, Breivik, El Paso, etc etc etc oh yes and the attempted coup in Washington last year) -- they're idiots. When they say right-wing terrorism is a comparable threat, they have no idea what they're talking about.

TruthHertz · 15/06/2022 21:41

I already knew all the examples were going to be decades old. The Nazis/Stalin etc aren't going to commit a terrorist attack tomorrow. You can't say for sure that a radical Islamist won't.

It's shameful that in the face of what is currently happening to women in Afghanistan that many women still actively attempt to silence any debate around the troublesome parts of Islam.

LastTrainEast · 15/06/2022 21:44

"...as another PP said I’m struggling to understand when asylum seekers escaping bombs and beheadings have time to look at the marketing materials produced by the UK’s tourism industry"

i can help there. These are not asylum seekers escaping bombs and beheadings at all.

Roussette · 15/06/2022 21:47

Oh well.... Yvette Cooper took down PPatel in a very good way today in PMQs

twitter.com/BestForBritain/status/1537052385067016197

Facts matter.
Patel smirks.

TarasHarp55 · 15/06/2022 21:58

It's shameful that in the face of what is currently happening to women in Afghanistan that many women still actively attempt to silence any debate around the troublesome parts of Islam.

Yes I always find it odd how many want to play it down/ minimise it. Strange.

SunnyDayHeyfeverHell · 15/06/2022 21:59

I do wonder why people bleat 'Islam isn't a race' like some sort of bizarre gotcha. Does it make it any less morally wrong if discriminatory comments are made about a religion?

Discovereads · 15/06/2022 22:01

dreamingbohemian · 15/06/2022 21:37

So just to be clear, you're calling MI5 and the FBI idiots.

The people who have the most current intel on attempted attacks (which we will never hear about) and who have seen mass killings by right-wing terrorists around the world (Christchurch, Breivik, El Paso, etc etc etc oh yes and the attempted coup in Washington last year) -- they're idiots. When they say right-wing terrorism is a comparable threat, they have no idea what they're talking about.

Not calling MI5 or FBI idiots….
During the attempted coup the only few deaths that happened were among those storming the Capitol (one was an unarmed woman), so there was no mass killing by “right wing terrorists” there.

On a side note, I’ve read some of the reports you reference and could have sworn that right wing terrorism is listed as an emerging threat, not a comparable threat.

Certainly, when you look at the statistics of the people convicted of Terror Offences in the U.K. - which does include those arrested for conspiracy to attack or attempts to attack as well as successful attacks, you do still find a clear majority to be extreme Islamist.

“The majority (73%) of prisoners in custody for terrorism-related offences on 31 March 2021 declared themselves as Muslim. 25 prisoners (12%) were of a Christian denomination.”

See also attached table from p26 which shows the “right wing terrorists” are not a comparable threat.
researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7613/CBP-7613.pdf

Flight to Rwanda
Perfect28 · 15/06/2022 22:11

Wait so let me get this straight, you're looking for examples of white, right, Christian hate and extremism but we aren't allowed to draw those from 'too far back' in history, you also discredit the security services and government stating how this group pose a greater risk because that's 'too in the future, what might happen'. Then the 'evidence' that they aren't comparable (right now with current prisoners) actually demonstrates that the numbers of right wing and other extremist views are growing most rapidly. OK got it. Cool.

TruthHertz · 15/06/2022 22:13

SunnyDayHeyfeverHell · 15/06/2022 21:59

I do wonder why people bleat 'Islam isn't a race' like some sort of bizarre gotcha. Does it make it any less morally wrong if discriminatory comments are made about a religion?

The specific accusation for criticising Islam was 'racism'. Hence the comments about it not being a race.

Criticising Christianity is also racist.... said nobody ever.

Bingbangbongbash · 15/06/2022 22:16

How about loads of the American mass shootings? Or Anders Brievik?

Let me guess - the first doesn’t count because it’s domestic terror and the latter because it’s not UK/US.

Discovereads · 15/06/2022 22:19

@Perfect28
Then the 'evidence' that they aren't comparable (right now with current prisoners) actually demonstrates that the numbers of right wing and other extremist views are growing most rapidly.

Well yes, the evidence shows right wing terrorism to be an emerging threat not a comparable threat. You dont seem to know what “comparable” means? It means similar or equivalent. You can’t look at the evidence and say with a straight face that the two are at all similar or equivalent threats. They’re both threats, but one has been and is currently substantially larger than the other.

I don’t know what you mean by the rest of your post and can only presume that was directed to another poster.

TruthHertz · 15/06/2022 22:19

Perfect28 · 15/06/2022 22:11

Wait so let me get this straight, you're looking for examples of white, right, Christian hate and extremism but we aren't allowed to draw those from 'too far back' in history, you also discredit the security services and government stating how this group pose a greater risk because that's 'too in the future, what might happen'. Then the 'evidence' that they aren't comparable (right now with current prisoners) actually demonstrates that the numbers of right wing and other extremist views are growing most rapidly. OK got it. Cool.

Blah blah blah.

The original point was about vetting potential security threats like radical Islamists. Are you seriously attempting to argue that far right Christian groups pose the same level of threat in modern day Britain and are just as likely to nail bomb a concert?

Discovereads · 15/06/2022 22:22

Bingbangbongbash · 15/06/2022 22:16

How about loads of the American mass shootings? Or Anders Brievik?

Let me guess - the first doesn’t count because it’s domestic terror and the latter because it’s not UK/US.

Most US mass shootings are not terror related.
But in regards to terrorism in the U.K. that is domestic vs. International here are the statistics
”The majority of terrorism-related arrests made since 11 September 2001 have been classified as being related to international terrorism (79%)”

Flight to Rwanda
TruthHertz · 15/06/2022 22:25

What you're failing to take into account is that persecution doesn't usually target the same demographic the perpetrators are part of. So,white Christian extremists are less likely to target the descendents of white Christians compared with another group who fundamentally disagree with our way of life

newnamethanks · 15/06/2022 22:25

I understand that a government advisor has discovered he still has some remaining principles and understands what ethics are. Thank heavens he's resigned. What kind of politicians would we have if they were all like that?

newnamethanks · 15/06/2022 22:29

ALL mass shootings are terror related and perpetrated by extremists.

AmaryIlis · 15/06/2022 22:30

Freerangechildren · 15/06/2022 19:54

I have seen A LOT of racism on this thread and in the news, it is not okay to talk so badly of Rwanda, they are a developing nation and are looking forward to the new arrivals and no doubt the development aid will be extremely helpful.

The scheme is monitored carefully and thoroughly and the rooms look a hell of a lot better here. Plus they have a much better chance of playing football outside as it is no fun here for six months of the year.

I have no qualms about this policy. Rwanda know not to mess it up or all their aid disappears, so they are incentivised to look after the migrants.

It would be incredibly patronising to suppress the facts about Rwanda.

Rwanda knew equally well that they shouldn't mess things up with previous asylum seekers, but that didn't stop them doing so.

Perfect28 · 15/06/2022 22:32

Oh truth you really have swallowed the bs being fed to you.

AmaryIlis · 15/06/2022 22:34

Freerangechildren · 15/06/2022 20:00

There are a small but loud militant bunch of idealists on this thread, coming up a great deal, so I am thinking what vested interest requires people support a process that sees migrants drown at sea, and suggest tin pot ideas that will never work and still they seem to protest at the idea of a policy that might actually work...

You've been invited before to identify posts that support people dining at sea, and unsurprisingly haven't managed to do so. And you've never managed to explain how a safe passage + efficient asylum processing policy that Patel herself put forward at one point will never work.

Is there any danger that at some point you will actually address the facts instead of trying to pretend that they don't exist?

AmaryIlis · 15/06/2022 22:36

Oops, dying at sea. No problems here with people dining at sea.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread