Was Paul McCartney in 1969 the best looking rock star of all time?

[PaulForeverYokoNever]

AIBU to agree?

m.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=7&v=x6Gdonr6LDE&feature=emb_logo

Hell no.

Never thought he was that attractive.

I am really enjoying all the George Harrison love here😍
Definitely the best Beatle though I did have a John phase when I first got into them in the 80s

I had never thought much about Paul McCartney looks-wise because he was just Paul McCartney. He's a regular looking guy with extraordinary talent and I really admire that.

And then I saw the "Get Back" documentary...

Holy cow!
It was rather uncomfortable for me to just be watching him and thinking he was "a bit of alright", so to speak. Okay, I found him absolutely gorgeous!

To quote, "I've Got a Feeling" from the "Let it Be" sessions, these words summed up my feelings for PM:

"All these years I've been wandering around
Wondering how come nobody told me
All that I was looking for was somebody
Who looked like you"

No, not even in the top 1000.

Paul has a sweet face and is very handsome in animation (am biased as my brother looks a bit like him, it's been pointed out to him twice by total strangers).

Marc Bolan was technically active in '69 right? Yum.

Elvis was the best looking star of all time.

I don’t like The Beatles. Drippy and wet.

Paul was gorgeous. I've loved him for most of my life!

I don't see the Elvis attraction at all. He was very before my time but looking back at pictures he really doesn't do anything for me. My Mum even said she didn't see all the fuss.

i dont like him.

and not sure about his talent.

[quote PaulForeverYokoNever]For context (as 1969 was not baby face Paul era):

m.youtube.com/watch?v=XswWhnANn94[/quote]
He's always been baby faced. A beard doesn't change that.

Marc Bolan was technically active in '69 right? Yum.

I second that yum.

No I thought he came across as a bit of a prick in the recent documentary.
I was always a John fan.

@Sparklingbrook

I don't see the Elvis attraction at all. He was very before my time but looking back at pictures he really doesn't do anything for me. My Mum even said she didn't see all the fuss.

Glad it’s not just me! I don’t find him good looking at all!

Thank you @TheFreaksShallInheritTheEarth, phew! I find him slightly creepy.

Hell No, he looked like a Bassett hound.

@KurtWildesChristmasNamechange

Marc Bolan was technically active in '69 right? Yum.

I second that yum.

Marc Bolan was the poster on my wall when I was 12. Nice.

I don't think Lindsay Buckham has been mentioned, has he?

He was so gorgeous when he was younger.

*Buckingham

@MrsTerryPratchett I was going to post the same pic. That photo is just perfection!

Nobody has come close to him before or since, and in 68 he was stunning too.

As for Paul McCartney, I could never call him good looking at all.

Definitely Jim Morrison. He was a beautiful looking man, especially on stage in his leather trousers!

This makes me question myself, I'm 34 years old for gods sake. So cute though.

Is that George Harrison? I'm getting Nosferatu vibes from that photo.

EW, no definitely not

@Classica

Is that George Harrison? I'm getting Nosferatu vibes from that photo.

Yeah young Georgie.