Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to not want all models to look like 'real' women?

237 replies

beattieedny · 21/05/2022 18:31

Just that really. I am much more likely to buy clothing if the model looks like looks slim. I don't care for the current thing of showing clothes (aside from specifically for plus sized ofc) on fat people. It's not as attractive.
I am a thin person but have been fat by the way.

OP posts:
ObjectionHearsay · 21/05/2022 22:37

Porkmore · 21/05/2022 18:45

I'd like to see some size 12's. All super small, or larger sizes.

Yes please! And not size 12 and 5ft10

Give us a size 12 woman who's about 5ft5

tiredanddangerous · 21/05/2022 22:40

Yabu. I want to see what the clothes would look like on me, not on a size 6 model.

Iamthewalnut · 21/05/2022 22:52

So 'fat' women are not attractive...to you. I personally prefer the rubinesque figure to skinny, but everyone finds different body shapes attractive, so surely clothes modelled on a variety of body shapes to appeal to different people makes the most sense?

However, I do agree that some companies (Snag, I'm looking at you) take things too far. Yes, it's wonderful that women of all sizes have confidence and feel beautiful (and I say that as someone who has been every size from a 6 to an 18 and felt far more self-conscious at the smaller end of that scale) but normalising being morbidly obese is worrying from a health perspective.

LowlandLucky · 21/05/2022 22:53

I would just like to see models smiling instead of looking like miserable gits

GarlandsinGreece · 21/05/2022 23:12

To the earlier poster who suggested there should be default settings, so that you can choose your size model—excellent idea.

I’m size 8 and 5’7, and definitely scroll on by larger models wearing clothes, as I can’t get a good idea of how the clothes will look on me, just as I imagine many larger women feel frustrated looking at endless photos of skinny models. Better to please all women than just a few.

Stravaig · 21/05/2022 23:18

I suppose if we wanted to combine showing a more representative range of sizes with an awareness of their corresponding health or harms, we could designate the models by bmi, i.e. underweight, healthy, overweight, obese, morbidly obese. Visualise the clothing but also your health - canny, and possibly even effective. Unfortunately I don't think it will catch on ...

Giraffesandbottoms · 22/05/2022 06:19

My comment about absurdly thin was in response to someone talking about “heroin chic” models.

I think size 8/10 is reasonable. These threads are always skewed because the majority of posters are overweight.

justfiveminutes · 22/05/2022 06:36

I know what you mean op. I long for the day it is possible to find clothes being modelled on someone who is slim. When oh when will this prejudice end. Come on retailers, we are being deprived of slim models in society and you must do better.

urrrgh46 · 22/05/2022 06:45

Imo models should either represent the average, so something like 5'5" and size 14ish? or have a range of sizes and heights. I'm 5'1 and very tiny and tbh I take absolutely no notice what clothes look like on models because they certainly won't look like that on me 🤗🤣 The only time I can do that is when Danni Minogue shows her range on herself.

Creative34 · 22/05/2022 06:53

FirewomanSam · 21/05/2022 18:38

I’m a size 14 and the only time I ever see models around my size, at least for mainstream clothing brands, they are advertising plus-size clothing that doesn’t even come in my size (the models have clearly been clipped into the clothes or are wearing smaller sample sizes). Personally I love it when brands show items on a whole range of sizes, Snag Tights for example do this brilliantly.

‘Snag tights do this brilliantly’ 😂😂😂

They can’t exactly use a skinny model can they?! ... there’s no chub to rub!

SirSidneyRuffDiamond · 22/05/2022 07:13

I really like websites that allow customers to upload pictures of themselves wearing the clothes. That way I get to see a range of sizes and heights, but also different ways of styling clothes. So often shops like Cos and Toast style their pieces in a way that is relatively unflattering to keep to a uniform company aesthetic. "Real life" women can show that look in "the wild" and in a more achievable way. I am medium height and medium/slim but pear-shaped and very short-waisted - no models ever seem to have a similar body shape.

UseOfWeapons · 22/05/2022 07:17

Interesting responses. I’m absolutely rubbish at clothes, and rarely look at clothes online, so my main source of opinion comes from what I see in the high street, or on TV adverts,
I’m 5’8”, very slim and quite muscular. But I’m also 56, teeth not very good, have some wobbly cellulite, and thin, short hair. Why not have ‘models’ who are all sorts of shapes, sizes, proportions… ? I can’t tell what clothes will look like on my body unless I try them on. A range of people showing the clothes would give me far better idea, but it even if it didn’t, I hate the fact that only certain types of body seem to be shown. I’d like to see all sorts of women, and get rid of this idea of only perfection should be shown or celebrated. IMO, strong, confident, curvy women look best in most clothing, but it seems most retailers have yet to take this on board.

Merryclaire · 22/05/2022 07:22

Creative34 · 22/05/2022 06:53

‘Snag tights do this brilliantly’ 😂😂😂

They can’t exactly use a skinny model can they?! ... there’s no chub to rub!

Completely untrue - many slim people get chafing too. The idealised ‘thigh gap’ isn’t a reality for most as is dependent on hip and thigh width etc.

pattish · 22/05/2022 07:27

Blossomtoes · 21/05/2022 21:45

And heroin chic was?

I don’t think you can compare. Yes, we do have a problem with eating disorders, but it is nothing like even on the same scale as our obesity epidemic. If we teach young girls that it’s ok to be fat (and to think otherwise is ‘fat shaming’) they will grow up thinking having an unhealthy BMI is normal.

While that might be good for their mental health, it certainly isn’t good for their physical health.

Thedogshouses · 22/05/2022 07:28

I agree. This morning or Lorraine modelled the new trend of peasted skirts on very large models the other day. Pleated skirts make anyone with a big arse look like a centour. I wonder how many women 16 and above truly love their curves and celebrate?

WalkerWalking · 22/05/2022 07:28

What gets me is that thin or larger, all these models still have unachievable figures (or rather, only achievable through photoshop).

I'd love to see thinner models with a bit of a belly, or anyone with some wobbly arm fat. If a website could show me someone looking good with my actual figure (straight legs, wide hips, flat bum, solid gut) they could have all my money! It's easy to look good if your plus size shape is a perfectly proportioned hour glass.

Merryclaire · 22/05/2022 07:34

Giraffesandbottoms · 22/05/2022 06:19

My comment about absurdly thin was in response to someone talking about “heroin chic” models.

I think size 8/10 is reasonable. These threads are always skewed because the majority of posters are overweight.

Why are the majority of posters ‘overweight’? Is that a comment on posters on MN in general? Or just those with opinions about body image? Either way you sound very prejudiced. In my experience, an obsession with body image takes up too much headspace in most women of every shape and size.
The OP clearly has issues with her own body image and wanted to stir up a debate about whether fat people should be allowed to exist in the same ‘beauty sphere’ as thin people.
However, no one should need the approval of others to feel attractive and represented. You’re not going to find every model aspirational regardless of how slim they are.
Thin people are in no way underrepresented in media or advertising so I really don’t see why it’s so offensive to see other body types being included for a change.

SnowyPetals · 22/05/2022 07:34

PurpleDaisies · 21/05/2022 22:24

I think a good idea would be to just have every body type available to view. It costs more money maybe, but I think customers would appreciate it

How can that possibly work? You’d need masses and masses of models.

Personally, I would prefer to pay less for the clothes than suck up the inevitable additional cost of having multiple models for everything. You have to use your imagination anyway, because seeing a dress on a size 14 model who is busty with long dark hair isn't really helpful if you're a size 14 pear shape with short blonde hair.

pattish · 22/05/2022 07:36

Sunquench · 21/05/2022 22:18

A very brief description on thin privilege. I suspect this will divide a lot of people but I guess that boils down to how you view overweight people. I for one don’t always assume they’re lazy or gluttonous for being overweight. I don’t think it’s always a simple choice. If it was, everybody would be thin.

Sorry, I think the Emperor is naked there…

How the hell is there such a thing as thin privilege? Phrases like that make a mockery of white privilege/male privilege.

Not being obese isn’t something you are born with - in most cases people avoid obesity by eating healthily, not binge eating and living an active life. That doesn’t make them ‘privileged’ - it means they’ve made good choices.

Not really the same as being black, or being a woman, is it? What a joke.

MenopauseSucks · 22/05/2022 07:37

They need to show how clothes are on short women!!!!
I'm 5ft tall & most short ranges are for women under 5ft 3 so still too long for me but I like to see how they hang & whether the clothes look take-upable!

shivbo2014 · 22/05/2022 07:38

I want to see them on a range of different sizes. Lucy and Yak are good at this.

HMSSophia · 22/05/2022 07:39

For fuck's sake, clothes are photographed on models in preset for you the buyer to aspire, to hope, to desire, to look good in the item. It's advertising - you know, all about manipulating you. It's got fuck all to do with helping the buyer seriously identify if they will look good in said item. It's about promoting the fantasy that you MIGHT look good. Hence the use of "beautiful" "aspirational" models

alilstressed · 22/05/2022 07:47

@Discovereads in some cultures, women with gaps in their teeth are considered to be very beautiful and highly favoured.
We need to shift this -often damaging- western standard of beauty.

Penguinsaregreat · 22/05/2022 07:55

I like it when they say what size the model is and how tall. I don’t want short dresses. I need to be able to bend down etc in them and not show my backside. However I did buy a dress on the basis that it was ‘below the knee’ and the model was 5”9. When it cam it was fat shorter.
Axxan aside is there a shortage of good looking men? Most male models I see are very unattractive and not slim.

Sweepingeyelashes · 22/05/2022 07:59

I am a size 8. I rather resent the idea that I am not a "real woman" because I'm not overweight with a healthy BMI. (Yes, we know it doesn't work with very fit athletes but you're probably not an All Black rugby player are you? ) A lady who ran a boutique once confessed to me why she stocked very few large sizes. She said that she'd have a customer in, find an outfit that looked great and then the customer said she wasn't going to buy new clothes till she lost weight!

Swipe left for the next trending thread