"Countryside, rural havens for wildlife, forests and fields. Everything has been handed over to developers to make as much profit as they can out of our surroundings"
"On the other hand: rewilding, tree planting, wildlife corridors, regeneration of chalk streams and endangered habitats, reintroduction of endangered species."
A huge percentage of this 'wonderful' carbon reducing woodland planting won't be as idyllic as many would think. Think more along the lines of tightly packed, vast softwood (conifer) forests rather than leafy deciduous woodlands. Most of this 'rewilding' is just a nice little earner for wealthy companies who can continue to make a a tidy profit whilst fulfilling their carbon offset requirements.
Softwood forestry is a hugely profitable business strategy as it can be felled and re-planted. Shit for wildlife and the offset of carbon is debatable considering the necessary destruction of the farmland and preparation of land to develop the forest and then the work required to plant and then manage it....
So we lose agricultural land, bought up by wealthy companies ...we therefore lose farmers and the land we grow our food on. Where do we then get our food from? Oh yes, we'll import it. Great for the environment! Plus it'll be more expensive, yay.
This is will then in turn assist the demise of the middle class. It'll be the wealthy and the poor.
I don't think there's any rush to get rid of cancer. It's too profitable.
Books I think might stay, hopefully!
Cash I'd hate to see go but think it will.
The NHS.
I wasn't worried about the future 20 years ago but I am now.