What a good way to increase the drain on taxpayers money without doing anything to actually address the problem.
We have a good couple of decades worth of evidence that banning breeds does not work - it isn't the answer, no matter how much it feels like it is, it still isn't.
To put it into terms you might understand - imagine thinking that banning Volvos, Audis, Landrovers and Saabs would reduce or prevent car related deaths.
Yep, it wouldn't, it is that pointless.
In fact, more so, because unlike cars, first the dog has to be identified as a prohibited breed, they don't come with a makers badge nailed to their fronts, so that requires trained professionals and usually, a court case.
Just kennelling a dog for around six months can cost around 2K, before you start thinking about the costs of a court case to determine if the dog is illegal and if the dog is in fact dangerous.
Due to the law on dangerous dog breeds, we now actually have MORE illegal 'type' dogs in the UK than we did when the ban first came into being - because that ban made 'type' dogs, ie, crossbreeds of, dogs that simply look like a banned breed (regardless of genetics!), illegal.
This is how ridiculous that ban is - two perfectly legal dogs of recognised breeds with documented dna going back generations can produce an illegal type puppy. Say a labrador x staffordshire bull terrier.
Furthermore, within a litter of puppies who have the same parents (because a bitch can have a litter with more than one father) - some puppies could grow up to be illegal type, and some could be just fine.
So people who had no intentions of owning an illegal so called 'dangerous' breed could easily end up doing so, with a puppy who starts out legal and grows into a particular shape/size that falls into the illegal category.
How on earth was legislation like that EVER going to help?