[quote Octavia174]@mellongoose
If you're using the 'relative poverty' figure, please don't. By definition you will always have a large percentage relatively poor compared to the average
why not? why should we accept a large number of people so much worse of than the better off?
Absolutely poverty has gone down in recent years, although one child living in absolutely poverty is one too many. That is why there is a safety net of a welfare state
No it hasn't, 14% of the UK pop. live on below the amount the govt says they need & tell that to the parent trying to do the right thing but getting a benefits sanction, ending up on a credit agency, then stuck in a cycle of never ending debt.
Even then....parents are still responsible for ensuring their children are fed, clothed, sheltered, sent to school and taught right from wrong
What do you do when parents don't do this? do you realise that some people do not have the money to do this.
Some of the most deprived children I know grew to well rounded adults and ended up in fulfilling careers. Why? Because their parents, even though they had nothing, put their children's needs first and gave them confidence and ambition
..and plenty more don't regardless of their parents efforts, why is it Rashford had to make the Govt pay out for free school meals during hols time? do poor families get free food from Asda in the summer term?
I don't think you have any idea of some peoples struggles.[/quote]
Rashford grew up under a Labour government so his lived experience was not a conservative one.