Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Lee Anderson, Ashfield MP insists Jack Monroe has made a fortune on the backs of the poor.

736 replies

newnamethanks · 15/05/2022 16:47

AIBU to hope for a libel trial as entertaining as Vardy v Rooney and an outcome that rivals the Katy Hopkins debacle?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
jgw1 · 15/05/2022 20:32

skodadoda · 15/05/2022 20:03

I agree. Jack Monroe suggests strategies she has found helpful. MPs have subsidised restaurants and bars and a subsistence allowance as well as generous expenses. Monroe isn’t telling people that food poverty is down to their inability to cook or budget.

Well if only these poor people were clever enough and had the aspirations to be MPs then they too could have subsidised food and drink.

Scianel · 15/05/2022 20:33

If Jack has genuinely helped the poor with budgeting and recipes, not sure why she should be expected to be a charity and work for free.

I doubt any genuinely poor person has the remotest bit of interest in her and her advice. She is interesting only to the twitterati.

Arewethebadguys · 15/05/2022 20:34

AllotmentTime · 15/05/2022 17:09

Why can she say it and he can’t…

Because she is drawing on personal experience of poverty to say “it’s shit, here are strategies that may help you”

Whereas he is looking down from a place of spectacular privilege to say “you’re doing it wrong and your poverty is your own fault”.

How people can’t see the difference between those two positions is astonishing to me.

Yup

Clymene · 15/05/2022 20:35

I would call not paying any taxes for a year tax evasion @Fluval.

I think to suggest otherwise is mere semantics.

I've just taken a look at her website. She has a link for a Tip Jar and a link for Donations - both go to her PayPal. Apart from specific types of food (pasta, beans, soups, etc) she has six links on her site. Two of them are asking for cash. She also asks for cash at the end of every recipe.

Honestly, I really don't know what more evidence some people need that they're being taking for a ride.

WeCouldBeSpearows · 15/05/2022 20:37

Her recipes are freely available online.

She has given her books away to libraries.

She has sold books at effectively cost to people that would struggled to afford them.

However wealthy she is or she isn't, that comment is unnecessary. I hope she wins.

Dancingmoon · 15/05/2022 20:40

AllotmentTime · 15/05/2022 17:09

Why can she say it and he can’t…

Because she is drawing on personal experience of poverty to say “it’s shit, here are strategies that may help you”

Whereas he is looking down from a place of spectacular privilege to say “you’re doing it wrong and your poverty is your own fault”.

How people can’t see the difference between those two positions is astonishing to me.

She says she's middle class in this article:

www.theguardian.com/society/patrick-butler-cuts-blog/2013/jun/06/food-poverty-jack-monroe-it-could-happen-to-anyone

"I had a £27 grand a year job. I've not been brought up on benefits and a tracksuit watching Jeremy Kyle. I'm a middle class, well educated young woman who fell a bit by the way side".

Fluval · 15/05/2022 20:40

Clymene · 15/05/2022 20:35

I would call not paying any taxes for a year tax evasion @Fluval.

I think to suggest otherwise is mere semantics.

I've just taken a look at her website. She has a link for a Tip Jar and a link for Donations - both go to her PayPal. Apart from specific types of food (pasta, beans, soups, etc) she has six links on her site. Two of them are asking for cash. She also asks for cash at the end of every recipe.

Honestly, I really don't know what more evidence some people need that they're being taking for a ride.

It isn’t mere semantics at all, tax evasion is a criminal offence and, like most, has a specific mens rea element, which seems extremely unlikely to be met in these circumstances.

Theluggage15 · 15/05/2022 20:41

Win what?! She’d never dare have a court case that could lay bare her lies. Of course she’ll keep the money that she’s been asking for to help fund the nonexistent court case.

ninnynonny · 15/05/2022 20:41

Also, a lot of her tweets are only allowed to be responded by people she has chosen to answer them. That suggests she doesn't like hearing from critics

Clymene · 15/05/2022 20:42

Oh okay @Fluval. I wasn't aware we were talking legal terms.

Shall we find a different term then? Tax cheat? Ripping off the NHS? what term would you prefer?

Maëlys · 15/05/2022 20:43

I've just taken a look at her website. She has a link for a Tip Jar and a link for Donations - both go to her PayPal. Apart from specific types of food (pasta, beans, soups, etc) she has six links on her site. Two of them are asking for cash. She also asks for cash at the end of every recipe.

What are the odds that she has no intention of actually going through with the libel case but is happy to take donations for it via her PayPal?

If people aren’t donating to an official crowdfunder then presumably they’d have no way of getting their money back if the case doesn’t happen.

mmmmmmghturep · 15/05/2022 20:44

Funny how these MPs kept their gobs shut about poorer people when they were wanting them to wear masks and take vaccines. THEN it was "we are all in this together"

Villagewaspbyke · 15/05/2022 20:46

Clymene · 15/05/2022 19:49

I don't have a problem with that per se. I do have a problem with a wealthy young woman taking donations from people living in poverty because she pretends she's poor.

That's a real reverse Robin Hood tactic.

Yes I agree. Also we so rarely hear the voices of those who genuinely live in poverty. We so often instead hear from faux poverty types or people writing books about pretending to live in poverty (Nickle and dimed, etc).

The voices of genuinely poor people are being drowned out by guardian reading/ writing faux poor. I don’t think it’s a good think.

Fluval · 15/05/2022 20:47

Clymene · 15/05/2022 20:42

Oh okay @Fluval. I wasn't aware we were talking legal terms.

Shall we find a different term then? Tax cheat? Ripping off the NHS? what term would you prefer?

Like I’ve said previously, it appears to be a simple, accidental late filing and, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, I’d call it just that.

Even your non-legal terms like ‘tax cheat’ imply the deliberate withholding of taxes, which does not seem to be the case here.

jgw1 · 15/05/2022 20:47

mmmmmmghturep · 15/05/2022 20:44

Funny how these MPs kept their gobs shut about poorer people when they were wanting them to wear masks and take vaccines. THEN it was "we are all in this together"

I am sure that we can look back in Hansard and see that Lee Anderson argued fiercely in the House for the continuation of the universal credit uplift.

WhiteFire · 15/05/2022 20:50

mmmmmmghturep · 15/05/2022 20:44

Funny how these MPs kept their gobs shut about poorer people when they were wanting them to wear masks and take vaccines. THEN it was "we are all in this together"

Maybe now is the time to stop trying to shoehorn this is to everything.

WeCouldBeSpearows · 15/05/2022 20:54

ninnynonny · 15/05/2022 20:41

Also, a lot of her tweets are only allowed to be responded by people she has chosen to answer them. That suggests she doesn't like hearing from critics

I'm pretty sure if you had been subject to as much criticism as Jack has, you'd do the same. I certainly would.

Andromachehadabadday · 15/05/2022 20:58

WeCouldBeSpearows · 15/05/2022 20:54

I'm pretty sure if you had been subject to as much criticism as Jack has, you'd do the same. I certainly would.

But if she stopped lying and saying she was poor and asking people far, poorer for money she wouldn’t get as much criticism.

I think that’s worthy of criticism.

Georgeskitchen · 15/05/2022 20:59

Crikeyalmighty · 15/05/2022 19:00

Actually I admire Jack, ok she may be not quite what people think and doing reasonably ok now but she is making use of what she learnt in terms of coping in the period in life where she had an awful time to maybe help other people. No different to those of us on here who try and support/help people in various situations we have experienced- but may not be experiencing right now.

Lee Anderson on the other hand is an arse , in more ways than one, a misogynistic big mouth who changed political direction once he realised what way the wind was blowing in Ashfield- I'm originally from that area and given that he's making exceptionally good money and expenses might have been better keeping his views on people's bad budgeting habits and Jack monroe to himself , she's actually a very smart cookie -

Did you realise that it's not just Tory MPs that claim big expenses for everything? MPs of all parties do it

If this guy was a labour MP he'd be claiming exactly the same!!

mmmmmmghturep · 15/05/2022 21:04

@WhiteFire Why? Its totally relevant. People saw through it. Its why the vaccine uptake was low in some communities. You really expect people to trust the same state that leaves them to starve in other circumstances.

newnamethanks · 15/05/2022 21:04

The misogyny and bitter envy on this thread is astonishing. Woman earns money. STONE HER. New Tory of dubious provenance bags himself seat in Parliament, a hefty salary with recent payrise, a comfortable expense account and subsidised food and alcohol suitable to his wants. PRAISE HIM. He's a success with his snout in the public trough. Get over yourselves women, shame on you.

OP posts:
Wrongkindofovercoat · 15/05/2022 21:04

Whether or not you agree with Lee Anderson's politics, he's far better placed to comment on poverty and solutions than Jack Monroe

Is he though ? He is apparently an ex coal miner , so had a good job with decent benefits, what did he do after he left or was his pit closed down ? Did he go straight into politics at a national level with decent pay and excellent benefits ?

PAFMO · 15/05/2022 21:05

WhiteFire · 15/05/2022 20:50

Maybe now is the time to stop trying to shoehorn this is to everything.

The Whataboutery from certain posters with their personal axes grinding away is tiresome, isn't it?
Unless of course that poster is saying (which at first glance they seem to be) that poor people shouldn't have been made aware of the need to take precautions against Covid....

MaryAndHerNet · 15/05/2022 21:06

Georgeskitchen · 15/05/2022 20:59

Did you realise that it's not just Tory MPs that claim big expenses for everything? MPs of all parties do it

If this guy was a labour MP he'd be claiming exactly the same!!

I think people need to remember that the vast majority of MPs expenses are actually wages for their staff.

You need to ignore the bullshit headlines touted by people with an agenda and look into the facts.

Eg put of 190k expenses. 160k of which go to office and staff wages. Unless you're going to sack all of the support staff involved in politics, that'd be hundreds of people unemployed.

SavoyCabbage · 15/05/2022 21:07

Does anyone know which pit he worked at and in what capacity and for how long ? I don't know what pit but he started in 1986 and he worked as a miner for ten years. He uses the words 'worked down the pit' and 'followed my dad down the pit' and 'worked as a miner'.

He doesn't say 'worked for a mining company.' or anything like that.