To be concerned that the Depp/Heard trial has put off genuine DV victims from coming forward?

[PetraBP]

The Depp/Heard trial was troubling to me.

On the one hand, people do sometimes make false allegations, especially after relationship breakups.

On the other hand, dragging someone to court for alleging domestic violence might deter some women from reporting it.

Assuming the court got it right and Depp was not a perpetrator, how could he have handled the situation so that it would not put domestic violence victims off coming forward for fear of being sued?

Worrying all round.

yes the posts and responses are there for others to read and disagree with you.

Just like you are doing to pumper you mean?

She abusive, but so is Johnny Depp. This case is nothing more than a toxic relationship made public. Pumpers own words you are conveniently ignoring.

"Misandry? How so?"

You're still doing it. You care not a jot what people are posting. You're just goading.

You called me a misandrist. I’m entitled to ask why I deserve that.

Yep

i agree

"She abusive, but so is Johnny Depp. This case is nothing more than a toxic relationship made public."

And I agreed with pumper but she couldn't leave it there as she doesn't really believe that. As she's proved since making excuses for AH employing a sex pest.

"You called me a misandrist. I’m entitled to ask why I deserve that"

I'm entitled to think it based on your posts

You’re assuming I’m a woman then?

How am I a misandrist?

But you can’t explain why you think it?

Pumper
Are you a man then?
Am I a man?

Who cares?

She can leave it like that. It is what she thinks.

Why am I a misandrist?

But you can’t explain why you think it?

Same reason you think I'm a misogynist. .

Every single thread on MN has gone the same way. Every single one.

I think you’re a misogynist because you have repeated posted that Amber Heard is responsible for her sex-pest PR man. And despite it being pointed out to you loads of times, you keep repeating the lie that people think women never abuse, or that men are never victims.

Now you provide one single point that means I deserve to be called a misandrist. You can’t.

So you claim don't judge him (JD) guilty until proven so. Yet you judge that someone is lying and jumping on some sort of bandwagon before the case has even got to court

it’s this blinded belief in JD that has been driven by his legal team and pr team

It’s pitiful and far worse this is dangerous for society and for anyone going up again a rich powerful man

*against

"I think you’re a misogynist because you have repeated posted that Amber Heard is responsible for her sex-pest PR man"

On that basis I am then

And despite it being pointed out to you loads of times, you keep repeating the lie that people think women never abuse, or that men are never victims.

That's a lie if you actually read my posts

"it’s this blinded belief in JD that has been driven by his legal team and pr team "

How can available witness statements online from the court be driven by that?

Posters on here accusing Depp of guilt are free from your criticism then?

Ok, I’m not asking again. You clearly have no reason to call me a misandrist, you’re just annoyed at being called out for your views on Depp’s victims.

"Ok, I’m not asking again. You clearly have no reason to call me a misandrist, you’re just annoyed at being called out for your views on Depp’s victims."

Good, don't ask again as you know exactly why I said it.

I really don’t. Fine, I’ll ask again - why are you calling me a misandrist?

It is not possible for a woman to be abusive, violent, bullying or have any Cluster B personality traits.

If she does, it's a man's fault.
Women cannot be psychopathic. If they behave like that it's just an abuse response to a nasty man.

Men are never victims of DV at the hands of women. If they are it's just delayed PTSD on the part of the poor woman

Repeat

Back to the thread. I posted this elsewhere but thoughts on this?

This is a Stanford Law Professor

twitter.com/mldauber/status/1532374892879917060?s=21&t=ANkxc9uaAQZygLyjY1j51Q

You don’t think JD’s pr team has anything to do with the what’s on SM

Were you not open minded in regard to the AH and JD court case ?