Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Labour are hypocrites

540 replies

Labscollie · 08/05/2022 08:24

Beergate. Turns out the event was planned. To think of all the slating Starmer gave Johnson. 🤔 This site's favourite newspaper, the Dailymail, has released a leaked memo, which might mark Starmer's downfall. If Johnson could survive, can Starmer?

OP posts:
BringBackCoffeeCreams · 09/05/2022 07:46

Toomanybooks22 · 09/05/2022 07:07

I think the fact that someone within the group actually set out in an itinerary before the event that they would get a takeaway (I think they even refer to the specific restaurant?) is the really difficult part of it as if KS saw that then it was definitely planned but it will be interesting what else comes out from the police investigation.

Article on another thread has a barrister saying it's actually proof that the rules were followed. It shows that it was a planned part of the working schedule and therefore was within the rules at the time.

Labscollie · 09/05/2022 07:49

BringBackCoffeeCreams · 09/05/2022 07:46

Article on another thread has a barrister saying it's actually proof that the rules were followed. It shows that it was a planned part of the working schedule and therefore was within the rules at the time.

A barrister has really put their name to that?!

OP posts:
Labscollie · 09/05/2022 07:52

Fairisleflora · 08/05/2022 20:34

Without having any particular affiliation to either party, Keir is clearly a man of integrity, Boris lies as much as he breathes. There is a massive, massive chasm between what they did. Only the Daily Mail and their idiotic readers think otherwise. The DM should stop going on about it - if just shows how thick they think their readers are.

No politician has integrity.

OP posts:
Blossomtoes · 09/05/2022 08:09

No politician has integrity

Is it surgically removed when they’re elected? I can think of a few with integrity but they’re mostly at the older end.

SleeplessInEngland · 09/05/2022 08:12

A leaked WhatsApp conversation between Tory MPs suggests they’re worried Starmer will actually resign and make them look even worse, which is why none of them are publicly calling for it. Doesn’t help that Johnson is likely to be fined further.

Labscollie · 09/05/2022 08:17

Blossomtoes · 09/05/2022 08:09

No politician has integrity

Is it surgically removed when they’re elected? I can think of a few with integrity but they’re mostly at the older end.

Definitely

OP posts:
HappydaysArehere · 09/05/2022 08:21

For goodness sake, Johnson lied time and again to Parliament. He held a loud raucous party (karaoke and all) plus other gatherings heavily focussed on drink which required a suitcase taken to the Co-Op for regular supplies. Stop buying the Daily Mail and get real.

Zilla1 · 09/05/2022 08:49

I think those PPs who say the government never take responsibility have inadvertently got it spot on. This government never take anything, rather they are outstanding in their generosity, they give tax cuts in a couple of years when things are more predictable and people will value it, the give shopping advice for those who've begun to feel the pinch and are frittering money away, they give examples of how to act and how not to act. Generosity exemplars. And no, Keir was not acting like all the teachers and nurses that Michael Fabricant? said were busy having a drink and a party during lockdown. He was worse because he holds himself to a higher standard than the rest of the people. Boris is a man of the people, he doesn't hold himself to a higher standard.

Trainbear · 09/05/2022 08:58

Was Angela Rayner herself the source of the leaked rumours about Fanjo-gate?

BringBackCoffeeCreams · 09/05/2022 09:06

Labscollie · 09/05/2022 07:49

A barrister has really put their name to that?!

Yes, and I'd bet my cornflake collection on him having a better understanding of the law than you do

Labscollie · 09/05/2022 09:47

HappydaysArehere · 09/05/2022 08:21

For goodness sake, Johnson lied time and again to Parliament. He held a loud raucous party (karaoke and all) plus other gatherings heavily focussed on drink which required a suitcase taken to the Co-Op for regular supplies. Stop buying the Daily Mail and get real.

I don't buy the Daily Mail. I'm not the one who needs to get real, by brushing off the hypocrisy of a party, who pushed for the PM to resign, when their own house wasn't in order.

OP posts:
Blossomtoes · 09/05/2022 09:49

Trainbear · 09/05/2022 08:58

Was Angela Rayner herself the source of the leaked rumours about Fanjo-gate?

No. That was yet another lying Tory smear.

Labscollie · 09/05/2022 09:53

BringBackCoffeeCreams · 09/05/2022 09:06

Yes, and I'd bet my cornflake collection on him having a better understanding of the law than you do

The lengths some will go to, to protect their own bias.

OP posts:
Eddiesferret · 09/05/2022 10:00

Labscollie if YOU can't tell the difference between actual law breaking and spurious allegations that the police have no alternative but to investigate.. then you are just daft.

Johnson is a serial lier. Always has been and always will be. He was sacked from numerous jobs before this one for lying . He was investigated AND found guilty. A rather important difference to Starmer who has been found guilty of nothing.

I can contact the police and accuse YOU of pretty much anything. If I get enough of my mates to contact them and accuse you of the same thing . (As has been done in Durham) they are obliged to investigate.

So if I do that and accuse you of being .. let's say - a fraudster. Does that mean you are guilty of fraud ? No it doesn't. Once the case is investigated and evidence is found to support the allegations, then depending upon the nature of the offence you will either go to trial or be given a penalty notice.

Until then you are innocent.

I also don't understand all those Tories calling for Starmer to resign . Why should he resign when guilty of nothing - when the PM who HAS been found guilty refused to go. Surely that's the hypocrisy... and then , when the Sue Gray report is finally released and you find out exactly what he has been up to - what are you going to use as an excuse then ?

MarshaBradyo · 09/05/2022 10:21

Eddiesferret · 09/05/2022 10:00

Labscollie if YOU can't tell the difference between actual law breaking and spurious allegations that the police have no alternative but to investigate.. then you are just daft.

Johnson is a serial lier. Always has been and always will be. He was sacked from numerous jobs before this one for lying . He was investigated AND found guilty. A rather important difference to Starmer who has been found guilty of nothing.

I can contact the police and accuse YOU of pretty much anything. If I get enough of my mates to contact them and accuse you of the same thing . (As has been done in Durham) they are obliged to investigate.

So if I do that and accuse you of being .. let's say - a fraudster. Does that mean you are guilty of fraud ? No it doesn't. Once the case is investigated and evidence is found to support the allegations, then depending upon the nature of the offence you will either go to trial or be given a penalty notice.

Until then you are innocent.

I also don't understand all those Tories calling for Starmer to resign . Why should he resign when guilty of nothing - when the PM who HAS been found guilty refused to go. Surely that's the hypocrisy... and then , when the Sue Gray report is finally released and you find out exactly what he has been up to - what are you going to use as an excuse then ?

Didn’t the police dismiss investigation earlier but re-opened it

It must not have met the criteria but now does in their view

oldwhyno · 09/05/2022 10:50

yeah, the public aren't really that impressed Labour's "holier than thou" hypocrisy over this and Rayner "honey" 🤢 trapping feckless tories bragging about flashing her "ginger growler" (her words).

SleeplessInEngland · 09/05/2022 10:57

Insterestingly a new poll suggests that if Starmer is fined the majority of Lab voters think he should resign while the majority of Con voters think he shouldn't.

HRTQueen · 09/05/2022 11:08

Starmer isn’t seen as a huge threat the the Tories so yes keeping him as leader is better the devil you know

also many Tories are not ready for Johnsom to be replaced if Starmer resigns how does that reflect on Johnson still being PM

derxa · 09/05/2022 11:13

Zilla1 · 08/05/2022 11:32

'you'd never know there was a war going on would you ?'

Exactly. The PM is busy helping Ukraine and saving the free world, practically on the front line, so I'd expect every patriotic person who wasn't a Russian bot to support the PM and stop going on about cost of living crises and suitcases of booze and Jennifer Accuri and bridges and parties and PPE contracts and fines, well except fines for Kier, obviously. We all know the naysayers are Kremlin Gremlins.

You need to learn to spell your leader's name correctly.

RufusthefIoraImissingreindeer · 09/05/2022 11:18

The lengths some will go to, to protect their own bias

I've confused myself, are you saying that we shouldn't believe trained barristers when they talk about their understanding of the law

Or that betting your cornflake collection is a step too far

Or neither of them

Squillerman · 09/05/2022 11:20

Honestly don’t see how they’re of the same calibre at all. One was a beer and takeaway after work whilst on the road together, could technically say they were still working while eating. The government had organised birthday parties and various other get togethers including a Christmas party. Plus the government actually formulated the rules only to break them numerous times.

Labscollie · 09/05/2022 11:33

Eddiesferret · 09/05/2022 10:00

Labscollie if YOU can't tell the difference between actual law breaking and spurious allegations that the police have no alternative but to investigate.. then you are just daft.

Johnson is a serial lier. Always has been and always will be. He was sacked from numerous jobs before this one for lying . He was investigated AND found guilty. A rather important difference to Starmer who has been found guilty of nothing.

I can contact the police and accuse YOU of pretty much anything. If I get enough of my mates to contact them and accuse you of the same thing . (As has been done in Durham) they are obliged to investigate.

So if I do that and accuse you of being .. let's say - a fraudster. Does that mean you are guilty of fraud ? No it doesn't. Once the case is investigated and evidence is found to support the allegations, then depending upon the nature of the offence you will either go to trial or be given a penalty notice.

Until then you are innocent.

I also don't understand all those Tories calling for Starmer to resign . Why should he resign when guilty of nothing - when the PM who HAS been found guilty refused to go. Surely that's the hypocrisy... and then , when the Sue Gray report is finally released and you find out exactly what he has been up to - what are you going to use as an excuse then ?

Starmer has been found guilty of nothing....yet. as for this barrister, all I have read is conjecture and his own conclusion as to the differences between the proven and alleged contravention of lockdown laws. There is no legal reasoning I can see. Just a puff of air around how he has interrupted work related gatherings. So johnson is a liar, aren't they all.

OP posts:
ChrisReasBathEggs · 09/05/2022 14:49

I think this is a load of hot air. What the Tories did was far worse. It wasn't a curry while working (or not working because it was delivered late supposedly). If they were going down the local Londis with a suitcase to fill with booze and was sending a group email to 100+ people to bring their own booze or having interior decorators over to celebrate getting rid of an aide, then fair enough. It was a curry during a work meeting.

Just another diversion tactic so the Tories can do the square root of fuck all about sorting out the cost of living crisis and the utter shit show if the local elections.

At least Starmer is considering resigning. Boris isn't, and I expect there are far more incidences of rule breaking to come.

I find it hard to understand how a work curry vs a culture of boozing and partying on multiple occasions (plus an aide going for a drive to 'test his eyesight' when he had tested positive the week before) compares.

SleeplessInEngland · 09/05/2022 15:37

Journalists reporting that Starmer will announce later today he'll resign if fined. Would make the tories look even worse but it's a hit they'll probably be happy to take and will pray people forget about it all before the next election.

Zilla1 · 09/05/2022 16:03

It just goes to show how poorly Keir has misjudged the PM. He's a man of principle and won't let the nation down by running away if some bureaucrat issues a fine. Keir won''t get more respect from Conservative MPs by fetishising his principles. Boris has shown he's above things like principles.

Swipe left for the next trending thread