Pretty sure it was @Tealightsandd who said poll tax was fair along with some other... misguided things.
I just think they should. I'm in a minority (perhaps of one) that sees securing a stable domestically produced supply of energy (plus good employment opportunities) as a priority over unlimited foreign travel.
A worthy goal but do you genuinely see trying to reopen the coal mines as the way forward?
97% of Scotland's electricity is met by renewables, so it's not impossible and we are the same country.
But you'd rather send people down the pit and rebuild the coal fired power plants which pollute the air and use vast amounts of water... instead of investing in renewables?
This doesn't gel with your contempt for foreign travel (and honestly I'm not sure how they are all that related). You had problems with them not stopping planes during covid, the three people I know who have been flying in the last year are all working in the renewable energy sector and needed to fly for work 
I'd prefer to combat climate change through education around and easy free access to birth control, encouragement for smaller families
Again... I hate to keep harping back to Scotland (but I will since you said the poll tax was fair), but the lack of births is currently one of the biggest threats to our economy. They are actively investigating funding IVF for single people as a way to get the birthrate up. Immigration would solve this, unfortunately that is exactly the opposite of what the UK government want.
Blair
Just quoting that one word because I think it's kind of amusing how on a thread about Thatcher you can bring up Blair so much, blaming him for not stopping and reversing (at cost) everything she did. I was very young under Blair, single parent family working unskilled jobs etc, and honestly I never once felt poor. My mum bought a house on her own wages. War crimes, obviously. But I never felt the level of poverty you see children in these days.
https://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/6738
The IFS seems to agree.
Turning first to poverty, both absolute and relative measures of income poverty fell markedly among children and pensioners
VS
By contrast, the incomes of poorer working-age adults without dependent children - the major demographic group not emphasised by Labour as a priority - changed very little over the period. As a result they fell behind the rest of the population and relative poverty levels rose.
Which probably shaped the attitudes we see rife today and the seemingly unwavering support for the tory gov. I'm not saying propping up low wages with benefits was a good thing - clearly it wasn't and like everything else, we are still suffering for it today.
But everything isn't black or white.
The most arguably black or white politician is undoubtedly Margaret Thatcher though.