AIBU to neither know nor care about the details of Rooney v Vardy?

[PuzzledObserver]

One of them says the other one leaked some stories about her on Twitter and now the second one is suing the first one. Or something like that.

Yawn.

AIBU?

No. Even Vlad couldn’t be that stupid.

The paper I read has a full page on it every bloody day. I skip of course, but despair that this is deemed to be national news.

Turn the page Bridget. Not only in your paper but here you are on a thread about it. How can that be?

@Bloodybridget
Try reading the Times instead of a trashy red top.,

I think that you are clearly bothered enough to start a post about it. It's very easily avoided in the news. I don't actually understand why people say it isn't a big deal or that they are arguing over nothing. If someone was making money off the back of you without your consent, wouldn't you have wanted to call them out on it? Coleen Rooney had stories shared to the Sun paper about her, someone sold them. They knew she wouldn't have wanted them to and their sole motivation was greed. Why should she have to put up with that, she's already explained how it made her feel distrusting of those around her as she didn't know where the leak was coming from. Vardy went on Losse women and lied about this topic when Coleen wasn't given an opportunity to voice her concerns.

It has given me a good laugh. The DM (yes, I know) has been, to their great surprise and doubtless everyone else's, impressed by Wayne Rooney. Described him as a surprisingly eloquent and thoughtful witness.

@newnamethanks that's exactly what I do, as I said. The thread was started by someone who is as baffled by the whole business as I am, and I guess I'm free to agree with her, even if that's not agreeable to you.
@TizerorFizz the paper I read is the i, not a trashy red top.

The Times has had some excellent coverage.

The I? I’m amazed. I get it online but skim read. The Times has been more measured. The Telegraph has talked about clothes.