@MasterBeth was going to leave you to it because it seemed like you can't really be arsed with any discussion but...
Clearly you don’t know loads about science. Maybe read the output of people who do know loads about science and stop making yourself look stupid.
Science isn't an absolute truth. It never has been and never will be. Absolute truths don't exist in science. "Facts" are accepted reality but might always be disproved in future. Scientists don't always agree.
If someone says they believe in God you can't shout them down by saying there is no evidence so they are wrong because 'Science'. That's not how science works.
Similarly 'Evolution' is accepted reality but if aliens land on the planet tomorrow and say Gotcha! that may well change. That's exactly how science works.
You can say you disagree with them, just as I might say I don't believe in God. You can also say there is no evidence in 'his' existence... but you can't say just because there is no evidence they are wrong and that is 'Science' and they should go and learn about 'Science'.
That's just... bad science.
There are loads of examples where the accepted reality was turned on it's head because it became observable.
I'm not trying to argue that a soul or a god or a past life or a ghost or a fairy exists, merely saying science can't actually rule it out. So the poster you sent to go read some science can read until her heart is content... none of the science that exists currently can disprove any one of those things 'absolutely'. So I don't see how the poster is making themselves look anymore stupid than someone who rattles on about Science as if it's absolute truth.
Did you learn about The Science That Is Absolute Truth from the MN Covid threads, by any chance?