A PP asked if countries like Ireland and Germany, which use standardised systems for lesson plans, perform better or worse than the UK.
I’ve copied the below from the OECD’s key findings on Better Life Index. www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/topics/education/
Ireland outperforms the UK on all of the key findings. In Ireland, teachers are generally highly respected and have good work life balance and longer holidays than the UK (e.g. 3 months in summer at secondary, 2 months in summer at primary).
To me, this seems to undermine the argument than, unless lesson plans are prepared from scratch by each individual teacher, teaching cannot be effectively differentiated. Surely with the appropriate degree of discretion, teaching absolutely can. How could it be the case that standardisation works in Germany, Ireland and France, but not in the UK?
“Ireland
^^The Irish can expect to go through about17.9 years of educationbetween the ages of 5 and 39, in line with the OECD average of 18 years.
In Ireland,85%of adults aged 25-64 have completed upper secondary education, higher than the OECD average of 79%.
The average student in Ireland scored 505 in reading literacy, maths and sciences, above the OECD average of 488.
Germany
Germans can expect to go through about18.2 years of educationbetween the ages of 5 and 39, in line with the OECD average of 18 years.
In Germany,86%of adults aged 25-64 have completed upper secondary education, higher than the OECD average of 79%.
The average student in Germany scored 500 in reading literacy, maths and sciences,above the OECD average of 488.
UK
People in the United Kingdom can expect to go through16.8 years of educationbetween the ages of 5 and 39, below the OECD average of 18 years.
In the United Kingdom,82%of adults aged 25-64 have completed upper secondary education, higher than the OECD average of 79%.
The average student in the United Kingdom scored 503 in reading literacy, maths and sciences, above the OECD average of 488. “