OP do you think this counts as “research”?? Asking a self selected group of randoms on the internet? (Randoms which include men, menopausal women, women who have had a hysterectomy, women who are on contraception, singe women, women who are not TTC)?
If you think someone should ask a bunch of people, how about this: a person could study medical science and statistics for a number of years, including passing a really demanding test which requires them to prove they can do new medical science and statistics. Then you could take a group of such people and put them together to write a plan about who they will ask “Did you get pregnant after getting vaccinated”, how they will ask this, how many people they will ask (this is important!!), how they will select them (eg, you wouldn’t want to select them from a retirement home, but also not from a fertility clinic) etc. You make them work in a team so that if there is a problem, eg if someone suggests they ask menopausal women and men, someone else can spot this and correct. Then they write this up and send to the agency which decides where another similar team decides whether to give them money for it, and another where a similar team decides whether to give them ethical approval. If they get both, they do it, and write up what they concluded from their questionnaire in a paper. Before this paper is published it is checked by another team of similar people who, and this is the clever bit, DON’T KNOW THE NAMES OF THE PEOPLE WHO DID IT and don’t have their names revealed, so that they can’t go by reputation but really have to check what is written. If it passes that then it’s printed in a journal.
Ans guess what? That happened. They concluded having the vaccine won’t make you infertile.
But I guess you think your process of asking anonymous men and trolls and menopausal women on a forum, is equally valid be cause we’re all entitled to an opinion?!