If the NHS announced that there had to be explicit rationing of primary care to cut down demand - say:
- Only White British people, no BAME
Or
- Only people in employment say between 18 - 65 - no children, students or elderly people
Then those of you in the affected groups, or who have children or elderly parents would be claiming that it was disgraceful, discriminatory, etc, etc.
However, relying on telephone triage is equally discriminatory against those with communication impairments such as:
- Hearing impaired or deaf
- Visually impaired or blind
- Learning disabilities
- Speech, language and communication needs - such as stammers, aphasia, etc and who may need a communication device
- The elderly, who can't cope with electronic devices
Health Watch Camden wrote a report about this in 2016, well before Covid and before the Accessibility Standard became law, but they said then the way GP practices operated were in contravention of the NHS Accessibility Standard and The Equality Act.
All those of you, who are "able bodied" may well write how well telephone triage works for you; but if you were in an excluded group, would you be so keen?
GPs come on MN and talk about how they like telephone triage, because it cuts down on the time wasters! I cannot recall one GP, who showed any awareness of how some groups are excluded by it; and that their difficulties with access to primary care are magnified compared to the "normal population", which means in turn, their health outcomes are much worse. People with learning disabilities already have life expectancy 20 years less, and thats in part because of poor medical care. Numerous posters have written about how their elderly relatives have had serious conditions missed.
GPs should provide reasonable adjustments for people, who can't cope with the telephone, and/or online systems. I bet no GPs would come on here, supporting race discrimination, yet it seems ok to tacitly support disability or age discrimination?